Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w8ji@w8ji.com: 132 ]

Total 132 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 07:32:33 -0500
<<<I am not surprise you have a lot of YBs in your log. The path between you both should be easier. I have received private e-mail from several people confirming condx were tricky and other stations
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00042.html (9,454 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:18:21 -0500
<<<Yes I agree with you that condx can vary greatly with only hundred of miles, especially when condx are tricky. That's why I needed several opinions because it only has a statistical value. I was n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00043.html (8,682 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB (CQ WPX) : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:16:09 -0400
I have two (temporary) conclusions from this : - On the morning perhaps the path is not fully SP or LP and usually NA stations are bearing to JA, not me, making things harder to understand. - Around
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00216.html (9,697 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] MMSN Protection Petition (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:42:50 -0400
The way he spells, uses plurals, or uses the incorrect spelling of words that sounds the same(homophones) is enough for me. I can't get past that stupidity. :-) ______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00241.html (11,025 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] [AOCC] FCC Seeks Comments on Impediments toAmateurRadioCommunications (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:14:04 -0400
Also keep in mind what they told me. I was told, if comments are identical copies of multiple others, they sometimes count it as one comment. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00041.html (9,494 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] W6CF / W6CUF memories (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:21:02 -0400
He was a character. I very distinctly remember dealing with him from Ameritron when it was in Ohio. No matter what advice I gave, he did what he wanted. Despite warnings, because he could get big me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00052.html (8,334 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote contesting Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:39:25 -0400
For contests I care less. It obviously is a combination of operator and station, and the fact there is Internet between the two doesn't matter. For DXCC and other things, I think the rules are messe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00160.html (9,026 bytes)

68. [CQ-Contest] Amplifier repair warning (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:25:51 -0400
Several times over the past 30 years Hams have been hurt, or killed, poking around inside tube-type amps with power on. QST, with total disregard for common sense, even published an article suggestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00191.html (11,372 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D HUM in RX audio (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:15:37 -0400
Hi Bob, General tech info for contestors, I just hope it doesn't destroy the remote station and potential cheating complaining that is so interesting and exciting. :-) Years ago, when we did broadcas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00260.html (10,050 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] Aniother rules/remote RX issue (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 13:35:38 -0400
A single op unassisted wants to use a remote receiver to assist his operating, by learning what is on his frequency. I can't imagine that is OK, for several reasons. First, the operator would see cal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00191.html (12,336 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL CW 2012 (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 09:40:19 -0400
I think this highlights the real problem that no one wants to mention: Every field day I can recall, other than one club back when I was a teenager, breaks rules. For example, a radio club in a town
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00244.html (9,483 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mixer (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:14:45 -0400
Thank goodness, a non-volatile post. :-) I have a distribution system in my rooms. I use the speaker outputs of radios into a backwards connected 1-2 watt transistor output transformer, like one of t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00298.html (8,818 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mixer (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:54:37 -0400
Multiple loads requires a system that distributes audio, like a typical 70-volt line output system used for multiple speakers. If he wants multiple load channels from a single source, it has to be a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00304.html (8,414 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL single op definition (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:02:09 -0400
Supposedly, Herb did not actually operate. By definition, I can have an OPERATOR sit in my room and not be an actual OPERATOR . The only function of a control operator is to prevent or assume respon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00305.html (8,087 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mixer (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:12:05 -0400
There probably is the potential to drive 20 headsets with a single car stereo IC chip power amplifier. If you use a fairly high power (compared to the power headsets need) audio source with low sour
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00338.html (8,222 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] Estimating arrival angles? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:20:24 -0400
It varies million of times a second. :-) A horizontally polarized dipole, or Yagi, is only perfectly horizontal straight off the broadside of the element. I made that mistake installing a 160 dipole
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00355.html (11,034 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bandpass filter (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 21:53:55 -0400
A traditional bandpass filter does nothing for same-band overload or interference, because by definition it passes the entire band. The exception would be crystal or other very high Q narrow bandwid
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00008.html (9,260 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bandpass filter (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:00:32 -0400
Nearly all modern radios have excellent harmonic suppression, while external power amplifiers do not. If we have a second harmonic issue, a critically located stub or stubs, or a trap, is far more e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00013.html (10,590 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bandpass filter (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:28:09 -0400
40 milliwatts or so is a correct worse case for any amp, in or reasonably out-of-tune, unless someone homebrewed something terrible. Very few radios are damaged by 200 milliwatts, or 23 dBm. The dam
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00020.html (9,717 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bandpass filter (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 21:37:28 -0400
Fundamental power. That's no surprise if the antennas are real close in terms of wavelength. If you look at 160 meters, two dipoles 1/4 wave apart can have well over 20% of applied power into the RX
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00022.html (10,488 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu