Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nn4t@comcast.net: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Topband NOISE CANCELLERS (score: 1)
Author: nn4t@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 23:05:23 +0000 (UTC)
Tim. How does a device such as the NCC-1 work with diversity reception on the K3? Is it useful there or superfluous? -- Original Message -- From: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com> To: "Marcelo Chrispin" <m
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00258.html (12,058 bytes)

2. Topband: K levels and skew path on 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Steven R Daniel, D.D.S." <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:18:13 -0600
I was rereading the article by Cary Oler and Ted Cohen (N4XX), published in 1998, which provided a good primer for understanding, as much as we can, propagation on Topband. In one section the impact
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00237.html (7,261 bytes)

3. Topband: "Evil".. Really? (score: 1)
Author: "Steven R Daniel, D.D.S." <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:05:03 -0600
Edmund Burke was a great thinker and observer of mankind and politics. I suspect he would view all this gnashing of teeth over such a trivial matter as just what it is: a waste of time and energy. IS
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00182.html (7,913 bytes)

4. Topband: "Clueless" operators (score: 1)
Author: "Steven R Daniel, D.D.S." <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:16:35 -0500
In my 40 years of DXing I have encountered my share of "clueless operators", even on Topband. I am reasonably certain most of them were not operating remotely. The recent decision by the ARRL should
/archives//html/Topband/2015-04/msg00013.html (7,127 bytes)

5. Topband: The Remote question (score: 1)
Author: nn4t@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 13:32:30 +0000 (UTC)
Good morning. I have followed with interest the discussion on this subject. I enjoyed hearing both sides of the issue from my fellow DXers. Most of the replies have been both thoughtful and respectfu
/archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00085.html (8,392 bytes)

6. Topband: Tracking entities (score: 1)
Author: "Steven R Daniel, D.D.S." <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 10:32:03 -0600
Good morning. I am searching for the most efficient way to monitor the activity of the countries I still need on 160 (other bands also). Currently I am going to DX Summit, putting on the 160 filter a
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00004.html (6,806 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: A "valid" QSO???? (score: 1)
Author: nn4t@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 14:28:18 +0000 (UTC)
For DXCC purposes a signal report is not required. In submitting a contact for credit only the call signs of the two stations, DXCC entity, time, date and mode are required. I realized this is only f
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00392.html (10,781 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: directional receive and contests (score: 1)
Author: nn4t@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:36:45 +0000 (UTC)
Good morning Art. I have used the AY Technologies 8 position switch. I can instantly switch between any of the 8 beverages and can also select any two simultaneously. I use this more for DXing than c
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00432.html (10,496 bytes)

9. Topband: 4 square (score: 1)
Author: Steve Daniel <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 07:17:55 -0600
Sent from my iPhone _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00195.html (6,517 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: 4 square (score: 1)
Author: "Steven R Daniel, D.D.S." <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:02:58 -0600
Thanks Tim. I should have done my homework. Now I have 8 580 terminated beverages with Array Solutions transformers and terminating resistors. They are quite robust but when the warmer, less stable w
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00198.html (9,342 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: nn4t@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:47:31 +0000 (UTC)
Gentlemen. I wonder if Tree regrets beginning this discussion with his post the other day? I suspect he might. The discussion of ethics has been interesting to me. Most of the comments have been thou
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00421.html (12,310 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1)
Author: "Steven R Daniel, D.D.S." <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 09:50:43 -0600
I am under the impression that most contests have rules regarding the proximity of both the transmitter/transmitters and antenna/antennas used for receiving purposes. At the moment I do not believe D
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00152.html (15,435 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: VU2GSM webSDR use (score: 1)
Author: "Steven R Daniel, D.D.S." <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:15:20 -0600
Good evening Paul. I cannot speak for your personal remote but I can tell you the rules at RHR: you identify the state (or grid if on FT8 or JT65) of the station from which you are transmitting. Thos
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00163.html (10,891 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: cheating (score: 1)
Author: Steve Daniel <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:32:13 -0600
John, is the use of a remote receiver not allowed for DXCC? I dont believe it is prohibited. I ask because your use of the word cheating suggests that it is. Is that what you are saying? Steve Daniel
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00182.html (8,477 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: cheating (score: 1)
Author: STEVE DANIEL <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 21:23:38 -0600 (CST)
Guy. You did it the "hard" way did you? I have been a ham and DXer since 1973 and have always encountered people like you. "You don't know how hard it was when I was your age. You have no idea how ha
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00197.html (13,483 bytes)

16. Topband: E31 (score: 1)
Author: "Steven R Daniel, D.D.S." <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:46:54 -0600
I called unsuccessfully for quite some time. I noticed that, on the stations I could spot, he stayed within the range of 1-2 up. I did not spot anyone higher than that. Just FYI. Steve, NN4T -- This
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00238.html (6,504 bytes)

17. Topband: Beverage coax (score: 1)
Author: "Steven R Daniel, D.D.S." <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 13:43:49 -0500
Good day all. I have used the DX Engineering F6. Available in bulk (can't remember if 1000 feet or 500) it works well and is well constructed. Have eight 530' antennas each fed with a run of that cab
/archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00094.html (6,296 bytes)

18. Topband: Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: STEVE DANIEL <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:52:59 -0500 (CDT)
Let's see. It has been at least five years since RHR's "remote operation for the masses" hit the air waves. After several years of hand-wringing, teeth gnashing and proclamations that the amateur wor
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00101.html (7,657 bytes)

19. Topband: Remote operations (score: 1)
Author: STEVE DANIEL <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:36:07 -0500 (CDT)
Do you think the ARRL failed to do their due diligence as to whether their new policy was in harmony with the FCC rules? And of course this is about remote operations. Steve Daniel NN4T _____________
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00105.html (6,598 bytes)

20. Topband: Fwd: Re: Remote operations (score: 1)
Author: STEVE DANIEL <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:42:45 -0500 (CDT)
Is it really necessary to insult me Roger? I asked what I thought to be question that is both relevant to the discussion and simple. You win Roger. Congratulations. Steve Daniel, NN4T _______________
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00110.html (8,198 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu