Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n9bx@mchsi.com: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: INVERTD L Reactance (score: 1)
Author: n9bx@mchsi.com
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:14:45 +0000
My inverted L is about 65 to 70 Foot Vertical, with the rest horizantal. I have attached the Ground Braid of my coax to an aluminum Plate about 2.5 feet in Diameter that has 66 holes drilled on the o
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00058.html (7,583 bytes)

2. Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Osterberg <n9bx@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:00:19 -0500
Since being New to this Reflector and not looking at too many of the past posts, I would like to know, which transceiver that people would recommend for 160 meter DX Use? I must admit I am confused b
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00074.html (6,946 bytes)

3. Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Osterberg <n9bx@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:40:30 -0500
Thanks very much for all of the Wonderful comments on the different rigs out there. And also the links to Tom's site and his reports on several of the rigs we all seem to be using. I have an FT-1000M
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00092.html (7,552 bytes)

4. Topband: Receive 4 Square Array 160 (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Osterberg <n9bx@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:21:36 -0500
Hi: While reading Low Band DXing, and also some work by W8JI, and WB4BCR on how to build a receive 4 Square array, I see that terrain is an important factor. Unlike a Beverage that can follow the gro
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00160.html (6,884 bytes)

5. Topband: MFJ-1025/1026 and Receiving Antennas (score: 1)
Author: n9bx@mchsi.com
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:06:55 +0000
Good Morning: Just received an MFJ-1026 and will hook it up this weekend. But I have one question that I Hope someone may be able to answer. The Two Receiving Antennas that I plan to use are a 540' B
/archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00216.html (7,275 bytes)

6. Topband: Flag antenna Gain: (score: 1)
Author: n9bx@mchsi.com
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:20:06 +0000
While Waiting for the placement of a 4-square receiving antenna, and the ground to unfreeze here north of Chicago, I decided to put up a Flag Antenna. I used the demensions of 14' vert. and 29 feet h
/archives//html/Topband/2009-02/msg00135.html (7,873 bytes)

7. Topband: Active 4 Square Receiving Array: (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Osterberg <n9bx@mchsi.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 08:01:59 -0500
Good Morning: I have one of the HIZANTENNA 4 Square Systems set up here in Illinois: Lee,K7TJR is an excellent and accurate source of information for this Array. My Array is on an 80 Foot Square and
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00050.html (7,623 bytes)

8. Topband: 160meter vertical base loaded vs Top loaded. (score: 1)
Author: n9bx@mchsi.com
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:45:38 +0000
Good Morning: I am currently using a 70' base loaded vertical over about 70 random length radial from 60-140 feet in length. The base loaded coil is from array solutions and has a 6" diameter coil. T
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00093.html (7,229 bytes)

9. Topband: Capacity Hat Wires not across from each other. (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Osterberg <n9bx@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:11:13 -0500
Hello: When I model a 70' Vertical with Capacity Wires that slope down from each other at a 180 Degree From the Top, they show a nice clean Pattern and Great op Loading. But in Reality, I cannot get
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00161.html (6,939 bytes)

10. Topband: Top Loaded Verticals: (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Osterberg <n9bx@mchsi.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:26:34 -0600
Good Evening Bob: Forget the Extra 10 feet, Anything above the Top hat will not Help. Put the top Hat at the Top. Remember you were the one that had an 8 spoke top hat and wanted to get it higher. Yo
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00092.html (7,224 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu