My apologies, but I seem to be missing something. As of this writing, I
have several "classic" pieces of hardware (serial 00-Ut, etc. indicates
their manufacture was in 2000) running Karlnet's latest release, with
apparently no issues. Is this different than the upgrade you speak of?
Kenneth "Scott" Myers
Wireless Engineer
smyers@telsouth.net
(843) 842-7795 x 105
-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Peter Dordik
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:53 AM
To: Karlnet Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
Kevin told us (several months ago), that upgrade from orinoco firmware
(COR,
ROR) to Karlnet Base and Satellite will be soon.
I will be glad, if there will be upgrade for classic AP too (AP500,
AP1000) with
802.1x support. Any plans?
Peter
> Good day to you. I have experience in the equipment you mention and
can
> offer relation as way to help.
>
> I have a extremely similar network, with a piece of equipment running
as
> a "COR master" (commonly referred to as base in KarlNet lingo), and
> multiple "slaves" (referred to as satellites). Most of the
satellites
> in the network are 4.15 lucent/Orinoco software, which KarlNet wrote,
> and is the predecessor for the current KarlNet software. I have had
> both 4.15 base units 4.43 base units working with older satellites and
> they seem to respond well to it, with a common latency of around 30ms,
> and typical throughput of about 3-4 megs.
>
> Kenneth "Scott" Myers
> Wireless Engineer
> smyers@telsouth.net
> (843) 842-7795 x 105
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Blair Drew Davis
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:32 PM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
>
> Recently, with assistance from Ed at Karlnet, we found a work around
for
>
> a for a latency and packet loss issue.
>
> We operate a geographically large wisp in Allegan, MI. We use Lucent
> hardware for our towers and backbones, and various suppliers for our
> cpe.
>
> We have a mix of standard lucent software and Karlnet flashes.
>
> Using Karlnet Turbocell 4.43 as a COR in master mode to talk to a
Lucent
>
> ROR 4.15 in slave mode we get high latency, limited bandwidth and high
> packet loss. Placing the COR into non-polling mode fixed this, but
> limits this to a point to point link, not a point to multi point.
>
> Moving our equipment around has allowed us to have Lucent talking to
> Lucent and Karlnet talking to Karlnet in most areas.
>
> However, my question is, will a Lucent ROR/COR in master mode talk to
a
> Karlnet ROR in slave mode without the latency, bandwidth, and packet
> loss problems?
>
>
> --
> Blair Davis
> Computer Adjusters of Allegan
> www.computeradjusters.com
> (616) 673-0054
>
> AOL Instant Message Screen Name theory240
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|