Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:sawyered@earthlink.net: 493 ]

Total 493 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:51:18 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Actually, from looking at my UBN's, I do not recall being penalized for the other guy missing my call. I see a few N1RR vs. my N1UR and I still have credit for the Q because it is close, at the same
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00030.html (9,310 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Contest Complaining (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:06:56 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
I can speak for myself, and I am sure many others, in saying that complaints of receiving no certificates after 3 or more years from a contest have been sent directly to the CQ Contest Organizers. If
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00211.html (8,121 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest DXpeditions in a suitcase (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 08:48:25 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
I can partially confirm what AH8DX said about this. I did C6ARS in 2001 CQ WW CW, SOAB LP unassisted, number 7 world. It was done at a nice little station on the beach with a 50 ft tower, a TH5DX, 2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00350.html (8,146 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] sub categories (Cruiser Class, etc.) (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:21:48 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Why don't the interested parties start by identifying yourselves on this reflector so at least you can compete amongst yourself in an "unoffical" subcategory. It would be a lot easier to get the spon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00388.html (7,416 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters on CW (was: FCC on CW) (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:03:26 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Great Post Ward. I couldn't agree more. I also feel this way. CW is its own special unique thing that people need to see and become interested in positively. I believe that enough can, and will, if w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00401.html (8,684 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] OH plan on WRTC competition (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 13:59:21 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
I think the concept is great. Have a regional competition and have the best represent the country in WRTC. I wish the US clubs would do the same. Especially at 100W (Just ain't the same, boys, with t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00688.html (8,105 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest DXpeditions in a suitcase (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 08:48:25 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
I can partially confirm what AH8DX said about this. I did C6ARS in 2001 CQ WW CW, SOAB LP unassisted, number 7 world. It was done at a nice little station on the beach with a 50 ft tower, a TH5DX, 2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00939.html (8,146 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] sub categories (Cruiser Class, etc.) (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:21:48 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Why don't the interested parties start by identifying yourselves on this reflector so at least you can compete amongst yourself in an "unoffical" subcategory. It would be a lot easier to get the spon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00977.html (7,416 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters on CW (was: FCC on CW) (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:03:26 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Great Post Ward. I couldn't agree more. I also feel this way. CW is its own special unique thing that people need to see and become interested in positively. I believe that enough can, and will, if w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00990.html (8,684 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] e QSL (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 13:48:56 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Myself, I have been "on the other side" for over 20,000 Qs as FP0, C6, PJ2, XX9, and 9M6. In my opinion, the discussion about QSLing and comparing it to contest logs is "apples and oranges". The cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00035.html (11,319 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] license class and m-m ops (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 13:19:54 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
This is a pretty interesting discussion that from my observation affects over half of the m/m, m/s, and m2 stations that I know of. In reading the FCC Part 97, it is quite grey as to the interpretati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00102.html (8,753 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2005 Dayton Forum Wrap Up (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:54:12 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
To continue on what Bob, N5NJ, was saying...the idea is for the vendors to follow where the customers are, guys, not for the vendors to tell the customers to come back to where they are. On one hand,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00092.html (10,321 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Re: The Battle of the callsigns (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:57:34 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Jose, Fascinating post (as usual), thanks. Of course in Al's case (D4B), at the speed he's transmitting it, its even less time than this analysis. I picked N1UR for the very reasons you speak of. Cou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00306.html (7,963 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] 14.300 discussion (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:48:09 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
I was going to write a long response to this but all of my opinions have already been vioced. I most agree with Ken, WM5R's post. The ARRL and CQ have already established 17M as Contest free. You hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00422.html (8,852 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MM Net (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:39:05 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Since it is quite obvious from these posts and logical for anyone who has contested on 20M SSB, there is a very high probability that someone is on 14.300 Running EU or US at 1100Z when the MM nets s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00455.html (8,018 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Rules W/VE (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
I agree with Bob, KQ2M, and have thought so for years. In makes absolutely no sense for Ws and VEs to be "competing" in the same category with the different phone rules on 80/40/20/15. It wouldn't ch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00077.html (8,370 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Barking Up the Wrong ARRL DX Tree (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:32:47 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
I, for one, have contested from W5, W8 and now W1. There is no question that the east coast is easier than W8 and W5 to win the contest or get into the top ten in ARRL DX or CQ WW as a SOAB effort. S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00093.html (10,751 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] How about ditching ARRL DX top 10 completely? (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:39:58 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
I disagree with Scott, W4PAs suggestion about ditching the top 10 boxes and I don't know where the thread started suggesting that the only way they exist is in the write-up. Scott, if you look up on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00165.html (10,707 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ2T availability for IARU (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:19:36 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
I wanted to put in a plug for this world class station. I operated IARU from PJ2T in 2002 as PJ2E in the HP CW only class. I came in #10 in the world and this effort which would have probably moved m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00372.html (7,715 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dayton Forum Rooms for DX/Contesting (score: 1)
Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
I totally agree with N2IC's chronology of events. Friday - HARA with flea, Saturday - Crowne Plaza, Sunday - Rain Date for Flea. It will be interesting to see if attendance at HARA is noticably "low"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00406.html (9,067 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu