Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k-zero-hb@earthlink.net: 380 ]

Total 380 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:37:31 -00
spotted don't want to most Hey, even a nasty old purist like me could buy into this solution. The beauty of it is it's simplicity! 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00331.html (9,150 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 01:29:52 -00
N2IC responds: Interesting notion (I disagree, but it's still interesting). Let's take this a step further then. B4 the SS phone weekend I populate a "mental bandmap" with the Sunday QTR/QRG of sever
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00335.html (10,893 bytes)

43. RE: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 16:07:29 -00
-- http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb the I don't think the WRTC shoot-outs can be used as a "Gold Standard" against which to compare other contest rules. When every other contest includes an impart
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00350.html (10,653 bytes)

44. RE: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 16:11:52 -00
Thank you, David, for so clearly making my point. Packet in contests seems to be a crutch for those who are not Radiomen enough to find their own Q's. 73, de Hans, K0HB _____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00351.html (8,791 bytes)

45. RE: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:53:39 -00
Internet As you know, Tim, I'm very much a "boy and his radio" kind of contester. In that mindset, any information which doesn't reach me via my antenna-connector/headset route doesn't belong in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00369.html (9,440 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:29:01 -00
Steve, Haven't you heard? Starting with the 2006 contest season it will be illegal to have a human Radioman on the premises during the contest. Just a lot of cluster-robots working each other. 73, d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00394.html (9,708 bytes)

47. RE: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW Trick (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:22:42 -00
Rubber clocking isn't even the same thing, since it involves lying about the time a station was worked. Manually scanning the bands to find the QRG of a number of stations before the opening bell do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00399.html (9,862 bytes)

48. [CQ-Contest] Contesting headset? (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:49:20 -00
My Heil "ProSet" headset is due for a replacement (hopefully b4 SS phone this weekend). Have been pretty satisfied, but always on the lookout for something better. Has anyone here used the newer "Pro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00409.html (7,907 bytes)

49. RE: [CQ-Contest] Rules, debates, and other annual occurances (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:42:08 -00
Hey, I know I'm like Don Quixote, tilting at a windmill, but humor an old "purist" coot just once more. What is this business about leveling the playing field? Everything I do in the area of contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00489.html (8,353 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Next BIG Step in contesting (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:13:31 -00
Tom Taormina, K5RC replied: for still instead. I'm with the "OF" on this one. One of my other favorite hobbies is deer hunting, and there are a lot of similarities. Both have hardware tools (rifles/r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00518.html (11,042 bytes)

51. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:44:54 -00
At my advanced age I sometimes forget the date on my first license. Maybe the same with them. I guess that confounds those who depend on a database for the information rather than actually copying w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00559.html (9,340 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:29:09 -00
Awwww, those rascals, kicking the crutches away from cripples! For shame! 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00611.html (9,305 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:32:05 -00
<cq-contest@contesting.com> This is an idea which should not be tossed aside lightly. It should be HURLED ASIDE WITH GREAT FORCE since it would effectively eliminate the northern tier states (especi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00645.html (10,066 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Again (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 04:12:43 -00
an Bill, I run SS with what I call SO1.5R. Main rig (IC775/AL1200) and an old bullet-proof R4C on an 18AVQ that I use to hunt for mults. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb ____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00682.html (8,024 bytes)

55. RE: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:30:23 -00
Hey, those last three hours are when us Black-Holers make our move on you propagationally advantaged southern Bubbas! If you don't want to work those three hours, then work an additional three hours
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00697.html (8,128 bytes)

56. [CQ-Contest] Be careful (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 01:05:52 -00
Be careful what you wish for..... .....you might get it. All this sentiment for a "level playing field" flies directly in the face of what competition is all about. The very essence of radiosport con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00821.html (9,706 bytes)

57. RE: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 03:25:31 -00
My guess is that there >>almost certainly<< will be a clear separation of scores, in the favor of those operators who have developed an additional competitive skill. To make a rule change to neutral
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00832.html (9,895 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Be careful (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:06:06 -00
Bill, We're not as far apart in our thinking as you might assume. I'd like to see just one less class SO than you propose -- dump that wimpy "limited" thing -- only you and Diana Moon Glompers are i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00843.html (8,127 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:13:30 -00
Diana Moon Glompers would love it. A true celebration of vanilla-mediocrity. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00844.html (9,423 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:10:07 -00
Thank you George. You absolutely NAILED it. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Operating SO1.5R (A 10 year-old 775 and a 40 year old R4C) know running put out categories. categories QST meter article _____________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00848.html (14,158 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu