Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dick.green@VALLEY.NET: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: [YCCC] QST business decisions (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Sat Jan 12 00:26:26 2002
I posted this as a reply to another post on the YCCC reflector. I was asked to cross-post it here: I don't think anyone is asking HQ to make a decision that would result in less profit or a loss for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00227.html (10,937 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Time to Get Off the Pot (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Wed Jan 23 00:51:11 2002
I was asked to write an introduction to contesting that appeared in the November 2000 QST under the title, "Discover the Wonderful World of Contesting" (my title, so don't blame the editors if you t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00463.html (18,677 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] ARRL BoD Meeting Minutes (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Fri Jan 25 00:08:52 2002
Reading between the lines, I'd say the delay is not just to buy time for us to get more comfortable. It looks like the Board is divided on the issue. The length and complexity of the resolution sugge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00548.html (10,222 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Photos of SO2R Layouts, 2nd Iteration? (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Wed Feb 27 11:28:13 2002
Jeff, The second iteration is similar to my setup, except I use autotune amps that are away from the operating desk. Also, I don't use any shelving in my setup -- the radios sit on the desk and the c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00404.html (10,259 bytes)

5. RE: [CQ-Contest] FT1000 or FT1000MP? (LONG) (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:22:16 -0500
Steve, IMHO, The 1000D is a much better contest rig than the MP and is much better on the low bands as well. The MP always sounds muffled to me by comparison. My biggest beef with the MP is the AGC,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00024.html (13,632 bytes)

6. RE: [CQ-Contest] LOTW question (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:37:44 -0500
Dallas, You don't have to use an e-mail attachment to send the log. You can upload it directly using the LoTW web site. Just log on to your account and click on "Upload File." 73, Dick WC1M -- The wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00025.html (9,531 bytes)

7. RE: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete LoTW QSL Records, Worthless ??? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:23:06 -0500
A few quick comments on this thread: 1. Paper QSLs can be incomplete, too -- no county, grid, zone, etc. 2. Incomplete station data in LoTW isn't the only problem. Sometimes the station data is incor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00146.html (18,795 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] SO2R Orion - 4 bands at once? 4 amps? Hoy! (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Fri May 9 02:03:20 2003
Scott, I think the ORION is a remarkable achievement, and completely understand Ten-Tec's decision not to build a very expensive radio for the exceedingly small number of SO2R ops in the market. Howe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00078.html (19,827 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] More on Orion de W4PA (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Sat May 10 04:00:01 2003
Yes, but you can pick off a lot more multipliers if you can hear the second receiver *during* the CQs. At 34 WPM, it takes about 6 seconds to send my CQ and I usually set the delay between CQs to 2-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00101.html (14,105 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] solar cycle progress and prediction (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Sun May 11 21:33:25 2003
FWIW, I recently did a little study of band-by-band results for selected New England top-ten single-op stations in CQWW CW and ARRL DX CW correlated with the smoothed sunspot numbers (SSN) for Novem
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00125.html (8,922 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] self spotting vs other cheating (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Wed May 28 14:10:45 2003
Nice idea. BTW, the LoTW key pair could be used for this application. It's already authenticated by ARRL, so most of the first three steps would be unnecessary. You would, however, have to send the L
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00296.html (11,989 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Band condx - 10/15 for FD 2003 (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Tue Jul 1 01:04:36 2003
At W1FN (Twin State Radio Club, NH/VT), our 2A had an A4 tribander at 50', a 40-2CD 2-el 40m at 50', an 80m half-square at about 70' and a 160m horizontal loop (works on all bands) at about 70'. We d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00007.html (8,046 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] RE: [YCCC] 40 meters to be fixed (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Sat Jul 5 14:22:06 2003
Ah, just in time for the sunspot peak to make 40m our fourth-best HF contest band. Looks like the compromise will help CW contesting more than it will help SSB contesting. Once the broadcasters are g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00075.html (7,928 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Log checking Revisited (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Sun Jul 13 22:44:46 2003
That's why I logged it as "VRONA", then edited it to be VERONA in the Cabrillo file. 73, Dick WC1M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00161.html (10,073 bytes)

15. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:03:21 -0400
When applying for a cert for an old, expired callsign, you must sign it with the cert you got for your current call. To do so, select "Signed" when prompted by TQSLcert during the cert request proced
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00295.html (13,178 bytes)

16. RE: [CQ-Contest] LOTW problems (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:03:21 -0400
There was a problem with the first version of TQSLcert that went out. Download the latest version from the LoTW website (www.arrl.org/lotw) and the problem with accepting the private key will be fixe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00296.html (9,718 bytes)

17. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:35:15 -0400
Bruce, I would contact the league and see if they will accept a mailed CD-ROM containing your signed logs (assuming you have CD-R capability.) During the design phase, there was some talk about accep
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00297.html (13,606 bytes)

18. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW question (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:42:14 -0400
Chuck, First, I don't think LoTW will reduce your chances of getting a paper QSL, as long as you send an SASE. I have to believe that the vast majority of hams will recognize and respect your cost an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00298.html (14,332 bytes)

19. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@VALLEY.NET>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:49:31 -0400
While I agree with Darryl that the most secure method is for a DX station to send a CD-R with a signed log to a QSL manager for upload to LoTW, this may not be feasible or desirable in all cases. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00315.html (14,194 bytes)

20. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:21:17 -0400
Bob, I *was* an advisor to ARRL during the design phase of LoTW, almost two years ago. During that period, I refrained from making public comments about LoTW because I was not an official spokesperso
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00347.html (19,248 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu