Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Why\s+is\s+the\s+Jupiter\s+better\?\s*$/: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Scott" <w4zy@bobandpenny.us>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:13:15 -0400
I can get an Icom IC-746 Pro for $1300 including power supply and microphone. It looks like it has the same features as the Jupiter plus I get 6M and 2M. A Jupiter will cost me almost $1700 if I get
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00119.html (8,674 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Scott" <w4zy@bobandpenny.us>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:13:28 -0400
I can get an Icom IC-746 Pro for $1300 including power supply and microphone. It looks like it has the same features as the Jupiter plus I get 6M and 2M. A Jupiter will cost me almost $1700 if I get
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00120.html (8,693 bytes)

3. RE: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:19:21 -0700
Bob, Does the price you quoted for an IC-746 Pro also include a built-in tuner? 73 Rick I can get an Icom IC-746 Pro for $1300 including power supply and microphone. It looks like it has the same fea
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00121.html (9,251 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown, K9MI" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:31:56 +0000
NJ0IP wrote: Bob, Does the price you quoted for an IC-746 Pro also include a built-in tuner? Yes Rick it does. As far as I know, all the Icom 746/756 series radios include a built in auto tuner. What
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00123.html (10,591 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Scott" <w4zy@bobandpenny.us>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:52:37 -0400
Yes. 73, Bob -- Original Message -- From: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 5:19 PM Subject: RE: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? in ______________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00125.html (9,861 bytes)

6. RE: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:54:02 -0400
The only thing Ten Tec buys you when comparing the 2 radios is service. I can get an Icom IC-746 Pro for $1300 including power supply and microphone. It looks like it has the same features as the Jup
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00128.html (9,275 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown, K9MI" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:15:23 +0000
John L Merrill wrote: The only thing Ten Tec buys you when comparing the 2 radios is service. Plus, 30 day trial. Send it back if you don't like it. A transmitter that probably won't fail. I'd say it
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00129.html (10,743 bytes)

8. RE: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:19:34 -0700
Sorry John, we can't leave that one go.... Try running high-speed break-in CW with the IC-746 and compare it to the Jupiter. You'll throw rocks at the 746! Try to attach a linear to the 746 and then
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00130.html (11,603 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:27:46 -0500
I don'tknow aobut the jupiter but the receiver in my omni6+ has a way better s/n radio because of a superior dsp than the 746 does. I can hear weak signals far better on the onmi6+ and the noise leve
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00131.html (12,519 bytes)

10. RE: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Michel" <w9op@athenet.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:42:39 -0000
The Omni VI+ is my vote also. Mark, W9OP Bob, in fact that is another option to choose from ... Get a used Omni6+ from TenTec! Carsten --Urspr&uuml;ngliche Nachricht-- Von: Jim Miller WB5OXQ [mailto:
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00133.html (13,119 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe" <n9vx@myway.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 10:58:27 -0400 (EDT)
I have owned both the Jupiter and the IC-746PRO and would pick the Jupiter. My mode of operation is ssb rag chew, so can not address cw, contesting, digital modes and etc. The 746PRO does have digita
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00134.html (8,686 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:56:52 -0500
I don't think the Jupiter has internal thermal issues as it appears the 746 does. Check out the eHam reviews here: http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1951 And in the remote chance that there is a pro
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00135.html (8,763 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe" <n9vx@myway.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 11:18:18 -0400 (EDT)
I have owned both the Jupiter and the IC-746PRO and would pick the Jupiter. My mode of operation is ssb rag chew, so can not address cw, contesting, digital modes and etc. The 746PRO does have digita
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00136.html (8,683 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:28:00 -0700
.....is like asking where would you like to live, Miami or Seattle? There are plenty of clear differences, yet, similar enough to consider both. The auto antenna tuner choice is like owning an umbrel
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00138.html (9,887 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis, NC2F" <nc2f@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:31:47 -0400
I suppose its resale value will drop substantially the day you unpack it.>> -- I wasn't aware that iCom announced a 746ProII. Is that a non-U.S. market only for the time being? I haven't seen any adv
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00139.html (9,665 bytes)

16. RE: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 17:59:08 -0700
Dennis and others, I appologize - my grey cells mixed things up (once again). [To my knowledge] There is not yet a 746 PRO II on the market. I confused it up with the 756. Sorry if I caused a few hea
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00140.html (10,705 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: ac5e@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:36:29 +0000
The only time I have had a chance to give my Jupiter a wring out in a rig shootout it was. Conditions were very noisy, with thunderstorms all around, solar noise was high, but the Jupiter was still p
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00142.html (7,549 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis, NC2F" <nc2f@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:44:52 -0400
Not a problem Rick. It did pique my interest when you mentioned it. 73, Dennis NC2F stigma (Jupiter apples. . _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00143.html (11,572 bytes)

19. RE: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 10:23:55 -0700
Hi Carsten, Correction: You do not need to add filters to an IC-746Pro. You cannot, in fact - like the Jupiter, it is a DSP-based radio. The 746Pro covers HF, 6m and 2m. The IC-746Pro is also fitted
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00144.html (9,382 bytes)

20. RE: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 11:43:23 -0700
Well, the built-in tuner from Icom is nowhere near as capable as the LDG-supplied autotuner in the Jupiter. The Icom's tuner (I believe) only matches a 3:1 or better SWR, while the LDG will do 10:1.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00146.html (10,568 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu