Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dave@pkministrywebs.com: 144 ]

Total 144 documents matching your query.

61. [CQ-Contest] SCQP Tentative Scores/Received Logs (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:49:55 -0500
Hello... We've received 212 logs for the SCQP so far. The log submission deadline is March 27th. I just added the I just added the "2017 Received Logs" page to the SCQP website at www.scqso.com If yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00271.html (7,565 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO Categories (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:22:01 -0400
The 5 day log submission requirement makes sending in a log difficult. There have times when I've had to hand log due to problems with sw etc... Converting the log to a 'readable' format, ie cabrillo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00287.html (10,394 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] Appropriate wait time for contest results? (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:48:26 -0400
HI Everone... I'm enjoying this thread....I share Tom's view... i manage the SCQP contest scoring and our goal is to complete the scoring as soon as possible... As Tom mentioned, we receive cabrillo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00067.html (15,896 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting explanation from CQWW blog (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:01:17 -0400
I think the best solution is to allow self-spotting without conditions for all "assisted' categories. I agree with Mike that it's impossible to control any station from being spotted by another stati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00263.html (21,143 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:10:43 -0400
Great comments... How about this scenario..... I start working the contest without a recording knowing that I would not be able to give it a 'competitive' effort due to the fact that my wife and I ar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00293.html (12,180 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 20:39:49 -0400
Bob, Thanks for giving the participants more insight into what's happening behind the 'closed doors' of the contest. I'm an admin for the SCQP and I can identify with your philosophy etc. In early 20
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00319.html (18,777 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] What is Multi to you? (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 09:09:47 -0400
I remember receiving my first "First Place SC" award in the 1978 Novice Roundup.... One of my competitors was Trey WN4KKN (overall standings). The NR was the perfect format kids...the rookie roundup
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00101.html (17,747 bytes)

68. [CQ-Contest] From the mailbox... 2016 NYQP - WN4AFP (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 16:21:36 -0400
HI Everyone.... I received a beautiful plaque from the 2016 NYQP today... I challenge all of you guys to shoot for this one in the 2017 event... Special thanks to the Rochester DX Association for spo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00105.html (7,701 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] Copying exchanges in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:35:25 -0400
After being off the air for many years, my first contest was in 2013. I was thrilled when I thought that i worked China BY2T during the event... I later found it that it was 6Y2T. I was glad to work
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00197.html (9,891 bytes)

70. [CQ-Contest] South Carolina QSO Party Results Posted (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:37:25 -0400
The SCQP results are now available on our website at www.scqso.com Thanks to all of y'all who participated! 73s Dave WN4AFP SCQP Team Leader _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00336.html (6,702 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] I hate ITU prefills (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:12:53 -0400
I agree 100% with Tree. I was away from contesting for many years and returned in 2013. One of the things I noticed was the use of pre-fills in contests. In Chapter 1 of my ham career, contest ops co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00359.html (9,960 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Contest Changes for 2017-2018 - Sept QST p91 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 22:09:27 -0400
HI Bart, I read through the ARRL contest changes and one change related to my normal contest operation. *"Logged frequency*: HF contest entries competing for awards as category leaders *are encourage
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00133.html (11,048 bytes)

73. [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 10:42:32 -0400
The top 25 players (according to 3830scores.com) in the NAQP CW contest were running SO2R. Congrats to N9NB a SO1R op who broke the chain of SO2R scores.. The concern I saw was that there were no SO1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00058.html (7,452 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 16:33:50 -0400
Hi Steve, Excellent numbers in NAQP! Yes this contest is perfect for SO2R. I think that SO2R ops are amazing and it should be used and enjoyed. 73s Dave AFP -- Dave Edmonds PK Ministry Webs 864.288.6
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00073.html (9,508 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 17:19:56 -0400
Excellent comments Trent! Dave AFP -- Dave Edmonds PK Ministry Webs 864.288.6678 dave@pkministrywebs.com www.pkministrywebs.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00078.html (11,568 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 18:18:56 -0400
Thanks Bob... I've never had scores anywhere near your excellent NAQP scores, but I still love to compete as I can with anyone... SO1R, SO2R or SO3V etc... They usually are up there on the top, but o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00079.html (11,637 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:23:48 +0000
I could not agree more with Kelly's comment about operator skills. I wasn't active when the major contests created the assisted category. Why was it added? (If Al Gore was a ham, he would have probab
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00098.html (16,645 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R - 3830scores.com Listings (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:03:19 -0400
Thanks Bruce! This is an excellent addition to the 3830scores.com contest results... Now we can visually compare the SO1R and SO2R... 73s Dave WN4AFP -- Dave Edmonds PK Ministry Webs 864.288.6678 dav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00107.html (12,027 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:43:46 -0400
Agree Kelly.... There's nothing worse than replying to a SO2R "run" who would rather work a few more stations on the "busier" band before responding to your call...and you know that they can hear you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00180.html (16,073 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Tennessee QSO Party 2017 - Sunday September (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 23:03:27 -0400
When we redesigned the South Carolina QSO Party in 2015, we made many changes, but there were two that were important to increased activity and excitement. 1. Allowed in-state stations to work SC cou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00032.html (17,834 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu