Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+40m\s+lower\s+band\s+edge\s+SSB\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:12:29 -0600
For the USA it is 7.125, if I wanted to stay legal and keep my LSB signal in the US band I would want to not transmit any lower than say 7.127? Do I have this right? W0MU ____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00012.html (7,114 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 21:35:48 +0000
7.127 probably puts a fair amount of energy below 7.125, assuming your sob bandwidth is 2.4 kHz or better. I generally stay at or above 7.128. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00016.html (8,521 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 21:37:23 +0000
Make that "ssb bandwidth", damn autocorrect! HB -- 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his radio" _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00017.html (7,842 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:21:05 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Mike, The lower edge of your LSB signal is probably at least 2.5 kHz below your dial frequency. 7127 is too low, 7128 should be ok. 73 Frank W3LPL -- Original Message -- For the USA it is 7.125, i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00018.html (8,226 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 19:53:36 -0300
Won't/can't answer your question Mike as I am not a USA op, however I will say I heard a few W's calling some DX between 7100-7125....and even one or two below 7100 calling someone rare. (I presume t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00020.html (8,672 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 20:58:54 -0400
7.128 is the lowest I will go when in the US however I heard a number of US stations below that in last weekend's contest so I am wondering if the FCC rules have changed. A few US stations even calle
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00026.html (8,214 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: Mike Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 01:36:18 +0000 (UTC)
..... which is interesting, because I saw several US stations being spotted well BELOW 7125 kHz. Like 7060 kHz! I think a few people need to learn what the US band limits are... 73; Mike W7VO -- Orig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00028.html (9,380 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 21:21:23 -0700
Even 7128 is pushing it -- if you're TX with a 2.7 kHz filter and the low side of the filter is at 500 Hz, your RF -3dB points would be 7124.8 - 7127.5. Add another 200-400 Hz for filter skirts to ge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00031.html (9,121 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:39:56 +0100
Hi Mike, Maybe you're jumping the gun on this one. Could it be that those spots you saw were QRG's where US stations were listening and that they were transmitting above 7200kHz? Did you only see spo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00040.html (10,974 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 09:30:24 -0400
Mike, We had a few folks telling me we were out of band when we were in the 7075-7100 window we have here in KP2. I envy the VE and also most of the other country's 40M band plan. Tnx everyone for th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00043.html (10,071 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: Bill via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:43:40 -0400
I had the same happen to me when I operated from KH6. Some would tell me I was out of the band. Some would call me on my Xmit freq down on 7080. How did these guys get their licenses? K4XS/KH7XS In a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00044.html (8,747 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:30:03 -0400
Just to put a fine point on it, 7125 is the band edge. The FCC regs don't say "Don't go within 3 KHz of the band edge", but of course, technically, that makes perfect sense. There are obvious violati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00051.html (10,090 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: Mike Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:11:27 +0000 (UTC)
No, being US stations they were shown in my N1MM+ bandmap as "unworkable" (gray) spots, and weren't listed as anything "portable". There were several of them WELL below 7125 kHz. As I recall, they we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00052.html (12,336 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:49:58 -0600
The CQ WW DX Contest Committee is responsible for checking and adjudicating the contest entries. Entrants are expected to follow the rules and best amateur radio practices. Violation of the rules of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00053.html (11,847 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:23:17 -0400
Actually, Gerry, the FCC amateur rules are explicit on this very point. Section 97.307(b): "Emissions resulting from modulation must be confined to the band or segment available to the control operat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00060.html (11,347 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:34:19 -0400
Agreed. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00061.html (12,293 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m lower band edge SSB (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:52:41 -0400
I recently got out of 'band jail' by upgrading to Extra...What freedom it's been to enjoy the whole band to 3 Khz on the edges. I learned my lesson as a Novice when working PJ2PP on 21.099. I was usi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00065.html (13,496 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu