Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa3fiy@radioadv.com: 320 ]

Total 320 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TenTec] Beverage on Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 13:52:49 -0500
One very easy way to do it is to key a small high speed SPDT relay with the "QSK" signal of the Jupiter. The realy common terminl goes to the Jupiter, the NC terminal to the Beverage and the NO termi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00005.html (8,409 bytes)

202. Re: [TenTec] LDG PT-11P Tuner? (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 14:00:08 -0500
Jeff, I use the PT-11P with good results here. My antenna is a 256 foot off center fed dipole with a 4:1 balun at the feed point. It gives me all band coverage from 160 through 10 meters. On most ban
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00006.html (8,082 bytes)

203. Re: [TenTec] Orion (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 22:15:09 -0500
When you recover your speaking ability .........tell those of us ORION wannabe's what we are missing. Please! :-) 73 de Lee, WA3FIY
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00058.html (7,771 bytes)

204. Re: [TenTec] Fw: Orion (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 22:16:37 -0500
Roger......Roger......Roger......... Relax! Ten Tec did just fine with the Orion. I don't know about the FSK as I don't have an Orion here......YET! But I do know about the QSK and I think you are a
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00091.html (14,422 bytes)

205. Re: [TenTec] Century 22 (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 14:52:04 -0500
Check out the CodeBoy PUP keyer at: http://www.radioadv.com/ham_radio_equipment/Accessories/BK176a177.htm Fits nicely and works well too. It's a variation on the stand alone CodeBoy keyer. Uses power
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00133.html (7,715 bytes)

206. Re: [TenTec] Radio for soon to be newbie General.... (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 16:34:34 -0500
I haven't seen any responses to your question Gene. Maybe folks responded directly. Anyway, my opinion of the Pegasus is that it is a very good value and a lot of fun! Combined with the N4PY control
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00152.html (8,063 bytes)

207. Re:[TenTec]Radio for soon to be newbie General (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 12:57:44 -0400
Check out: http://www.radioadv.com/ham_radio_equipment/FreqMC/A2.htm It works with most of the Ten Tec analog readout rigs including the Century's 21 and 22 and even keeps your setup almost pure Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00210.html (7,511 bytes)

208. Re: [TenTec] Is the Orion Performance Table COorrect? (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:04:26 -0400
James, The numbers you quoted for the K2 are for 20Khz spacing. The numbers Ten Tec quoted are for 5 Khz spacing. As you can see, the Orion has close in performance that is unmatched by a long shot b
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00449.html (9,874 bytes)

209. (Fwd) Re: [TenTec] Corsair versus Paragon? (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:03:50 -0400
As I recall, that problem was quickly fixed. On the other hand, as the I recall, the Paragon turned in the best two tone dynamic range the ARRL had reported up to the time of the review, and since th
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00468.html (8,767 bytes)

210. Re: (Fwd) Re: [TenTec] Corsair versus Paragon? (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 19:27:44 -0400
Hmmm.........? Maybe it was only "well known" by me. :-) I have three Paragons and I had the failure in two of them. I also know of several other Paragons that had the same failure. I don't know the
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00478.html (8,808 bytes)

211. Re: (Fwd) Re: [TenTec] Corsair versus Paragon? (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:33:00 -0400
I don't know about any of the others but the failures I had here were clearly not cold solder joints. I examined the boards under a microscope and saw fractured solder joints. Both the PC board and c
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00631.html (8,760 bytes)

212. Re: [TenTec] Group replies vs. personal e-mail (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:01:41 -0500
Mark, When I hit "Reply" I get the following options: All I have to do is check a box beside each of the fields I want for my reply message. Very easy. From the looks of this, it is clear that the re
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00190.html (15,821 bytes)

213. Re: [TenTec] New ham looking at Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:20:56 -0500
snip OK Jody, since you want to go new, but you're still not quite sure which way to go, I will strongly recommend the Pegasus as your first purchase. Ten Tec has a 30 day return policy, no question
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00228.html (10,127 bytes)

214. Re: [TenTec] New ham looking at Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 10:28:30 -0500
I forgot to mention that if you decide to give the Pegasus a try, by all means get the N4PY software. I don't know if Carl has a demo version or not. You can check with him at: www.ralabs.com/n4py -o
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00231.html (10,310 bytes)

215. [TenTec] Corsair II Audio (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 19:15:44 -0500
Last week I was getting ready to do some work on my Corsair II to minimize the AGC 'POP' [ more on that later ] but I also have been noticing lately that the audio did not seem to be up to it's norma
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00265.html (8,933 bytes)

216. [TenTec] Are we going backward? (was RE: ARRL Lab Test Equipment etc) (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 20:22:31 -0500
Welcome to the Ten Tec group Ed. I appreciate the time you have taken to help us understand the effort the League goes to to get solid performance data on our gear. I knew it was a daunting task but
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00266.html (12,351 bytes)

217. Re: [TenTec] CW Contests and IP3 (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 10:37:15 -0500
I did not read into John's comments that the 516 is an over achiever. In fact he mentioned I think he was just sharing his observation of it's performance under contest conditions against another rad
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00278.html (9,622 bytes)

218. Re: [TenTec] Some Argo 515 questions (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 08:55:30 -0500
Nice little rig! Yours likely needs alignment. As I write this I am listening to some CW on 40, and the signal is present only on one side of zero beat. Likewise on 20, but you will notice that as yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00393.html (9,791 bytes)

219. Re: [TenTec] 238A rotary switch knobs (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:29:10 -0500
I've not had any problems with my 238 tuner knobs but I have had that problem with bandswitch knobs on various transceivers. So................when I get a new piece of Ten Tec stuff, I immediately r
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00415.html (10,413 bytes)

220. Re: [TenTec] Astatic D104 mic and Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:30:48 -0500
Yep, the D-104 looks like a real mic! :-) I use one here along with a DM-50 and a home brew mic on my Ten Tecs with good success. In the case of the D-104, you will need to use the preamp in the stan
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00500.html (8,209 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu