Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa3fiy@radioadv.com: 320 ]

Total 320 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [TenTec] 80 m. American Novice Band allocation (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 08:48:45 -0800
Interesting.... What part of the country are you in Rob? Around here (Western Pennsylvania) there is lot's of activity there in the evenings. A lot of traffic nets, a slow speed net or two and plenty
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00584.html (7,618 bytes)

182. Re: [TenTec] Orion and PSK - overdriving computer (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:08:23 -0500
Sounds like you might have the Orion line out connected to the Soundcard MIC input. If that is the case, you would indeed overdive the soundcard. Connect to soundcard line input if it is not already
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00620.html (8,278 bytes)

183. RE: [TenTec] No ALC cable to AMP? (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:09:43 -0500
IF what is said below is true, then none of the named amplifiers is safe to use with any transciever! Just imagine what might happen if the ALC cable became disconnected. Possible amplifier destructi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01286.html (8,870 bytes)

184. Re: [TenTec] Orions & contesting (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:28:24 -0500
I guess I don't understand the apparent confusion here. Every one of the above matters is done by connecting the PTT output from the computer in parallel with the Amplifier control line of the Orion
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01287.html (10,041 bytes)

185. Re: [TenTec] Re: ORION headphone clicks - the fix! (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:52:18 -0500
There's been a lot of discussion about the "click" when running QSK CW. Not surprising, as the receiver AGC is reset during the transmission of each element. When switching from transmit to receive,
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01289.html (9,038 bytes)

186. Re: [TenTec] Another reason for PTT CW (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:12:08 -0500
Yes I certainly do, that's why I back off the RF Gain most of the time. Have you tried that? If not, you might be pleasantly surprised at the result. No loss of signals, lots of loss of noise. :-) -7
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01294.html (8,477 bytes)

187. Re: [TenTec] Argo V #516 vs. Omni 6+ #564 RX performance (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:25:50 -0500
Hello Mike, I have both rigs and here are my observations. DSP: Argonaut 516 - Does not have automatic notch filter, or any notch filter for that matter. That I miss. The noise reduction works well.
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01295.html (8,609 bytes)

188. Re: [TenTec] How We Buy Things (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:16:27 -0500
There are disadvantages to using PTT as you describe. I posted an example yesterday, but repeat it here. On the other had, it is quite simple to accomplish the "PTT" controlled function by connecting
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01355.html (8,745 bytes)

189. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ question (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 11:40:44 -0400
I think the intercept point is independent of the signal spacing, at least up to the bandwidth of the filter between the antenna and first active devices or mixer. Dynamic range is definitely a funct
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00041.html (8,940 bytes)

190. Re: [TenTec] New group for Orion (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 19:05:43 -0400
Oh no! Here we go again! I sure hope you Orion owners stay here. It has been good to see the Orion postings along with other Ten Tec happenings all in one place. -Lee
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00097.html (9,898 bytes)

191. Re: [TenTec] Orion SSB Challenge: why no Orions heard? (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 21:05:17 -0400
Not quite! If an Orion (or any other Ten Tec ham radio product) owner is unhappy with his or her purchase they can get their "bucks" back within 30 days!!! They don't have to defend anything. -Lee
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00450.html (10,181 bytes)

192. Re: [TenTec] 238 A Tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:54:30 -0400
My 238 matches my Omni VI perfectly. Also matches the Corsair II, Paragon and Omni V. It is an early version, I don't think it is an "A". I've never had the dial string break. The rubberband that ret
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00395.html (7,999 bytes)

193. Re: [TenTec] Argo V Distortion (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 20:37:24 -0400
I ran into a similar problem setting my Argonaut up for SSB. Seems the MIC level setting was very touchy and had to be set somewhere around eight o'clock or so. A little more....and distortion, a lit
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00200.html (9,894 bytes)

194. Re: [TenTec] Product Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:57:36 -0400
I'm not so sure it is "unfortunate" that the Orion is forced into this competition. And it surely was not "forced". Ten Tec released it for shipping when they were ready to do so. From that point on,
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00241.html (11,218 bytes)

195. [TenTec] Field Day experiences (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:57:36 -0400
It's been interesting, reading the threads on Field Day. Because of health reasons I have not actively participated in Field Day the last few years, but can vividly recall various experiences over th
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00242.html (7,444 bytes)

196. Re: [TenTec] VE3JC's Power Mite Web Page (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 14:43:29 -0400
The site worked fine here a few hours ago. Yes, nice pictures indeed. 73 de Lee, WA3FIY 73 de Lee, WA3FIY wa3fiy@radioadv.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00244.html (8,288 bytes)

197. Re: [TenTec] Black machine screws for model 243 VFO or Omni D series needed (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 16:44:36 -0400
Have you tried Ten Tec Service Dept.? 73 de Lee, WA3FIY 73 de Lee, WA3FIY wa3fiy@radioadv.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00335.html (9,494 bytes)

198. Re: [TenTec] Hiss and click on Orion sidetone (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 21:19:51 -0400
You can often solve a lot of extraneous noise in the headphones problems with the addition of a series resistor in the headphone circuit. On my Omni VI, I use a 1K resistor in series with my 200 ohm
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00784.html (10,044 bytes)

199. Re: [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 15:41:48 -0400
Very strange to me too Cliff....?????? 73 de Lee, WA3FIY 73 de Lee, WA3FIY wa3fiy@radioadv.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00398.html (8,888 bytes)

200. Re: [TenTec] Orion Relfector (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 17:11:05 -0400
I agree Bill...................... 73 de Lee, WA3FIY -- 73 de Lee, WA3FIY wa3fiy@radioadv.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00933.html (8,826 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu