Mail Archive Search: <+from:sawyered@earthlink.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:sawyered@earthlink.net: 493 ]

Total 493 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] Re: SO2R Boxes (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 08:37:51 -0400 (EDT); I would look at the DX Doubler from Top Ten Devices. It is an excellent unit, only has the switching and not the CW and Voice Keyer, and has a built-in CW keying interface to key your solid state rig; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00009.html (7,601 bytes)
42. [CQ-Contest] Re: QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 19:12:57 -0400 (EDT); No arguement of the IDing thread but here's an additional possibility if you are listening in on the DX station: 2 mins with no ID DX: QRZ ME: N1UR DX: N1UR 5933 ME: 5905 DX: QRZ And your thinking, h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00039.html (8,134 bytes)
43. [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ WW RTTY SPOT REPORT (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:39:03 -0400 (GMT-04:00); Thanks David for exposing these bozos for what they are.....cheaters. Unfortunately, the problem won't go away, despite your noble efforts, until someone from the ARRL or CQWW can answer the question; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00058.html (7,763 bytes)
44. [CQ-Contest] Re: LOTW Again! (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:26:40 -0400 (GMT-04:00); I agree with the storyline of G3XTT except for one "unmentioned" aspect. The availability of a QSL card, for sure, but the availability "to the masses" cheap (ie, the bureau), no. I for one will be t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00081.html (9,220 bytes)
45. [CQ-Contest] Fw: On Line Logs (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:06:46 -0500 (GMT-05:00); Is anyone else bothered by the fact that on line logs are being made available in various modes before the contest submission deadlines. I make no comment on anyone's intention being anything less th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00193.html (9,053 bytes)
46. RE: [CQ-Contest] Fw: On Line Logs (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:08:22 -0500 (GMT-05:00); No, but if they are in your log but you discover that you are not in there's, you pull it out and avoid the penalty when cross checked. There was a long thread on post contest log improvements a whil; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00203.html (10,568 bytes)
47. [CQ-Contest] Re: Improper Spotting (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:47:35 -0500 (GMT-05:00); If all the guys chiming in about spots were spending the time doing antenna work or studying propagation charts, maybe they would be have better scores. Come on guys, lets get back to radio, antennas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00115.html (8,126 bytes)
48. [CQ-Contest] Amber 5500 (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:03:27 -0500 (GMT-05:00); I have come across this fine piece of equipment and would like to use it to do some home brew amplifier testing and optimizing. Does anyone happen to have a manual for it? Pay for copying and shippin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00269.html (7,407 bytes)
49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Owning a Frequency (3830) (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:07:48 -0400 (GMT-04:00); As an avid listener to 3830 after the major DX contests (great way to get a quick sanity check of your score if you have last years results available as you hear KC1XX, K3LR, W3LPL et. al. check in),; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00392.html (7,289 bytes)
50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Greying of SS CW (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:21:34 -0500 (EST); Its hard to argue that there is a big wave of us who were first licensed in the 50s/60s/70s are active contesters, however, I wonder how much the SS contest is representative of the whole contest gro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00334.html (7,391 bytes)
51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competitor Friendly Contesting (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:18:33 -0500 (EST); It seems that we can never agree on this particular topic. I also agree with the analogy of running. I am a runner. I run 5Ks primarily and have done a couple of 10Ks. I have never done a half marath; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00500.html (10,770 bytes)
52. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competitor Friendly Contesting (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:06:00 -0500 (GMT-05:00); Thanks Gerry. I understand your point of view and respect it. It would seem that 3830 is somewhat addressing your interest in comparing "apples to apples" from a time standpoint. I remember Ward Silv; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00536.html (10,578 bytes)
53. [CQ-Contest] FT1000MP Mk V Settings using DX Heil Mic (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:02:17 -0500 (EST); Here is what I have found. For 160 - 40, the Mic is at 9 O'Clock and the compressor is at 10 O'Clock. This is a really good setting for me. For 10 - 20, the Mic gain goes up to about 10 O'Clock and t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00589.html (7,733 bytes)
54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero point Qs (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:51:53 -0500 (EST); I am also not in favor of changing the rules to make CQ WW a hybrid of WPX and CQ WW. CQ WW is the Best contest because it is what it is. However, I do understand the zero point Q issue of the big mu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00802.html (7,548 bytes)
55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero point Qs (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:28:20 -0500 (GMT-05:00); Not in my book. Leave it the way it is. Just eliminate the absurdity of needing to work your own country for a zero point mult. Stew Perry is a fun contest. Should we change its rules to look like CQ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00806.html (9,520 bytes)
56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Point Qs (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 06:59:00 -0500 (GMT-05:00); As we discuss ways to change CQ WW (which I don't understand since it is by far the greatest contest for me and was that way when I lived in W5 and K8 too), some interesting ideas are being presented; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00008.html (8,522 bytes)
57. [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheating (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:18:03 -0500 (GMT-05:00); If you really want to nail packet cheaters...do it in Sweepstakes where it isn't allowed for single op or ARRL 10 etc. I think the easiest way to cross the ethics 101 boundry mentioned by K4XS is to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00302.html (8,033 bytes)
58. [CQ-Contest] Casual Contesting (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:03:06 -0500 (GMT-05:00); I must say that I am surprised by some comments about casual contesting. I often times will be tuning the band on some random weekend and hear a contest going on EU, SA, Asia, State QSO party or what; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00441.html (8,092 bytes)
59. Re: [CQ-Contest] What should I do? (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:27:19 -0500 (GMT-05:00); I have attempted this "outing" before with a Contest Organizer without success. The best method, unless it is lterally recorded (which seems to be about the only thing which will get a sponsor to do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00561.html (8,747 bytes)
60. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP/Low Power Settings (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 12:18:24 -0500 (GMT-05:00); I also have an FT-1000MP Mk V (and an FT-990 as radio 2). What I have found is that if I set the RF Power using key down reading (ie 100W CW) and use decent "contest" compression on SSB, the peak hol; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00017.html (7,542 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]