My apologies, but I seem to be missing something. As of this writing, I have several "classic" pieces of hardware (serial 00-Ut, etc. indicates their manufacture was in 2000) running Karlnet's latest
I see about an average of 30 ms with 15 ROR (satellites) talking to 1 COR (base). The average is for all units total. 30% of them actually return a <10ms response! I am happy with this latency and am
Try YDI RG-ANT.. it's a combination rg and 18 db antenna.. great cpe! Kenneth "Scott" Myers Wireless Engineer smyers@telsouth.net (843) 842-7795 x 105 No doubt, I agree with that - the kn50 boards la
I have seen the feature "Wireless Scan" on the Karlnet 4.3 software. When I try to us it, it states my hardware does not support the feature. Perhaps this is the spectrum analysis/ network sniffer th
As far as I am aware, the current Karlnet 4.3 does not support 802.11a yet. It is in development and has an unslated release, although I suspect sometime soon, as the manuals for their software and t
Do you retract the statement about 802.11a not being PCMCIA compatible? Would seem like a wasted market to anyone with a laptop then, which, coincidentally, is the best client for wireless. Kenneth "
I would like to see the software support a manufacturer's card that is PCMCIA compatible with a/b/ and even possibly g support. I have about 50 units in operation in B and the idea that I can not upg
I have seen a/b cards manufactured with the traditional pcmcia adapter and have inquired to Atheros about the possibility of a card that exists in the market with their drivers, pcmcia support, and a
I am afraid I must fall on my sword, so to speak, in this case. It appears that bob is 100 percent correct about the compatibility issue. I slap myself for not realizing that for a radio push 5 GHZ i
Sorry Kevin and Bob. You are both correct. In an ISP network, it sounds great. I agree that Point to Multipoint is a great platform for wireless, especially when TurboCell is used. I think I am still
I am curious as well.. I can monitor snmp values through a MIB viewer, But I cannot "kick" the equipment into link test mode. I believe there is a value in snmp that is changed to initiate the test,
Good day to you. I have experience in the equipment you mention and can offer relation as way to help. I have a extremely similar network, with a piece of equipment running as a "COR master" (commonl
Heres a random off topic question (as stated before, I lack any other good known WISP mailing lists... suggestions?) Anyone have good/bad luck with 1 watt 2.4 amplification and picking up too much no
It's good to see Reg handling the Mailing List. I have spoken with him on numerous occasions in regards to technical issues both petty and complicated, and he has always been a great help. I'm lookin
I am the only one who gets spam from having my address on this mailing list? _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mail
Hee... I am glad I used an alias account, and saddened by the fact I didn't remove my footer with my real email address from the email with my real email address... (shhh... I think I hear spiders..)
I know this is a moot point as far as some networking is concerned, but I will put it out there anyways, if only to hear you all's thoughts. My network is 100% Lucent hardware with varrying versions
Good to hear. Does this include the "scan network" setting? I don't know (does anyone?) enough about how the config seeks karlnet equipment, although I have seen the packets. I could program the ip a
This is probably not the right mailing list to ask, but I figured in a collective group of WISPs, someone might have shared this experience. I have seen every now and then that a couple of my Lucent
-I am only actually trying to pass about 400k of throughput, although all my bandwidth shaping is done centrally. I will check the log, but this unit has been hard rebooted once or twice already, whi