- 1. Re: [TenTec] TWINCOM feedline ????????????? (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 01:12:27 -0400
- Gremlins! 73 Bob, K4TAX Not a gremlin, but rather a virus called bugbear. It's not on your machine, Bob, but on the machine of someone who has communicated with you by e-mail. There are two tip-offs:
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00182.html (8,577 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Another grounding thought and personal observation (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:15:21 -0400
- Stainless steel shim material from McMaster-Carr is also a solution. 73, Pete N4ZR The World HF Contest Station Database was updated August 4. 123 stations were added or updated. Are you current? www
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00292.html (9,905 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Help! Please! (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 07:41:19 -0400
- Also, it seems that my virus software held your message because of a possible virus. Might be worth checking into. It was a legitimate post that came via the Ten-Tec reflector, but it was intended fo
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00296.html (7,589 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 16:00:59 -0400
- At 01:07 PM 7/11/03 -0500, you wrote: I tend to agree with you, (at least I think your implicit point) that cores on a coax length are an entirely adequate, economical and wide band solution to block
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00351.html (11,729 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] On the practical side (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 14:59:04 -0400
- At 10:18 AM 6/2/03 -0400, AC5E@aol.com wrote: enabling Ethernet on most of the peripherial equipment is going to cost big bucks, and a serious programming effort on the part of many very small ham eq
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00053.html (8,385 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] On the practical side (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 17:01:56 -0400
- Those are the guys -- it's odd that they don't list any of the Ethernet hardware items that they were showing at Dayton. maybe that was someone else sharing the booth. Thanks, Mike. 73, Pete N4ZR Th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00061.html (7,928 bytes)
- 7. [TenTec] Fwd: Ethernet shack controls (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 05:59:34 -0400
- Hi Peter, Bill, K6GNX, told me you were interested in ethernet based shack controls. We just added our new ethernet control widgets to our website. They are in final testing and production will be st
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00102.html (7,451 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] Re: Added weight (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 07:46:59 -0400
- At the risk of actually bringing the discussion back to TenTec <g>, I have an ancient TenTec KR-5 keyer that has a chunk of steel or lead attached to the inside of the cover to keep it from skating a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00241.html (9,367 bytes)
- 9. [TenTec] KR-5 TT emblem (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 13:14:07 -0400
- I'm restoring a KR-5 keyer that I've owned since it (and I) were pups. At one time I had a momentary contact pushbuttom switch installed where the little die-cast emblem mounted on the top frony. Now
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00305.html (6,917 bytes)
- 10. [TenTec] KR-5 TT emblem -- trying again (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 13:16:43 -0400
- I'm restoring a KR-5 keyer that I've owned since it (and I) were pups. At one time I had a momentary contact pushbutton switch installed in the hole where the little die-cast emblem mounted on the fr
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00306.html (7,045 bytes)
- 11. Re: [TenTec] Politically-correct amplification (was Bias)..VIRUS INATTACHMENT (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:05:05 -0400
- At 09:45 AM 6/10/03 -0500, holladayfd wrote: I got one too from the refklector. Frank, K4VMO -- Original Message -- From: "Stuart Satrun" <kw8k@yahoo.com> To: <TenTec@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, J
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00359.html (9,033 bytes)
- 12. RE: [TenTec] Programming bugs (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 10:20:01 -0400
- At 05:22 PM 6/14/03 -0700, Kevin J. Rowett wrote: Not quite. While perhaps not a programming bug, certainly a bug - the MARS lander that crashed - one group worked in SI, the other in english units,
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00485.html (9,656 bytes)
- 13. Re: [TenTec] Omni6+ roofing filter (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:07:18 -0400
- At 08:09 AM 6/16/03 -0700, you wrote: INRAD did some experiments with a narrower roofing filter in the OMNI VI and the improvements were not large. The OMNI VI has such a solid front end that the roo
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00506.html (9,360 bytes)
- 14. Re: [TenTec] Omni6+ roofing filter (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:37:52 -0400
- Fair enough -- so it's a mystery why a narrow roofing filter *wouldn't* help, isn't it? A 1-kHz filter there should result in a usefully better close-in IMD figure, I'd think... 73, Pete N4ZR The Wo
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00510.html (8,782 bytes)
- 15. Re: [TenTec] Omni6+ roofing filter (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:37:16 -0400
- Fascinating -- I learn something new every day. I wonder why the Omni's IMD performance isn't even better, then? According to Inrad's table of available filters, there are only two IFs where filters
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00523.html (8,482 bytes)
- 16. Re: [TenTec] Virus Warning (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:25:57 -0400
- More likely it has infected the machine of a member of the list, and gotten only the addresses of people who have posted to the list. 73, Pete N4ZR The World HF Contest Station Database was updated 1
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00562.html (7,952 bytes)
- 17. [TenTec] A/B Testing Flame Wars (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 07:36:35 -0400
- I've been sitting here reading this back-and-forth, even though I've never owned a Ten-Tec radio. Seems like the discussion is getting into diminishing returns now. One thing fascinates me, though. E
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00762.html (8,593 bytes)
- 18. Re: [TenTec] Hello Orion Users (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 21:34:01 -0400
- The DSP operates ahead of the audio stage, and thus can be called IF. Of course, the frequency of 14 khz is certainly in the audio range. And no - we could never afford DSP done at high RF frequencie
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00106.html (10,034 bytes)
- 19. [TenTec] Orion headphone jack (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 16:55:06 -0400
- I downloaded the manual for the Orion today, and one of the first things that struck my eye was a stern warning that plugging a mono phone jack into the headphone jack will damage the audio amplifier
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00199.html (7,435 bytes)
- 20. Re: [TenTec] Orion headphone jack (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 17:26:15 -0400
- At 04:19 PM 5/8/03 -0500, you wrote: I have plugged a set of mono phones into that jack on a couple of occasions accidentally. The world did not come to an end. The radio did not blow up or smoke. In
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00204.html (7,966 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu