Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:hhamwv@gmail.com: 246 ]

Total 246 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:50:40 -0500
W1AEX already beat you to it, at least for SSB. In the spirit of getting into the proper frame of mind for ARRL Phone, you can view his "Hall of Infamy" at: http://www.w1aex.com/hoi/hall_of_infamy.ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00128.html (9,344 bytes)

102. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open Letter to VE Contesters (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:18:25 -0500
To everyone concerned about the "Canadian Advantage": There's no one "fighting it out up 10kHz" on 160. You could relax and enjoy the CQ160 Phone contest this weekend. The spectrum allocations are id
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00228.html (9,953 bytes)

103. Re: [CQ-Contest] JA's long time passing (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:06:43 -0500
Some pretty good JA rates are still available from the west coast. Last September N6RO in the CQWW RTTY reported that from his 2-operator multi-multi that 780 JA QSOs were completed out of 2806, or a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00010.html (10,412 bytes)

104. Re: [CQ-Contest] How much is a dB worth ? (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:18:58 -0500
I would postulate that the worth of a dB is not linear, but rather, there is a tipping point. If Tim was using a beam at 50-70 feet on the high bands, I think his results would be more in line with t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00013.html (12,540 bytes)

105. [CQ-Contest] CR2X Bids Good-Bye With Multi-Multi This Weekend (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 17:26:30 -0500
Marrti OH2BH announced that this weekend's ARRL DX SSB will be last major operation from CR2X: http://www.arrl.org/news/view/azores-beacon-cr2x-to-bid-farewell-in-the-2016-arrl-international-dx-ssb-c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00045.html (7,136 bytes)

106. [CQ-Contest] Youth in Contesting (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 23:42:39 -0400
Those interest in youth in contesting may be interested to read April CQ Magazine's Contesting Column, in which I look at what is being done in IARU Region 1 to promote ham radio and contesting. Ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00214.html (8,620 bytes)

107. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posture for contests (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:17:01 -0400
I observed that in Denmark, standing or adjustable standing/sitting desks are in almost every office. Last year I started using them myself. Mine are motorized desks that go up-and-down to any reason
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00274.html (9,884 bytes)

108. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO B4 (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:16:52 -0400
Times were different "back in the day". Prefixes sometimes were omitted or misplaced on paper dupe sheets. And any unmarked dupes in the log incurred a penalty. I remember a late Saturday afternoon 4
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00288.html (9,258 bytes)

109. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:18:37 -0400
Lest anyone be misled: in 2016, the CQ160 contest (CW *& SSB*) in ONLY the *single-operator assisted* category allowed use of a remote receiver *if (and only if)* the remote receiver was located with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00141.html (10,096 bytes)

110. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: A US Petition to remove CW only subbands (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 23:40:14 -0400
Would it really change anything? Most countries don't have sub bands imposed by legal regulation. Outside the U.S. *most* hams more or less abide by the IARU band recommendations and custom, knowingl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00058.html (9,551 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] alpha amps (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 09:22:35 -0400
Steve, Alpha very recently was acquired by a 3-person investment group the majority owner of which is Mike, N8WFF (or one of the entities that he controls). The new legal name is Alpha RF Systems LLC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-05/msg00163.html (8,686 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] Early DX'ing and contesting (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:23:52 -0400
There is some great history on the websites of the "Big 3" east coast contest clubs. PVRC: http://www.pvrc.org click on "history" in the menu FRC: http://gofrc.org/frctest/node/39 YCCC: http://www.yc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00051.html (8,885 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] Web Reporting of Contest Results (WAS: sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service) (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:15:38 -0400
Results were moved to the Web. I'd say that the results and analyses for the major contests today, including the ARRL's, are far better for having unlocked the opportunities presented by the Web. Muc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00090.html (12,599 bytes)

114. Re: [CQ-Contest] Printed scores and spatial concepts (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 16:34:50 -0400
You mean ike this? http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest%20Line%20Scores/2015/2015-ARRL-DX-CW-PLS-23Jul2015-Version2_0.pdf 73, Dave K3ZJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00100.html (10,416 bytes)

115. [CQ-Contest] KR2Q New CQWW DX Contest Director (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 07:45:56 -0400
Congratulations to Doug, KR2Q, the new CQWW DX Contest Director. Thanks for taking this on. http://cqnewsroom.blogspot.com And thanks also to Randy, K5ZD, for his years of service. 73, Dave K3ZJ ____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00006.html (7,277 bytes)

116. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 17:26:53 -0400
Doug, KR2Q, the new CQWW Contest Director, has implemented a triumvirate leadership structure for the Committee's work. Scott, W4PA, and Bob, W5OV, join Doug to share in leading the Committee. More i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00049.html (7,222 bytes)

117. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re computer switching of beverages (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:52:50 -0400
Jack, Not only is it practical, but old technology. If you have a MIMO WiFi router, for one example, that is one of its functions -- selecting the best direction through electronically steered fixed
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00303.html (8,203 bytes)

118. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest preferred segments in WAE (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:02:49 -0400
This is not a trivial matter for those competing to qualify forWRTC2018, since disqualification from WAEDC also disqualifies one from competing at WRTC2018. The rule is susceptible to being read eith
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00027.html (12,763 bytes)

119. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Category Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 11:02:17 -0400
I was with you until the end quote. There IS a "terrible way to win": undetected cheating. < > _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00065.html (9,177 bytes)

120. [CQ-Contest] Log what was sent (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:11:38 -0400
The CQWW rules' FAQ specifically addresses this issue. The CQWPX FAQ is identical with regard to cut numbers (zones are not used in WPX). _____________ http://www.cqww.com/rules_faq.htm: Q: I work a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-09/msg00219.html (8,832 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu