Yes, Ed pretty well summed it up. Paul made some interesting comments too.
To all, thankyou for this discussion it was enlightening for me. The old
saying goes, squeaky wheels get the grease. Keep it up. If we remain quiet,
then nobody hears. Hopefully the message will at least be read, by someone,
somewhere.
73
Dale, k9vuj
On 12, Feb 2014, at 17:59, <n0tt1@juno.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:53:51 -0600 Ed Douglass <efdouglass37@gmail.com>
> writes:
>> David Robbins' argument is interesting but it takes the focus away,
>> it
>> seems to me, from what should be the primary point of our efforts.
>> The
>> point is that the FCC's job in the first instance is to regulate
>> the
>> manufacturers and importers of electronic equipment so that the
>> equipment
>> does not cause interference to licensed users of the radio spectrum.
>> If
>> such regulation had been enforced, then we amateurs would not need
>> to be
>> approaching our neighbors about their RFI-generating appliances.
>>
>> For the RFI-generating equipment already in the country, then we
>> will have
>> to approach our neighbors and hope we have the FCC's backing if our
>> efforts
>> fail.
>>
>> For the long haul, however, we need to use ourselves and our ARRL to
>> get
>> the FCC to enforce its rules (and tighten them, where necessary).
>>
>> 73 de Ed, AA9OZ
>>
>
>
> Yes!! That would be the thing to do. What's the best approach
> to get the FCC back on track?
>
> I would like to think the ARRL would help with that by
> making a concerted effort to get it done. And the
> ARRL will need a lot of support (including money) from us!!
>
> 73,
> Charlie, N0TT
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|