Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:zr@jeremy.mv.com: 406 ]

Total 406 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: LINEAR vs TOP LOADING (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:04:42 -0400
The linear loaded KLM 40 and 80M yagis never lived up to their hype. OTOH the little Cushcraft 2el 40 with loading coils plus a capacity hat way out on the elements is a proven winner. Ive sold one o
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00088.html (8,230 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Weatherproof enclosures? (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:08:35 -0400
Bud boxes at Mouser or Hammond which are more expensive. I had Hammonds up for over 20 years and there has never been any moisture ingress. Last year when deciding to go with 2 wire reversibles I bou
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00089.html (7,878 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: LINEAR vs TOP LOADING (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:30:43 -0400
Thats interesting Rick. One of the CC engineers wrote in QEX that high Q coils was not desired on their 40M. I dont remember exact details but it should be available thru the ARRL archives. The autho
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00106.html (8,141 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: Weatherproof enclosures? (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:39:51 -0400
The Hammonds I have used for over 20 years in the temperature and humidity extremes of NH are the basic 1591S series black ABS. Overkill may sound nice and may even be more covenient to obtain that s
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00109.html (11,756 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: 160 metre vertical with 'top loading' (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:49:48 -0400
With a sufficiently sized air coil the loss is very low, but with a ferrite toroid the core loss may be substantial. Loss in any form is additive to the ground loss. If forced into the situation Id u
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00129.html (15,907 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: RG6 coax questions (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:30:49 -0400
If someone goes to a reputable CATV supplies distributor they will match you up with the correct cable, connectors and tools the first time around. Do not try to buy piecemeal and expect things to ma
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00025.html (8,191 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: Asymmetric radials for GP antennas; Just in case others seek what I've just found... (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:17:00 -0400
Before I knew better, 30+ years ago, I had a 90' tower with 10-20 yagis shunt fed on 160. It was about 40' from the road on the NE thru SW side so many radials were very short and others ranged up to
/archives//html/Topband/2011-05/msg00051.html (12,243 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: Bi-Directional Beverage Question - DXE Polarity (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:38:32 -0400
Can you phase 2 wire reversible Beverages such as the offset close spaced type? Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2011-08/msg00016.html (11,230 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: soldering radials (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:27:06 -0400
Since the total current is divided into the number of radials you can compute the amount in each. I run 32 elevated all copper radials of #18 and 16 of a random mix and there is very, very, little po
/archives//html/Topband/2011-08/msg00040.html (11,124 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: soldering radials (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:29:09 -0400
To be brief: At a prior QTH a 100' tower was topped by 4 el 10/15/20 monobanders and shunt fed for 160. I started with 20 radials ranging from 60-130' to fit the property. Performance sucked for chas
/archives//html/Topband/2011-08/msg00046.html (11,249 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: RF attenuators (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:04:09 -0400
Ive tested dozens of CATV splitters over 25 or so years and they range from falling apart as high as 7-8MHZ and many good to 80 but useless at 160. By good I mean at least a 10dB RL (2:1 VSWR) and 20
/archives//html/Topband/2011-08/msg00064.html (10,120 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: Fabricated common mode chokes - Sourcing (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:30:16 -0400
Did you open up a Cushcraft balun to discover that method? I believe some other companies do similar and Teflon wire is used so it doesnt char as does THNN. Carl KM1H ________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2011-08/msg00080.html (9,572 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: Fabricated common mode chokes - Sourcing (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:02:59 -0400
With Sevick you had to wait an edition or two until he made corrections to some of his "assumptions". There was also a series in CQ that were often questionable. There would often be long discussions
/archives//html/Topband/2011-08/msg00085.html (11,257 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: Antenna Matching Question (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:09:15 -0400
Or a couple of relays to select band segment fixed caps. I did that at a prior QTH on 160 using 24VDC new surplus relays from All Electronics. Carl KM1H ______________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00008.html (10,858 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: Fence "ground screen" instead of wire radials? (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 14:50:58 -0400
I used 4' x 50' rabbit mesh (2x4") that was welded, then galvanized and then plastic dipped for over 10 years at a prior QTH. It was purchased that way at a garden store. Galvanizing is very easy to
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00017.html (9,823 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: New entry to TopBand with antenna question (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:43:44 -0400
-- Never discount the ability of a low horizontal to do amazing things at times on 160. This not to replace the vertical but to augment it. Wire and a coax switch is cheap. Many on here remember the
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00022.html (9,497 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: New entry to TopBand with antenna question (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:47:04 -0400
Maybe your transceiver. Mine have a seperate receive antenna port as built that can easily be returned to the TX antenna with a toggle switch. The alternative is a high isolation coax relay that only
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00054.html (12,970 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: Newbie Antenna Question (long) (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:36:54 -0400
Having a strong high angle lobe can be a benefit when seperate receiving antennas are used. It keeps locals further away and is a favorite trick of contesters on all bands. With yagis just feed a sma
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00055.html (10,042 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: Fence "ground screen" instead of wire radials? (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:27:43 -0400
It doesnt matter what the radiator length is, the maximum FEED current is at the base if its a base fed antenna. Sevick showed decades ago that a very dense field of short radials is superior to less
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00067.html (13,141 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: Fence "ground screen" instead of wire radials? (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:36:05 -0400
I guess I havent been getting thru to a couple on here possibly since I wasnt explaining it well enough. Lets start by saying that I never said maximum FEED current and the antennas point of maximum
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00074.html (11,918 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu