CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again

To: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>,"Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:13:30 -00
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>
> Limited class would spell out the hardware limits specifically, much
> like the WRTC does already.  It would be oriented toward a "typical"
> ham station, not a contest station.  I would suggest one radio, no
> packet or other spotting assistance, one antenna per band, dipoles
> only and a height restriction.  "Dipole" could be defined to be any
> antenna with the equivalent gain of a dipole.  This would allow
> inverted vees, quarter wave GPs, etc.
>

Diana Moon Glompers would love it.  A true celebration of
vanilla-mediocrity.  

73, de Hans, K0HB




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>