Mail Archive Search: <+from:kh7m@hsa-kauai.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:kh7m@hsa-kauai.net: 88 ]

Total 88 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] new Ten Tec ( fill in the blank) (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 11:13:12 -1000; Don't know about today, but over the years have known many Jag owners. Unfortunately, the MTBF for those autos is just too short!! Was riding in a beautiful Jag sedan up to San Francisco, to a much; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-04/msg00227.html (9,112 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Decisions - Sell TT Gear (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:28:37 -1000; Hi all, Well, here I sit pondering what to do about four TT rigs I have picked up over the past three years or so, really just to compare performance among them. Well, they are all just great! But th; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-04/msg00258.html (10,188 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Decisions - Sell TT Gear (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 15:40:54 -1000; Hi again, And thanks to the many of you who have taken the time to reply. So far, the vote would be keep only the Corsair II. However, a couple of you also have all three rigs. Those two folks have s; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-04/msg00261.html (9,799 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Decisions - Sell TT Gear (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 16:54:59 -1000; Ok, some added responses: 1. The Corsair II is all anolugue; therefore, easier to work on then the Omni, should you be inclined to tinkering on your rigs. 2. The Corsair II seems to have a "smoother"; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-04/msg00262.html (8,768 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Decisions - Sell TT Gear (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:09:59 -1000; HI to all following this thread, In the VERY early morning hours of this Monday, this note came in from K4OWN: "Jim: Considering the delimma that you are faced with, my suggestion is to keep ALL the; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-04/msg00267.html (12,075 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Coorsair II "Quirk" (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 13:33:36 -1000; Hi, Listened to several SSB signals today; 15 M seems best of the upper bands mid-day. Worked JA1CG with very strong signals. Then went to 17 M to check prop there. Discovered that to demodulate SSB; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-04/msg00294.html (8,428 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Corsair II "Quirk" (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 15:54:20 -1000; Well, thank you for that, Bob, and all the others who have responded. I will presume that the original design was as we now have the entire Corsair series of radios. And the deliberate reason to avo; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-04/msg00302.html (9,078 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Semi-deaf Corsair II (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:07:04 -1000; Hi to all, Well, now am absolutely convinced my Corsair II is occasionally not hearing too well, particularly low level CW signals are NOT heard/copied that are just fine on both the Triton 544 and O; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-04/msg00316.html (10,055 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Semi-deaf Corsair II (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:17:00 -1000; Hi, Spell checker and I didn't agree. Correct word in the following sentence of the original message should be "re-soldering". 73, Jim, KH7M -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submis; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-04/msg00317.html (7,630 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Semi-deaf Corsair II (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:10:38 -1000; Thanks to all who have replied with suggestions for the indicated problem. So far, the simple check above seems to have helped loads! So, I won't go into the "freezing" of solder joints just yet. If; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-04/msg00329.html (7,912 bytes)
11. [TenTec] N4PY Using the TenTec RX331 with a Pegasus (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 10:41:38 -1000; But, Carl, there is no price/delivery info on the 331 rcvr, at least that I can find. The 340, with lots of buttons and knobs ( presumably the same rcvr?) is shown and priced at $3950, or some such.; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00043.html (7,367 bytes)
12. [TenTec] On Inrad filters (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:53:06 -1000; They are not. The Inrads for TT rigs are direct plug-in replacements. My Omni VI+ is full of Inrads, including the 2.8's in both positions. 73, Jim, KH7M -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00247.html (7,052 bytes)
13. [TenTec] On Inrad filters (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:55:38 -1000; Hi Alan, Gosh no, but I am using two Inrad 400 Hz for Cw. My filter line up is: 9 mHz IF strip: IRD 754, 2.8 kHz IRD 756, 2.4 kHz IRD 753, 400 Hz And on the pass band, 6 mHz board: IRD 755, 2.8 kHz; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00249.html (7,644 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Re: Triton IV audio (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:00:06 -1000; Hi Tim, you wrote, in part: Well, that is not usual. I have two Triton 544's here, and neither has that behavior! My CW audio is very comfortable at the 9 o'clock pot position. When using a speaker,; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00006.html (8,106 bytes)
15. [TenTec] CW tuning (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:58:09 -1000; My question concerns tuning a CW signal to an SSB QSO....... Here in Hawaii, we have had going since 1974 the Hawaii Afternoon Net, an SSB "chat" session held on 7088 kHz (out here SSB is permitted 7; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00341.html (8,230 bytes)
16. [TenTec] "A low vswr will kill you ! " (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:02:34 -1000; On link coupled, balanced tuners: Perhaps the "best" circuit is presented by L B Cebik in his discussion of link coupled antenna tuners at: http://www.cebik.com/link0.html This tutorial material is i; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00516.html (11,846 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Oops; Small typo in my link tuner post (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:36:08 -1000; Finger hit the 2, should be about 300 pF series C on 80 meters; varies throughout the band, of course. Note that Cebik suggests when building up a link coupled tuner from scratch, the secondary indu; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00517.html (10,259 bytes)
18. [TenTec] "A low vswr will kill you ! " (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 19:53:10 -1000; In H. Hertz's paper of 1889*, he did not require that the radiating element be "resonant". In fact, that idea did not then exist! *1. Hertz H., "On the relation between light and electricity" Gesamme; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00530.html (10,692 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Model 242 remote VFO (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:57:03 -1000; Hi Pete, Well, my 242 operates just fine via power from the companion 544. Of course I power my 544/242 with a "new" TT 962 power supply. Per the 544 diagram, fig. 3-4 in my 544 0wner's Manual, the; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00556.html (8,032 bytes)
20. [TenTec] "A low vswr will kill you ! " (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:36:57 -1000; Dr. Jerry wrote, in part: Now, if only Bruene had been able to state what Dr. Jerry has given us in the above so clearly....... Instead, Bruene set about to anyilate Walt Maxwell's work via charactye; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00564.html (11,833 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]