Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] multiple dipoles (score: 1)
Author: jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com (Jerry Connelly)
Date: Thu Jun 12 15:59:01 2003
Hello I currently have a modest tower (40') with 10' of 2" dia. hi-tensile mast and a 4 el 10m monobander mounted at 48'. I have two cross arms at 39' for hanging wire antennas. I currently have a 75
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00190.html (7,175 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] close dipoles (score: 1)
Author: jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com (Jerry Connelly)
Date: Thu Jun 12 15:59:37 2003
Hello I currently have a modest tower (40') with 10' of 2" dia. hi-tensile mast and a 4 el 10m monobander mounted at 48'. I have two cross arms at 39' for hanging wire antennas. I currently have a 75
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-06/msg00191.html (7,162 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] baloon supported wire verticals (score: 1)
Author: jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com (Jerry Connelly)
Date: Fri Apr 4 09:36:51 2003
After reading this and a little more thought.....has anyone tried using two baloons with a dipole strung between them? Use two anchor lines on each baloon pulling away from the other baloon in an X p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00046.html (11,133 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] 30 ft height restriction (score: 1)
Author: jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com (Jerry Connelly)
Date: Sat Apr 5 17:18:28 2003
When I sterted getting permit applications to put up my small 40 to 50' tower I learned of our city ordinance which said that antennas and antenna supports fall under accessory structures and have a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00081.html (7,300 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Thrust Bearing = UHMW cutting boards... (score: 1)
Author: jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com (Jerry Connelly)
Date: Tue Apr 15 16:13:32 2003
I'm not totally sure about this but there is a uhmw we use in our materials handling chutes that is supposed to be uv stabalized. Its called "TYVAR 88". There are several grades of TYVAR but the 88 i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00240.html (12,582 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] Knots: engage brain, save your life. (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com (Jerry Connelly)
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:57:54 -0500
Engage brain, save your life??? How much is your life worth? Mine is worth enough that I would think twice about using just anything (even for a safety line). My tower is short (only 40') but most of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00664.html (10,824 bytes)

7. Fw: [Towertalk] silver solder ok for Ground wire to rod ? (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com (Jerry Connelly)
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:51:46 -0400
Don I am the first to admit that I am not an expert, but I understand that the ground system's first jobs are to provide a ground reference for rf and to eliminate static charge buildup that could at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00196.html (10,169 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] Fuel pump noise (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com (Jerry Connelly)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:02:28 -0400
Hello all Sorry if this is the wrong place to post this but you guys seem to know just about everything (even if you don't allways agree). I finally came up with enough spare funds to upgrade my mobi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00473.html (7,309 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] re: fuel pump noise (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com (Jerry Connelly)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:55:06 -0400
Thanks and sorry about the wrong reflector for this. My old vehicle was a 97 Jeep Cherokee. Just replaced it with a 99. Both are company lease vehicles so I have to be careful what I do to them for p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00480.html (7,176 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Re: An Enlightning Experience (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:02:03 -0400
Three years ago I had a nearby strike come in on the power lines. The only damage was my computer's power supply (or so I thought). Over the next month the rest of the damage showed itself. My radio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00857.html (7,131 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] 80 or 160 loop?? (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 19:35:33 -0500
Hello all After a long drawn out process I have received permission from the adjacent property owner to allow me to install one or more wire antennas over an unused abandoned parking area. The area i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00628.html (7,518 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] 80 or 160 loop?? thanks and two final questions (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 19:24:17 -0500
Thanks to all that took time to pass on their opinions and experience. I am one of those who plans something so much I sometimes fail to get past the planning stage but hopefully this time will be di
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00107.html (8,881 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Question for loop users (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 13:16:16 -0500
Hello all I finally got my 80m loop up yesterday. I used the ARRL antenna handbook's "loop skywire" design. Wire is 272' for resonance at 3.7 mhz and fed with 450 ohm ladderline about 1' off a corner
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00271.html (9,225 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] question for loop users (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 07:47:58 -0500
Hello all Thanks for the good replies. I finally have most of the questions answered. I tried adding about 5 feet of feedline (ladder line) and the swr went up on all bands. So I started trimming a l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00337.html (7,892 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] 160M inverted L (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:13:58 -0500
Hello all I'm trying to get something up for 160m. I've been using my 80m loop and a tuner but its real hard to tune and not very effecient. Maby when I get my balanced tuner project done that won't
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00007.html (8,190 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] ground radial question (160m inverted L and otherverticals) (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:23:00 -0500
Thanks to everyone who gave their advice on my 160m question. I am still trying to digest it all and decide what to do. I will probably put up a 160m inverted L first and later (when I remove the cb
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00116.html (8,253 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] ground radial question (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:15:57 -0500
Thanks to everyone who gave their advice on my 160m question. I am still trying to digest it all and decide what to do. I will probably put up a 160m inverted L first and later (when I remove the cb
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00122.html (7,752 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] 160m inverted L now up (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 15:51:31 -0500
Hello to all. Better weather and a few hours of daylight before leaving for work this morning and I have a new 160m inverted L in the air but untried. It didn't go as planned and I need some advice,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00166.html (8,848 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m inverted L now up (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 08:47:39 -0500
Gene and the group An unexpexted trip to an Aunt's house to help her with something cut short my antenna testing last night. I did make about 3 contacts. All were somewhat close (less than 350 miles)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00181.html (12,680 bytes)

20. [TowerTalk] RE: [Tower Talk] 160m inverted L now up (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Connelly" <jerryc@clinchrivercorp.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:46:38 -0500
Tod I did download this info but haven't had a chance (gotta work) to digest the math yet. From first look it appears as though one would have to keep it low to the ground due to the maximum height a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00187.html (9,674 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu