Mail Archive Search: <+from:johnclif@ix.netcom.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:johnclif@ix.netcom.com: 127 ]

Total 127 documents matching your query.

61. RE: [TenTec] Eccentric display? (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 00:27:58 -0700; expensive than ANY As in radios, while looks may not be EVERYTHING they are what gets you to try the product out further. I would venture to say that if you dated someone who you generally liked but; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00891.html (9,917 bytes)
62. RE: [TenTec] Orion Frequency Accuracy (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 00:32:43 -0700; I use a similar technique with my Omni VI/Opt 1 with TXCO, but I use the waterfall display in MixW to ensure that USB and LSB are the same offset from the center freq. After letting the rig warm up f; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00892.html (7,735 bytes)
63. RE: [TenTec] FCC Letters for "Enhanced SSB" (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 22:22:13 -0700; I think that getting better sound out of 2.8 kHz or less is an admirable goal, and I understand that some hams have taken the time and effort to determine not only what frequency response will provid; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01109.html (9,391 bytes)
64. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI with option 1 versus IC-746 (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 22:28:38 -0700; The Omni VI/Option 1, which is effectively a VI+ without the extra 9 MHz filter slot, is a vast improvement over the 746 in receive quality. It is more comparable to the 756 Pro and Pro II. You will; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01110.html (8,760 bytes)
65. [TenTec] Old Modes never die... they just get soundcard support! (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:01:36 -0800; Interesting thread about preferability of FSK over AFSK for RTTY... but it leads to a question. One poster moaned that the old modes like CW and RTTY were dying. With the resurgence in popularity of; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00130.html (11,192 bytes)
66. RE: [TenTec] Re: 253 Tuner vs AT-1000 Tuner? (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 12:53:36 -0700; The new AT-1000 tuner was designed for 1 kw rather than the full gallon to keep costs down while appealing to the largest segment of the amp market (the under-$1k amp purchaser). There are a lot of 5; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00380.html (8,249 bytes)
67. RE: [TenTec] Summary of differences? (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 03:45:35 -0700; I think the Omni VI/Option 1 is the best bargain of the bunch. You get everything a VI+ has except a 2nd 9Mhz filter slot and TXCO, and you can replace the crystal oven with a TXCO thru Ten-Tec (or y; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00745.html (10,118 bytes)
68. RE: [TenTec] OmniVI Opt3 question (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 12:50:08 -0800; I have an Omni VI/Opt 1, and the frequency stability has benefited GREATLY from two modifications. The first mod is to replace the crystal oven with the TXCO. This is not a big deal to install, altho; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00610.html (13,160 bytes)
69. [TenTec] Jupiter as a SWL rig... (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 19:14:50 -0800; I'd like to invite comments on anyone who has (or has had) both a Jupiter and a good SW radio like the Drake R8. How would you owners compare the two for shortwave radio listening and also AM BCB lis; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00710.html (7,172 bytes)
70. RE: [TenTec] filters for digital modes and qrp (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:45:09 -0800; What radio are you using? With my Omni VI/Opt1 I use the 9 Mhz 500 Hz RTTY filter for PSK31 and find I get great results with it. I've written a macro in MixW that centers that signal in the filter p; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00534.html (10,114 bytes)
71. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI filter macros, etc. for MixW v2.0x (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 01:56:47 -0800; Sure... (to a request that I post some of my macros) Note that I got the idea from something posted by (I believe) George W5YR a while ago... I call this one 'Align'. It moves the selected signal to; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00720.html (10,302 bytes)
72. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI filter macros, etc. for MixW v2.0x (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:46:53 -0800; George had posted a similar macro for his 756 Pro, I just copied the idea and made it work for the Omni VI. For those of you who are running software that doesn't support the Ten-Tec Omni VI (like M; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00735.html (9,247 bytes)
73. RE: [TenTec] TenTec/Vibroplex (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:09:41 -0800; I have thought about buying one of the TT Special Edition paddles but have hesitated. I'm not too worry if the thing needs to be realigned after passing thru the tender ministrations of United Parcel; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg01001.html (13,364 bytes)
74. RE: [TenTec] Interface for Ten-Tec OMNI VI+ (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 14:38:47 -0800; It depends on your software, and it also depends on which data port (RS-232 or C-IV) you want to use. I recommend using the RS-232 port. Regardless of which port you use, even though there are comma; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00028.html (9,442 bytes)
75. RE: [TenTec] Orion vs. Jupiter Audio vs. DSP (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 00:43:45 -0800; 100db of audio differential on a signal that I want to be able to hear thru headphones should be quite enough... don't you think? CD quality sound can be obtained from 16 bits of data. I know we're; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00036.html (9,456 bytes)
76. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter/LDG AT-11MP Tuner (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 04:23:20 -0800; I have one of these tuners that I use with my Omni VI (transmitter is almost identical to Jupiter). It works FB for me, but I never tune at more than 25 watts even though the tuner is rated to 150 wa; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00148.html (10,681 bytes)
77. RE: [TenTec] QRO Creep (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:49:57 -0800; I have seen the same thing happen, to a lesser degree, on other radios. I'm sure it's part of the warming up... transistors are more efficient as they get hotter because internal resistance decreases; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00182.html (7,351 bytes)
78. [TenTec] Amp questions... (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:25:23 -0800; I am the proud owner of a new-to-me Ten-Tec Centaur amplifier... and of course I have no idea how to use it. I thought long and hard before buying an amp, but decided that since the sunspot cycle is; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00326.html (11,172 bytes)
79. RE: [TenTec] Amp questions... (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 01:29:57 -0800; Concerning why the Centaur was discontinued, several people emailed me to tell me that the reason was that Svetlana had discontinued their 811A tube and there was no equivalent that was as well-made; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00390.html (10,042 bytes)
80. RE: [TenTec] Ameritron QSK-5 switch (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:00:34 -0800; I had been considering getting an 811A-based amp (SB200, AL800, etc.) to help on the low bands as the solar cycle decreases... and just for the ability to work some DX that wouldn't come back to my 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00745.html (8,587 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]