New rule, Tom. "Everything not specifically prohibited is mandatory." 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists
Way to go, Mike. If you don't agree with a faction, refer to them in disparaging terms and tell them to go away. That'll solve the issue! Just so you know, we "old guard cronies" (kind of a catchy na
Make that http://skimmer.createforum.net _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
I think in the first exchange W7AA gets a Q. W7BB gets a "busted call" (is there a penalty?) In the second exchange I think W7AA gets a dupe (no penalty) and W7BB gets a Q. "I think, therefor I may b
-- I originated the proposal for this award to my Director back in late 2004. (Without the LoTW-centric provision.) Since then "the League's intent" has not been revealed, and seems to be a classifie
W3WN: Because the ARRL publicity announcing the award said so. "The Board voted to create a Triple Play Award. This new award, set to be implemented by January 2009, will be given to those amateurs w
W3WN: What "judgement" is in error? What should be "reversed"? 73, de Hans, K0H _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
N4ZR: Obviously CQ (or ARRL, or Contest-Sponsor-XYZ) needs my logs to score their contest. But I could make a pretty good argument that those logs are a private document transacted between me and the
is You're absolutely correct, Albert, as far as you've stated the situation. But of course there are more options than "if you don't like the rules, then just buzz off, creep". One of those other op
the of is Hi Bob, Off reflector K1AR asked a similar question, so I'll just cut and paste that exchange below: _______________________________________________________ K1AR Question: Hans, As a guy w
Note to K1AR: See below. I rest my case. 73, Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
KR2Q: having their ?secrets? revealed. That's got to be one of the most mean-spirited and bloated-head statements I've ever seen on this reflector! Repeating what I said in email to one of the contes
where Bob, This is one of those "you're wrong and I'm right" arguments that can go on forever and forever and forever, so I'll just have to introduce the mathematical proof. It is obvious, even to K
Bob, I'll take that to mean that you've searched them all (or at least the top 10% in your competitive category) and found nothing unique? 73, de Hans, K0HB _________________________________________
But.... but..... but.... Bob, you haven't been following along. I've already provided mathematical proof that I am right and that you are wrong and that you are right and that I am wrong, and that w
Thank you, Captain Obvious. I was attempting to cut the tension on this issue with a tongue-in-cheek parody, but I see it's far too serious an issue to be the subject of humor. CU in NAQP, 73, de Han
My understanding is that it would NOT get automatically bounced in any contest, but that if that one Q "put you over the top" of another competitor, that it would be "hand massaged" to determine if l
No, I think the BN4000 will look like a DC short in all directions to an ohm-meter. But if the BN4000 is being taken out of service, you can remove the "slab" cover and visually examine the wiring I
If what VE1DT says is true, then ignore my previous message. I'd always assumed the 4000 was just a beefier version of the BN86 which is a traditional "wound on toroid" design. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- h