Mail Archive Search: <slopers>

Results:

References: [ slopers: 220 ]

Total 220 documents matching your query.

161. Topband: Conditions for the CQWW 160 CW 1/2 wave versus 1/4 wave (score: 2): Author: "Jose M. Valdes R. YV5LIX" <yv5lix@cantv.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:46:51 -0000; Hello everyone, Conditions were very good this weekend, I never did the calling since I just wanted to test de two antennas, but I was able to work 14 countries and 14 US states running only 100 watt; /archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00337.html (10,690 bytes)
162. Topband: N2XE Beacon Blow-out Summary! Here Comes 250uW (score: 2): Author: John C Ceccherelli <cecchere@us.ibm.com>(by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:59:07 -0500; Last night's code word was "EDEN" If you got it off the web instead of off the air, you have my pity. Next run starts at 1700Z Christmas day--250uW on 3545.5 KHz--until 1400Z Dec 26. Wow! Great respo; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00298.html (11,836 bytes)
163. Re: Topband: sloper antennas (score: 2): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 05:53:38 -0500; intended to mitigate this be in similar It may not mitigate as much as we hope for, although certainly any improvement can be helpful. It may actually not help anything at all, or even make things w; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00095.html (8,549 bytes)
164. RE: Topband: sloper antennas (score: 2): Author: Robert Marshall-Read <rmread@starhub.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:32:39 +0800; My experience with slopers in 9V has been good. The first model (MK1) was about 100 feet long fed against the copper pipe water system of the apartment building and a few indoor radials. It took abou; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00090.html (8,146 bytes)
165. Re: Topband: sloper puzzler (score: 2): Author: Earl W Cunningham <k6se@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 13:28:37 -0800; A bit from my own on-the-air experience with slopers: When I returned to the air in 1996 after a long hiatus (I QRT'd in 1984 after achieving 160m DXCC), I needed an antenna for 80m to go after 5BDXC; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00082.html (9,283 bytes)
166. Topband: ARRL contest (score: 2): Author: "theo" <theo.bemelmans@pandora.be>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 20:00:37 +0100; Hi all, After a the big cw weekend CQWW CW (single op 40 m) planned to take it easy in the ARRL contest. Worked about 40 USA and find there were overall good listeners. Ofcourse i do agree with you M; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00078.html (6,598 bytes)
167. Topband: sloper puzzler (score: 2): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 08:55:41 -0500; 18m with TH6DXX and above it is 2 meters tube with A3WS on the top. Be careful with conclusions. There are multiple issues at work simultaneously. 1. Nobody knows for sure the patterns for slopers...; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00071.html (9,400 bytes)
168. Topband: sloper interaction (score: 2): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 10:08:59 -0500; Dave, You can't have both slopers up at the same time, that close together, without interaction. Pull the 9INN back alongside the tower, and coil it up at the bottom, and try the experiment again. Se; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00055.html (7,818 bytes)
169. Re: Topband: Shunt feeding the rotating tower (score: 2): Author: Peter Sears <w5ps@airmail.net>; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:39:05 -0500; Juhani, I have a 130' rotating tower with essentially the same setup. I have 2 element 40M at 130', 4 element 20M at 121', guy bearing at 120', guy bearing at 90'. another 4 element 20M at 61' and ro; /archives//html/Topband/2004-10/msg00048.html (8,280 bytes)
170. Topband: Shunt feeding the rotating tower (score: 2): Author: "Juhani Viitala" <viitala.juhani@kolumbus.fi>; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:36:23 +0300; Hi! I am planing to shunt feed my rotating tower. There are four yagis on it 5el 15m up 130', 5el 20m up 120', 4el 17m up 110' and 5 el 10m up 100' the first guy wire bearing ring is up 92' and the s; /archives//html/Topband/2004-10/msg00042.html (6,711 bytes)
171. Re: Topband: Re: 160m Ant on 80m? (score: 2): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:54:30 -0400; loading coli will most likely act like a trap thus you will most likely not have an 1/2 wave electrical antenna. Actually a loading coil almost always acts like an inductive reactance termination on; /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00119.html (9,112 bytes)
172. RE: Topband: K8UR array (score: 2): Author: "Iowaguy" <earlham@radiks.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:04:27 -0600; I have an 80 mtr K8UR array hung from the 120' guy ring on the rotating tower. I do use current baluns on my array. They do present some extra weight but not so excessive as to cause major problems.; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00103.html (9,296 bytes)
173. RE: Topband: K8UR array (score: 2): Author: "James Wolf" <kr9u@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:29:01 -0500; Tim, W9LT experimented with this (parasitic) design back in the 70's. Whether or not he was working from his own idea, I don't know. I believe it was published as I still remember the pictures with h; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00038.html (10,944 bytes)
174. Re: Topband: K8UR array (score: 2): Author: Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:44:06 -0600; Hello Ron: You might want to take a look a my QST article about the Lazy "V" array that I used and was published in the early 90's. I installed the K8UR array and the full sloper K1THQ array prior to; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00034.html (8,696 bytes)
175. Topband: K8UR array (score: 2): Author: Ron Feutz <feutz@wctc.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 13:52:38 -0600; Topbanders, I have long wanted to put a K8UR array (1/2 wave dipole 4-square with center fed elements pulled back in at the bottom) or a similar array using straight dipole slopers, on a 240' SSV com; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00030.html (7,742 bytes)
176. Topband: 1/2 wave tower (score: 2): Author: gmguerin at voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin); Date: Wed Aug 20 09:09:32 2003; Ron, et. al., This issue was addressed recently on this reflector with a tall tower and big yagi that provided enough top loading to make the tower plus yagi about 1/2 wavelength tall. The three best; /archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00099.html (8,929 bytes)
177. Topband: Top Ban Vertical Antenna Design (Javier - YV5MBX) (score: 2): Author: jlopez at plasticosomega.com (Plasticos Omega); Date: Thu Mar 6 18:15:16 2003; Hi, I have plans to be in a coastal are for the next CQWW WPX CW-Contest, in the area I?ll not have any chance to hang-up either dipoles, slopers, loops, etc... So the only chance that I have is thin; /archives//html/Topband/2003-03/msg00019.html (6,876 bytes)
178. Topband: Top Loading Summary (score: 2): Author: herbs@vitelcom.net (Herb Schoenbohm); Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:47:35 -0400; Dear Fellow Topbanders: After miserable performance with my shunt 76 foot Rohn 25G (like calling a 599 RA6AX for an hour and a half without a contact) I sent an e-mail to this reflector about my amaz; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00114.html (10,696 bytes)
179. Topband: Vertical Delta vs Sloper (score: 2): Author: nmt@at-communication.com (Nodir M. Tursoon-Zadeh); Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 10:22:27 +0500; I going to participate in comming CQ WW 160 CW. Setup IC775DSP and Acom 1000 (1KW). I am planning to use 63 m support tower for temporary installation. I have two options- to install vertical delta f; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00055.html (6,750 bytes)
180. Topband: 160 Vertical (score: 2): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree); Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:41:50 -0700; This would have been my advice as well. I have what is probably a half sized situation (something that used to be used as a loaded 1/4 wave tower on 160 and it worked well. I put a quarter wave slope; /archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00055.html (8,161 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]