Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent

To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
From: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Reply-to: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:27:19 -0600
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Whoa....wait a minute.....

You are telling me that I can now "upgrade" at the "upgrade" pricing, my
COR/ROR units?

I don't have to purchase the entire license?

-bob


----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
To: "'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:05 AM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent


> All,
>
> What Peter is referring too is getting an upgrade from the COR/ROR
> version of our software.  In the past, when we had a contract with
> Agere, we were prohibited from selling the upgrade.  We are no longer
> bound by that agreement.
>
> We have added several features to TurboCell since the last release of
> COR/ROR, so we have many requests for upgrades.
>
> His second point is that he wants to re-flash hardware to add 802.1x
> functionality.  That feature is in our next release (version 4.44) due
> out WEDNESDAY of this week. (of course, that assumes it makes it through
> test!)
>
> Kevin
>
> **************************************
> Kevin R. Knuth
> Business Development Manager
> North America
> 260-424-9690 Regional Office
> 614-822-5275 Corporate Office
> kknuth@karlnet.com
> www.karlnet.com
> **************************************
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of smyers
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:15 AM
> To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
>
>
> My apologies, but I seem to be missing something.  As of this writing, I
> have several "classic" pieces of hardware (serial 00-Ut, etc. indicates
> their manufacture was in 2000) running Karlnet's latest release, with
> apparently no issues.  Is this different than the upgrade you speak of?
>
>
> Kenneth "Scott" Myers
> Wireless Engineer
> smyers@telsouth.net
> (843) 842-7795 x 105
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Peter Dordik
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:53 AM
> To: Karlnet Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
>
> Kevin told us (several months ago), that upgrade from orinoco firmware
> (COR,
> ROR) to Karlnet Base and Satellite will be soon.
> I will be glad, if there will be upgrade for classic AP too (AP500,
> AP1000) with
> 802.1x support. Any plans?
>
> Peter
>
> > Good day to you.  I have experience in the equipment you mention and
> can
> > offer relation as way to help.
> >
> > I have a extremely similar network, with a piece of equipment running
> as
> > a "COR master" (commonly referred to as base in KarlNet lingo), and
> > multiple "slaves"  (referred to as satellites).  Most of the
> satellites
> > in the network are 4.15 lucent/Orinoco software, which KarlNet wrote,
> > and is the predecessor for the current KarlNet software.  I have had
> > both 4.15 base units 4.43 base units working with older satellites and
>
> > they seem to respond well to it, with a common latency of around 30ms,
>
> > and typical throughput of about 3-4 megs.
> >
> > Kenneth "Scott" Myers
> > Wireless Engineer
> > smyers@telsouth.net
> > (843) 842-7795 x 105
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Blair Drew Davis
> > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:32 PM
> > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > Subject: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
> >
> > Recently, with assistance from Ed at Karlnet, we found a work around
> for
> >
> > a for a latency and packet loss issue.
> >
> > We operate a geographically large wisp in Allegan, MI.  We use Lucent
> > hardware for our towers and backbones, and various suppliers for our
> > cpe.
> >
> > We have a mix of standard lucent software and Karlnet flashes.
> >
> > Using Karlnet Turbocell 4.43 as a COR in master mode to talk to a
> Lucent
> >
> > ROR 4.15 in slave mode we get high latency, limited bandwidth and high
>
> > packet loss.  Placing the COR into non-polling mode fixed this, but
> > limits this to a point to point link, not a point to multi point.
> >
> > Moving our equipment around has allowed us to have Lucent talking to
> > Lucent and Karlnet talking to Karlnet in most areas.
> >
> > However, my question is, will a Lucent ROR/COR in master mode talk to
> a
> > Karlnet ROR in slave mode without the latency, bandwidth, and packet
> > loss problems?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Blair Davis
> > Computer Adjusters of Allegan
> > www.computeradjusters.com
> > (616) 673-0054
> >
> > AOL Instant Message Screen Name       theory240
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>