I want to sincerely thank everyone that has chimed in on this, both on and off list. A bit more background: I have no antennas nearby the rig. My 15 m antenna is up about 60 ft and is about 80 ft tot
as an aside, I found that my O II was off by 30 Hz (low -- I think). I took the cover off and adjusted it as best I could using WWV at 15 MHz and the "match tones between USB and LSB" method. Now I'm
Being one of the CW cranks, I almost never use SSB. But, I wanted to show the radio to some visiting kids and so fired up in SSB. I turned on the AN and found that the resulting audio was distorted,
I, too, would be interested in this. I reiterate Ron Castro's comments. Also, I would need to know just how "plug in" this mod would be. 73, Kim Elmore N5OP At 01:27 PM 12/31/2009, you wrote: I would
I almost never use 'fone, being a CW type, so I didn;t find any of the SSB related bugs. I use FSK more that SSB, and noticed tonight that the RFAGC in FSK doesn't act like the RF AGC in any other mo
Concerning RF AGC behavior in FSK mode: I just performed the "battery fail" master reset to insure that I had a clean slate and I still see the atypical behavior of the S-meter with RF AGC in FSK mod
Thanks, Lin You're the second person to confirm this. I'm not a big RTTY guy -- I do it on occasion because it's novel. That and the cats like the sound (I used to have cats that used to really go nu
Now that I've seen a picture of this, I see it, too. However, this bug has characteristics of something I always saw in v2.039: I would sometimes see the spectrum sweep get "swept out" from right to
I've seen some mention of getting the bandscope info out of the O II for an alternate display, but I've been wondering: where does it come from? Is it essentially a third rx, of is it derived from so
I hail form NT days and old hardware, when it was advisable to keep applications and system files on different disks. So, all my applications are on a D: partition and all of my system files are on t
The update appears to work properly on my O II. Now, a question for the group: Explain to be the difference between the two different AGC approaches. Since they almost certainly won't yield tidentica
I found that the "AGC System Type" selection is under the "RX" menu, not the "Other" menu, as stated in the documentation. A small matter, but there it is. Kim Elmore, N5OP
So far, this is very nice. The NR (which I almost never used) seems more effective than I recall. I like it better under the RF AGC by quite a bit. Using it on CW under the AF AGC masks a lot of the
I also notice the anomaly when AF AGC is engaged. If the decay rate is set to less than 6 dB/s the AGC hangs for the prescribed period, but the decay rate acts as if it's essentially infinity. This r
I'm no TT apologist, but don't these companies have different business models? Aren't the Flex5000 and K3 more of an open-source sort of environment? Kim Elmore, N5OP Having just read the post regard
This is interesting. While the difference is purely esthetic, I'm used to a Kenwood TS-930S and I *think* it used the equivalent of LCW. But now I'll have to check. I like the audio note to tune as R
Now, I've never used an IC-7800, a Yaesu FT-9000 or any of the other high-end, high quality Japanese rigs. Maybe I'm really missing something by not having a high-speed sweep function. But, contrary
I have a dead O II, the victim of a lightning strike. TT found a logic board with blown ICs (litearlly), replaced the board and it seemed to work. However, upon burn-in on their test rack "numerous"
First offer in my mailbox got it (logged at 1806 CDT). Thanks for the interest! Kim Elmore, N5OP At 06:01 PM 7/6/2008, you wrote: I have a dead O II, the victim of a lightning strike. TT found a logi
Thanks for the interest, but it's been taken. 73, Kim N5OP will take it. Dennis Jones k6rcl On Jul 6, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Kim Elmore wrote: Dennis Jones k6rcl@cox.net __________________________________