Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force12\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force12\s*$/: 62 ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 12:10:12 -0400; The worse thing anyone ever did to understanding how RF systems work was present SWR as "match efficiency" or "percent reflected power". That is absolutely incorrect Jon, unless you happen to be fee; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00105.html (9,714 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: jon.ogden@cain-forlaw.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:22:34 -0500; Tom, After thinking about it, you are correct. Obviously, power reflected from the antenna, will travel back down the line. Unless the source is purely dissipative as you say, some power will then be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00106.html (10,977 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 13:44:31 -0400; I'll certainly agree with that Tom. The quoted statement above is still correct if we modify it to indicate that "In a 2:1 environment, 88.9% of the generated power is the *minimum* power radiated b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00107.html (9,888 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 15:11:16 +0100; Amen to that!! Ever feel a badly designed antenna tuner when the swr goes to zero and the temp of the tuner goes to about 150 degrees? Lotsa loss there. Tom W7WHY List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00114.html (8,466 bytes)
25. [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com); Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 17:13:12 EDT; << In a message dated 10/4/01 9:19:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time, jon.ogden@cain-forlaw.com writes: << Tom, After thinking about it, you are correct. Obviously, power reflected from the antenna, will t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00129.html (17,043 bytes)
26. [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: rthorne@arn.net (Richard Thorne); Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 12:02:40 -0700; Not trying to stir things up but I'm sure all antenna companies have their positive's and negatives. On Friday, 04/25, Amarillo received 6 "s of snow. I have my Force12 C3 mounted on top of a 40' tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00874.html (7,039 bytes)
27. [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: Robert Hess <w1rh@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:43:29 -0700 (PDT); Anyone know if Force12 has antenna assembly manuals buried somewhere on their website? I have a brand new C19XR and may have misplaced the assembly instructions when moving from 1 land to 6 land. Bob; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00667.html (6,830 bytes)
28. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Tim Heger" <n3xx@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:40:23 -0400; I just ordered two antennas from Force 12, and they said the manuals for what I ordered aren't available to download. They are sending me both manuals in advance of the antennas. 73, Tim - N3XX _____; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00670.html (7,906 bytes)
29. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:58:18 -0700; Before I buy anything, I download the manual. After reading the manual, I often decide not to buy. If there is no manual to download, I don't buy it. Rick N6RK _______________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00671.html (8,945 bytes)
30. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Dan Hearn" <dhearn@air-pipe.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:20:11 -0700; One of the few things a ham can clone easily is an antenna. Most of us have a pile of aluminum tubing and could easily build a copy of a $2000 antenna design. There is a great deal of engineering exp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00673.html (10,558 bytes)
31. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:50:03 -0600; So we have some 'unreasonable' antenna manufactures like Hy-Gain, CushCraft, and Spiderbeam who do make their manuals available. What about defunct manufacturers like Wilson or KLM? What about antenn; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00674.html (7,855 bytes)
32. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Walker" <jim@walkersdomain.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:18:48 -0500; I've never had a problem obtaining manuals from any equipment/antenna other than Force12. I once purchased a C4XL from a ham who had misplaced the instruction manual. Called Force12 and was told, we; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00675.html (10,023 bytes)
33. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:44:16 +0000; The manuals don't help much, anyway. Instructions are vague and the pictures are really pitiful - they look like copies of copies of copies. Hopefully the new owner(s) will use these comments constru; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00676.html (11,112 bytes)
34. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL" <grimm@sbc.edu>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:09:21 -0400; This is where BAMA can be useful. While I intended BAMA to be for tube type amateur gear, I've provided storage space for quite a lot of test gear and even some solid state stuff. Actually, there are; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00677.html (9,751 bytes)
35. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL" <grimm@sbc.edu>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:31:39 -0400; Ain't it the truth! Compared to some of the latest version SteppIR manuals, the Force 12 manuals are "uninspiring." The SteppIR manuals are available for downloading from the SteppIR web site, are in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00680.html (8,538 bytes)
36. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:39:48 -0700; I'd bet that the manuals for many amateur antennas are indeed copies of copies, and a master copy in digital format probably never existed in the first place. In those cases, the manufacturers probab; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00681.html (9,689 bytes)
37. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:11:25 -0700; I was talking about a MANUAL for the antenna, not a set of BLUEPRINTS describing everything needed to clone it. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _____________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00684.html (12,237 bytes)
38. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:50:41 -0700; This all brings up some interesting points, moral, ethical, and legal. 1) Indeed a company may invest significant time, effort, and funds in developing a good design, both mechanical and electrical.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00686.html (11,189 bytes)
39. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Pat Poirier" <hkman@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:39:19 -0400; Why is everyone getting all worked up about the fact that Force 12 doesn't have their manuals on the web? It is not a big deal, all you have to ask on this reflector or any of the others antenna/towe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00690.html (13,794 bytes)
40. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Dennis Vernacchia" <n6ki73@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:44:20 -0700; ...And don't forget, you don't get ALL the parts with your antenna kit, especially some of the critical ones, even after many phone calls... Then, F12 will tell you how to go to home depot to make yo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00696.html (15,448 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]