Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lists@applegatebroadband.net: 219 ]

Total 219 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Karlnet] KN-100/200 with PoE overheats (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 06:25:25 -0800
Sergey, you must use a fan. I use a chip cooler fan (2" dia.). I power mine off the header on the board. Works well then. Norm use
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00160.html (9,456 bytes)

22. Re: [Karlnet] Ubicomm Karlnet Clients (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:09:55 -0800
MapleNet (http://www.maplenet-inc.com/) has them. They have the Ubicom/KN-50 (Blackbird) radios. I've set up quite a few clients on them, and I'm pretty happy. I can recommend their i19 CPE, which is
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00200.html (9,339 bytes)

23. [Karlnet] Ping jitter problem---only one direction (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:08:44 -0700
I've noticed that pinging from any of our clients to the NOC results in pings all over the map, from 20mS-300mS. However, ping back from the NOC to the client, the pings are stable, and low, 8-30mS.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00027.html (8,038 bytes)

24. Re: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:24:55 -0700
Hi Bob, I think that I may be seeing the same thing. I noticed that sometime this summer as I added clients to our WIPOP the jitter from the clients to the AP/NOC really went bad (as previously menti
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00037.html (10,928 bytes)

25. Re: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:17:08 -0700
I'm sure you can. It may be that the problem showed up when I went to 4.43 on the base. I went the other way and upgraded all my clients to 4.43 while trying to fix this problem....no change. I haven
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00039.html (13,750 bytes)

26. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:15:53 -0700
No, it's time to start looking at Proxim's WORP, or some other vendor entirely. I'm considering adding WORP to the mix, starting with our backhaul. Proxim's MP.11a product is getting a close look. I
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00046.html (13,769 bytes)

27. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:07:34 -0700
Travis, what's the pricing on Canopy? Norm
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00050.html (14,304 bytes)

28. Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:19:04 -0700
Hi Chris, Perhaps it's a perception problem...but I've been noticing some pretty tough times on my VOIP phone as well, and I'm wondering where it's coming from. Do you have an alternative test I can
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00064.html (11,295 bytes)

29. [Karlnet] Coming soon, satellite competition 1.5M/.5 (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:58:37 -0700
I've been reading recently (or just looking under the bed at night :) ) about a VSAT satellite service that is slated to go online early 2004. This service is going to be 1.5-3.0M/500k, with a 300mS
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00077.html (10,897 bytes)

30. [Karlnet] Does the bw limits in the Ubicom firmware work? (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 19:27:27 -0700
I don't recall if this has been discussed before, but do the bandwidth limitations in the Karlnet TC bridge firmware for the Ubicom processor work? Norm
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00092.html (8,326 bytes)

31. Re: [Karlnet] Low Cost CPE (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:02:24 -0700
Hector, you might try the Ubicom device. I especially like the 19dB panel integrated with the radio ($280), although I'm having some trouble with one from a different vendor on signal strength (or co
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00097.html (8,082 bytes)

32. [Karlnet] .a radios (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:42:56 -0700
Can anyone confirm TC working with a 802.11a radio? I have a backhaul link that is currently .11b TC, that I'd love to upgrade to .11a and get some mileage on before winter hits up at the AP. (4500'
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00124.html (8,469 bytes)

33. [Karlnet] KN-200 PoE (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:01:26 -0700
I'm trying to power up one of the new KN-200 boards. I'm looking at the PoE specs in the User Guide, and it appears that you can use any voltage from 12-48vdc, and any polarity scheme on 4/5, 7/8. So
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00130.html (8,355 bytes)

34. Re: Ubicom TC Units and factory reset issues/questions, WET11's- was RE: [Karlnet] ofdm in 2.4ghz? (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 10:06:55 -0700
So, since the Ubicom/WET11 units have PRISM 2.5 radios in them, I wonder if it would be possible to substitute the higher power versions of those radios, i.e.; a 100mW PRISM 2.5 radio? I have just a
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00018.html (19,681 bytes)

35. [Karlnet] SR-4200 (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:43:09 -0700
I have a need for four wireless interfaces at a WIPOP (expanding from the existing two). One is going to be used for PtP backhaul, two for PtMP, and one for further expansion. I was considering using
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00044.html (8,780 bytes)

36. Re: [Karlnet] Increased Capacity (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 22:12:12 -0700
Caleb, what are you referring to as full? I've got a AP-1000 running base, with only 19 stations hanging off it (some of those are 1M/1M customers), and am seeing my ping times starting to climb and
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00085.html (10,562 bytes)

37. Re: [Karlnet] AP-1000 power usage !!! (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:21:18 -0700
Hi Robert, I believe that the one we have w/two 100mW PRISM2.5 radios slotted takes down about 10W. Norm
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00090.html (9,867 bytes)

38. Re: [Karlnet] Unbicom units lack of SNR testing? (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:32:30 -0700
I'd like to see this fixed also, if possible.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00107.html (8,934 bytes)

39. Re: [Karlnet] Poling and performing to the lowest denominator? (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:47:07 -0700
I'm also seeing this problem, and it's starting to be noticed by my customers. It needs to be fixed, fixed, fixed!!!! I didn't start to notice it until I started adding the new Ubicom CPEs to the net
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00112.html (10,244 bytes)

40. [Karlnet] Two CPEs associating with each other... (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 08:01:16 -0700
I've noticed that I have two RG/SR-4000 customers that show up on each others Wireless Link Test, in addition to the AP. The two customers are seperated by about a mile from each other. All are runni
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-08/msg00125.html (9,171 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu