Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dj2001x@comcast.net: 418 ]

Total 418 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:04:10 -0600
Hi David, Theft is a different situation. I say that potential radiators should be tested, like they test amplifiers before they are released for sale. None of that's done, no oversight. We have LED
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00041.html (13,730 bytes)

182. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:21:36 -0600
I'm sorry David, but I don't agree with you. Dale, k9vuj _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00045.html (16,429 bytes)

183. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:25:39 -0600
Hi Roger, Now that statement I'll agree with. I will too. Even if I were to call the FCC to complain would I talk to a live human who knows what I'm talking about or would it be a robot that directs
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00046.html (9,249 bytes)

184. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:08:10 -0600
Shucks, that's another point, you got to be a Philadelphia lawyer to find and understand all that government gobbly gook. I'm not even sure where or if there is a field office in my city or near by.
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00051.html (11,437 bytes)

185. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:13:34 -0600
David, I think you also live in the country. Must be nice to have a quiet place without plasma tv's and dimmers etc. I will say, the power company here has been very helpful in finding sparking wirin
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00052.html (18,631 bytes)

186. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:51:52 -0600
David, it still puts the burden of finding, contacting the owner and trying to get him/her to fix or get rid of the offending device, which in my opinion should have never been on the shelves in the
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00057.html (13,735 bytes)

187. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:12:53 -0600
Exactly Ed, you said it better than I in para 1. Para 2 says what I've been trying to do, but it's a delicate thing and I'm not going into a neighborhood food fight, it's important to me, but not to
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00062.html (16,437 bytes)

188. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:36:58 -0600
Yes, Ed pretty well summed it up. Paul made some interesting comments too. To all, thankyou for this discussion it was enlightening for me. The old saying goes, squeaky wheels get the grease. Keep it
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00078.html (9,917 bytes)

189. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:33:10 -0600
Yeah, the only problem I see with that, contacting the FCC, is it pits me against my neighbor and I don't like that, nor should it be that way. The end user should not get the blame. The mfg of the c
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00082.html (15,392 bytes)

190. Re: [RFI] LEDs etc (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 12:15:24 -0600
And/or explain why and how if needed. Perhaps a workshop on RFI. The ARRL lab guys are pretty knowledgable. It should be pointed out too that bad RFI means in some situations interference with TV's a
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00102.html (9,441 bytes)

191. Re: [RFI] Fraudulent FCC RFI Certification (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:05:46 -0600
Thanks for posting that Don. I think it would help a lot if a few of these fraudsters were caught and hit good and hard in the pocket book, the word would get out. I'm glad to see that the FCC is fol
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00105.html (10,515 bytes)

192. Re: [RFI] Fraudulent FCC RFI Certification (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:44:46 -0600
That was good, especially the last parts. Tnx, 73 Dale, k9vuj _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00107.html (9,223 bytes)

193. Re: [RFI] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:20:07 -0600
You made a right choice Ray. Avoid clicking on any link you don't know where it came from or from whom. I am skeptical like you. Dale, K9VUJ _______________________________________________ RFI mailin
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00135.html (7,036 bytes)

194. Re: [RFI] Noise... (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 02:55:59 -0500
You guys must all live in the boonies. If I had such a thingie on my car driving around residential areas the cops would pull me over for something. It would even be worse at night. They'd have the s
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00039.html (10,690 bytes)

195. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 03:32:31 -0500
But we aren't the policemen/women. That is why as taxpayer we hire that job out. The problem TV's should have never made it to store shelves. Ditto for junk dimmers, wall wort PS, grow lights etc, et
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00061.html (8,713 bytes)

196. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:53:35 -0500
I think you all are missing the point. The idea is to be proactive and stop the junk from ever hitting the shelves in the first place. True, it's too late for the junk that's already out there, If yo
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00066.html (8,746 bytes)

197. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:37:07 -0500
Well Kim, the short answer is, I'm not willing to go to war with my next door neighbor. Sure, I could complain to the FCC and may or may not get relief, but I'd still have to live next door to my nei
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00069.html (11,029 bytes)

198. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:55:10 -0500
David, it helps to have more than one ham station affected. Three against the neighbor lends some support to the problem and ultimate resolve, especially if your ham friend is 6 ft 5 in, 240 and a bo
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00075.html (14,513 bytes)

199. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:00:37 -0500
Ken, they have authority (or should have) over items that hit our shores. What the off shore mfg does with the product after it's been rejected is their problem. A few rejections I'm quite sure would
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00078.html (10,219 bytes)

200. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "Dale J." <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:25:31 -0500
Ken if you have 20 db over noise then it's got to be very close to your antenna. If it's power line noise you should hear it on 10 meters and to zero in get a air band receiver (its AM and vhf), zero
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00083.html (10,919 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu