Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Orion\]\s+1\.372\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Orion] 1.372 (score: 1)
Author: <wq7x@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:00:40 -0500
My Orion with 1.372 works great until receiver (DSP) is overdriven by strong signal- about S9 plus 30dB. There are many of those signals in the contest. And yes I have quiet location with "quiet ante
/archives//html/Orion/2005-11/msg00016.html (6,477 bytes)

2. Re: [Orion] 1.372 (score: 1)
Author: "Christoph Rheker" <christor@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:50:27 -0000
Yes, same here, happens usually on the Low Bands. But there you can add 6 or 12 dB of attenuation and won't loose anything... the noise level at nights is high anyway... 73 de Chris DL4YAO --Urspr&uu
/archives//html/Orion/2005-11/msg00020.html (7,763 bytes)

3. Re: [Orion] 1.372 (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:36:31 +0000
I work quite a bit of topband with my Orion and can't say that I experience this problem. Have you tried turning down the RF Gain control? 73, Barry N1EU _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Orion/2005-11/msg00021.html (6,823 bytes)

4. Re: [Orion] 1.372 (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Menzel" <retire@means.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:20:17 -0600
I concur with Barry, and I run my gain no higher than 90. I see absolutely no degradation of signal levels, and it helps keep atmospheric and other noise down, especially on the low bands. I used my
/archives//html/Orion/2005-11/msg00022.html (7,846 bytes)

5. Re: [Orion] 1.372 (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:17:57 -0500
I thought the selectivity was outstanding during the test. I was hearing weak sigs on 40M right next to S-9+ sigs. OTOH, the NR consistently raises the noise level. It's as if the RF gain is being in
/archives//html/Orion/2005-11/msg00023.html (8,453 bytes)

6. Re: [Orion] 1.372 (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Menzel" <retire@means.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:29:53 -0600
Why use the NR at all. Especially in a contest? Seems to me that that much DSP is detrimental to the overall performance in a tight packed band. Next time, try running it with the rf gain turned back
/archives//html/Orion/2005-11/msg00024.html (9,499 bytes)

7. Re: [Orion] 1.372 (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:10:53 -0600
For weak signals, ( and most other applications ) I am not using the Noise Reduction or Noise blanker at all, Seems like the automation always does something I don't want. All is manual controls of A
/archives//html/Orion/2005-11/msg00025.html (10,158 bytes)

8. Re: [Orion] 1.372 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:29:32 -0600
Somewhere, and I don't recall where, there is a writup on this or perhaps it was just an email from Scott on the tentec list. When NR is turned on, AGC THRESHOLD is reduced. That is what accounts for
/archives//html/Orion/2005-11/msg00026.html (7,773 bytes)

9. Re: [Orion] 1.372 (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:52:55 -0500
Thanks Tim, Grant, Rich and Larry. Well, when I engage the NR I can turn the RF gain down to 1 and still things sound noisy. I typically run my RF gain (w/o NR) at 55 to 70 on 40M. AS Tim describes b
/archives//html/Orion/2005-11/msg00027.html (11,370 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu