Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n8xx@arrl.org: 188 ]

Total 188 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Submission Times (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:11:41 -0400
Maybe we should do like with the WRTC teams - the log is confiscated minutes after the contest. Since we don't have monitors at each station, how about "one must send the log, as is, within an hour o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00306.html (8,044 bytes)

82. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log submission time (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:24:44 -0400
Paul: I'll second your sediment. I'm sitting here looking at a nice certificate from the IARU 2011 HF Championship, for "FIRST PLACE SINGLE OPERATOR CW ONLY QRP MICHIGAN SECTION ZONE 8" I made about
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00340.html (9,457 bytes)

83. Re: [CQ-Contest] No CWOpen Score Report on 3830 (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 12:16:15 -0400
There's three of them the first (and last) time I looked. Mebbe you jumped the gun. On 9/2/2012 12:00 PM, Georgek5kg@aol.com wrote: Message: 2 Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 12:14:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Georgek
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00016.html (7,639 bytes)

84. [CQ-Contest] Submissions for CWOps OPen (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 18:07:25 -0400
I have three logs, each labeled N8XX.log for the three sessions of CW OPS Open. I see only one "submission" page for this contest. How do I differentiate between the three sessions in submitting the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00019.html (6,751 bytes)

85. [CQ-Contest] Mulan DXC Worked All Chinese Provinces Contest 2012 Oct. 6, from 0000-2359 UTC. (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:42:31 -0400
Any chitter chatter about this "First Annual Worked All Provinces (WAPC) of China DX Contest? I just noticed it on the WA7BNM contest calendar and decided to look it up. I tried searching for "Mulan
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00045.html (7,768 bytes)

86. [CQ-Contest] Two questions about CQ WW SSB contest logging (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:55:04 -0400
I admit to making an "after contest" adjustment of my cabrillo file for the recent CQ WW SSB contest. I wasn't quite "with it" when I started the contest, and gave one fellow a "Zone 5" instead of my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00307.html (9,766 bytes)

87. Re: [CQ-Contest] Two questions about CQ WW SSB contest logging (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:05:00 -0400
Thanks, Randy: With all the "snarky, 'holier than thou' folks on this reflector who like to split hairs and stand on their high horse of hypocrisy" I figured I'd better ask the questions, lest someon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00324.html (12,390 bytes)

88. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why is he ashamed of his call??? (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 12:12:06 -0500
One very easy way to encourage folks to ID would be to NOT "Tailgate" the stations who do NOT ID between each contact. If a station doesn't get a call immediately, the op WILL ID Otherwise, "patience
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00236.html (9,976 bytes)

89. [CQ-Contest] Warmup for the ARRL 160 M contest? (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:57:45 -0500
For a warmup to the ARRL 160 meter contest, why not consider the QRP ARCI Top Band Sprint this Wednesday. It's held on Thursday, November 29, 0000Z to 0600Z. (Wednesday in most of these United States
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00247.html (7,337 bytes)

90. [CQ-Contest] Zombie Shuffle, Demcember 21, 2012 (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:37:52 -0500
How many folks know that the end of the world will be December 21, 2012 (At least some folks who studied a rock containing the Mayan Calendar have come to that conclusion.) You may have heard of NØD,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00150.html (8,704 bytes)

91. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP scoring (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:34:04 -0500
Hurrah for "blood and guts" operation! Yes, by all means, we should, no, we MUST penalize folks for the errors of their ways. Lettuce go all the way, have "monitors" at all the "big guns" stations to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00059.html (9,332 bytes)

92. [CQ-Contest] An Invasion of QRP Ops is about to begin (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:47:13 -0500
CQ NAQP OPS CQ NAQP OPS CQ NAQP OPS Be informed that I've recruited a total of 19 QRP ops. for the January CW event tomorrow. "Probably" more than 50% of these have never partooken of the North Ameri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00070.html (7,415 bytes)

93. [CQ-Contest] What's all the talk about "Frequency owner?" (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:39:33 -0500
Several times while I was "running" during the recent NAQP another op would plop down on the frequency (NOTE, I did NOT say it was "MY" frequency because no one "owns" a frequency") and called CQ. On
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00117.html (8,788 bytes)

94. Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:17:12 -0500
How about "We've done it that way from the days of sp*rk gap. So, if it's good enough for the sp*rkies, its good enough for us. ? :) BTW, how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? 72/73 de n8xx
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00224.html (8,692 bytes)

95. [CQ-Contest] CQ 160 Multipliers (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:03:44 -0500
OK, Iam NOT massaging any data in any log, I don't even have the log. Sooooo, IF you're one of the "sticklers" for such things, send me a "warning missile back, or hit the delete key. But, Iwas opera
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00284.html (8,496 bytes)

96. Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-Assisted vs. Assisted (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 06:12:14 -0500
Amen! A variation - I hook my ancient boat anchor (Drake TR5) to my "portable" antenna - which varies in height with the amount to trouble I take to put it up after the last "mini-dxpedition" and plu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00362.html (9,666 bytes)

97. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rules off the table ? (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:30:20 -0500
Ditto, but double, when one is running QRP. Sometimes I even get noticed toward the end of a contest (Sweepsteaks or otherwise) during a "run." :) 72/73 de n8xx Hg QRP >99.44% of the time Message: 1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00153.html (9,160 bytes)

98. Re: [CQ-Contest] Keep your CTY files updated (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:37:37 -0500
Shucks, I though "external help" wasn't permitted for the Single Op categories. Why isn't the use of a "scavenged" list of locations from previous contests considered "external help?" All this chitte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00560.html (8,771 bytes)

99. [CQ-Contest] PSY QSY???? (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:18:06 -0500
If someone asks me "PSE QSY" I generally say "What do you mean? Why are you moving your run frequency? You are doing the running." All too many "so called top" contesters don't even know the differen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00619.html (8,879 bytes)

100. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:18:31 -0500
Because I like CW contests much, much better. But, it's somewhat of a challenge and a thrill to be able to sneak my call in amongst the cacophony of would-be operators who believe that running 1.5++
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00086.html (9,331 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu