Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant@alltel.net: 641 ]

Total 641 documents matching your query.

261. Re: [TenTec] Where do the filters go (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:44:41 -0400
Thanks Carl. W4BQF find the the My 600hz reason it's Tec how can BW it truly possible for and The 30 a _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00626.html (17,673 bytes)

262. Re: [TenTec] Inrad 762 (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:15:56 -0400
Tody, I concur with Bill's writting's. I didn't have the 1.8kc filter in my Orion, so I moved the 1kc filter into the 1.8kc slot, put the 600hz filter into the 1kc slot, and left the 500hz and 250hz
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00629.html (10,722 bytes)

263. Re: [TenTec] Re: headphones/orion (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:22:27 -0400
Two votes for the Sony's. However mine is model MDR-V900. Love 'em. But you can hear audio hiss from the Orion. N4PY, however, just clued me in on how to stop the hiss, using the AGC threshold. Tom-W
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00630.html (8,315 bytes)

264. Re: [TenTec] Inrad 762 (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:05:30 -0400
Nope. The cover is not much of an issue. Inrad encloses their filters, thus they are a little higher. The filters are in the top section of the Orion, thus have very little risk of wiggling loose. Th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00633.html (14,750 bytes)

265. Re: [TenTec] Inrad 762 (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:12:10 -0400
Sorry, I didn't read all you had said Toby. The 600Hz filter will give you advertise IMD performance at it's stated bandwidth, but not down to 100hz.. That was what the 500hz and 250 hz filters were
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00635.html (14,031 bytes)

266. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Support (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:46:11 -0400
Just can't beat these folks!! Last November I received a Titan 3, which was DOA. (turned out to be an easily made assembly error) After John and Paul couldn't reproduce the problem I saw on my desk,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00638.html (10,367 bytes)

267. Re: [TenTec] Re: headphones/orion (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:50:15 -0400
Ken, Bill sent this to me direct. I don't have his permission to publically post it, so hope he just won't throw rocks at me for doing it! "http://www.geocities.com/va3ttn/UsingOrionRX.pdf I had alre
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00639.html (7,896 bytes)

268. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 20, Issue 59 (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:35:34 -0400
No Eric. There's really no need to talk to anyone about it. The Inrad filters are almost always shielded, so it's no surprise. If I were to modify the filter cover, I would simply cut off the portion
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00658.html (9,698 bytes)

269. Re: [TenTec] Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:38:59 -0400
I'm with you John! This morning about 2 am, I took my Orion off the desk and replaced it with my Omni 6....I don't think the Orion has much of a chance of getting it's spot back. Conditions and activ
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00659.html (7,576 bytes)

270. Re: [TenTec] Ringing in Filters at High Speed CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:13:08 -0400
Morning Al, Hmmmm...ringing? Don't think I've ever noticed that in my (previous) IC-781, Corsair 2, or Omni 6. Course, my hearing is probably not the best for high frequency audio range. Most of the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00678.html (17,211 bytes)

271. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:32:14 -0400
It's all a personal choice....after all, we do call this a hobby! Exception is contest, wherein I doubt seriously you will hear anyone NOT using QSK. Tom - W4BQF PS....What is this VOX thing? Is this
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00679.html (9,074 bytes)

272. Re: [TenTec] Orion with Kam+ (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:06:49 -0400
Assuming your audio is being inputted to the rear AUX I/O connector, I would think your KAM has a problem. With my PC sound card, I set the sound level at barely minimum and the AUX input around 30,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00699.html (8,217 bytes)

273. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:59:49 -0400
YES!! Because they do just like he says. They can not tell they are transmitting (calling) while the DX is answering someone else, etc., etc., etc. Tom - W4BQF antenna, In of that had all ___________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00716.html (13,348 bytes)

274. [TenTec] DSP and such (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:31:26 -0400
I think most of us recognize W8JI for his practical and technical experience. In World Radio, here is what W8JI has to say: "Many of us think modern radios with advanced multiple DSP systems and LCD
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00739.html (7,393 bytes)

275. Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:02:34 -0400
I don't have an issue with the QSK switching, one can work around that. What I have an issue with is that most radios I have operated, that employ digital techniques, do not send CW correctly at spee
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00753.html (9,091 bytes)

276. Re: [spam] [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:54:32 -0400
to And the lesson is???? Once I found a source of used mil-spec vacuum relays, the first one I put in is still in the 425, three years of every contest I could stick my nose into, plus almost daily
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00773.html (9,087 bytes)

277. Re: [spam] [TenTec] Orion - second week impressions and comparisons (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:58:57 -0400
Now here is a ham for whom the Orion is a perfect match. To he** with Ten Tec's reputation of building the best CW radio available. What's a good reputation anyway? Tom - W4BQF since Sub head on 40m,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00774.html (11,465 bytes)

278. Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:00:06 -0400
Yes! Tom - W4BQF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00775.html (7,988 bytes)

279. Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:07:05 -0400
Since you are a very astute ham Bob, I will just assume you did that while listening to your Orion on a different receiver. The Orion's sidetone works OK at 70 wpm, but the two Orions I have certainl
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00777.html (12,609 bytes)

280. Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:26:11 -0400
Opps...one step too far here Jim! Money has little to do with it, other than allowing one to purchase what is necessary to have a VERY competative station. What's the beef about RST? Who cares that a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00780.html (13,217 bytes)

Current List: 261 - 280
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu