Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Steve: 2016 ]

Total 2016 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Off Times (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:28:18 -0400
Yes, it does look like the NAQP administrator applied a more onerous interpretation than the SS administrator. Just to clarify, it you have a QSO at 0030Z, and your next QSO is at 0100Z, both the NAQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00786.html (8,395 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] NAQP Plaque (score: 1)
Author: <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:13:33 -0400
I might have to try RTTY. I've been in numerous NAQP's and Sprints and never got paper or anything, ever. They're still a lot of fun, though! 73 Steve K0SR ___________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00851.html (6,822 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] Improving scores, etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:59:48 +0100
While there's nothing quite like having an Elmer in the neighborhood, being invited to operate or observe at a "serious" M/M or M/S, visiting a super-station like W3LPL or N4AR or going through the "
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00859.html (10,209 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating Methods or Equipment? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:48:10 -0400
No - That UP4L score was incorrectly posted to 3830. That 7201 is the number of QSO points, not the number of SSB QSO's ! The correct posting should have been: Call: UP4L Total: 1614 0 187 Total Scor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00873.html (10,934 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Yaesu FTDX9000D review (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:05:49 -0400
i think any serious DX'r might be interested in this as well. while fiddling around with the second VFO using dual watch is nice, if i see a packet spot on 20m, i can park on "radio" on that freq kee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00883.html (7,860 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718 (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:22:12 -0400
Bob, The FT-920 is a contest-worthy radio. I used the 920 once in a serious contest effort, and was pleasantly surprised. Several serious contesters I know use them, and are very happy with them. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00906.html (9,709 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] W2SC - 48 hours (score: 1)
Author: <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:12:51 -0400
And then there are some of us who live in places that don't have 48 hours of propagation, even during "good" years. Try staying in the chair when you aren't able to hear any DX at all. A 36 hour time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00945.html (7,312 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:44:11 +0000
Hello W4TV, Is the address stored in the FCC database enough proof of the identity of the applicant? Why shall I send photocopies of my license and passport to prove who I am while you, US hams, don'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01103.html (10,954 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:14:01 -0400
That is precisely my issue. After navigating my way through the original application procedure and then later figuring out how to renew, I suffered some computer problems. Apparently the files I had
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01120.html (9,210 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:58:48 +0000
Hello Jim, Yep, I guess ARRL would send the postcard to the address listed in the FCC database. I am telling you that I won't register because I want to register using my main, italian homecall...unt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01131.html (9,959 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:04:38 +0000
Hello W4TV, I would consider the address stored in ARRL files and that I've used for many years (prior to the LotW) to send us$ and my qsl cards to Newington and receive back my qsl cards and DXCC pa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01132.html (11,067 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] May CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 12:58:03 -0400
Before you start messing with the time period, keep in mind two things: 1) We had a major geomagnetic storm in progress during the May Sprint. I presume you all noticed the fluttery signals on 40 and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00012.html (7,900 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest] Indiana QSO party (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 01:59:54 +0100
Am I the only OM who would like to see the Indiana QSO party scheduled on a weekend other than Kentucky Derby weekend? In spite of being in Kentucky, Derby is a HUGE event for many people in Southern
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00048.html (7,443 bytes)

34. [CQ-Contest] CQWW PHONE UBNs (score: 1)
Author: "Steve GW4BLE" <GW4BLE@btconnect.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 22:30:07 -0000
Had an email yesterday to say UBN report was available - so presumably results are imminent. It's interesting, as a Writelog user, to be able to playback the audio from any contact and see if it chec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00159.html (8,242 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dream Radio One......unveiled at Dayton ??? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 05:21:16 +0100
Actually, Paul Harvey says "You know what the news is...in a moment you'll hear the rest of the story" (we carry Mr. Harvey on our news talk station, 84 WHAS) ...not to take anything away from the hu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00163.html (9,038 bytes)

36. [CQ-Contest] UBN (score: 1)
Author: "Steve.Root@culligan.com" <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:35:18 +0100
I can envision several different scenarios where I would get penalized by the log checkers through no fault of my own. I'm going to lose points for mistakes I didn't make. It's unavoidable. But isn't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00269.html (10,915 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Penalties (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 13:08:12 -0400
Enough already ! Can we please go QRT on this thread ? At least for a year or two, when K3BU is certain to bring it up again ? If we keep this going, Yuri is certain to bring up another of his tired,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00270.html (8,965 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2005 Dayton Forum Wrap Up (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:07:45 +0100
NT5C is right on. WHEREVER these forums wind up in the future, they should be held at the same venue. While the room was nicer at Clowne Plaza...and all we had to do was run up to our room after the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00051.html (10,544 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dayton and the forum issues (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 03:08:07 +0100
The Hamvention should consider Louisville, KY. The Kentucky Fair and Exposition Center offers something like 5 million square feet of sparkling clean exposition area, meeting rooms, banquet facilitie
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00071.html (13,776 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] vhf qso party (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:42:20 +0100
Four bands or fewer. Complete rules are on page 99, May QST. 73, Mark, K9GX Elizabeth, IN EM78ad _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00163.html (9,820 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu