Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n8xx@arrl.org: 188 ]

Total 188 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [CQ-Contest] CWops Tests Wednesday/Thursday (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:12:13 -0500
The CWops tests moved from every other week to weekly tests. However, for the older fogeys amongst us - including me - it is hard to remember the day of the week (regardless of whether or not we admi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00121.html (8,785 bytes)

142. [CQ-Contest] Back to basics (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:24:30 -0500
With all this discussion (whining) about SO Assisted, I suggest EVERY Contest, by executive fiat, go back to 1. Spark gap 2. Coherer Detectors 3. NO automatic switching from transmit to receive 4. Ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00270.html (7,018 bytes)

143. [CQ-Contest] The "high and mighty" syndrome on display (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:57:57 -0500
I've recently viewed a super display here in the forum of the "high and mighty syndrome" of a "self professed 'elite' contest operator" who showed, without a doubt, disdain for a "lower class, worthl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00377.html (8,604 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP, et. al. (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:04:18 -0500
Message: 11 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 23:25:44 -0600 From: "WT2P - C. Johnson"<fredwt2p@gmail.com> To:cq-contest@contesting.com Subject: [CQ-Contest] /QRP, et. al. Message-ID:<5493B6D8.6090207@gmail.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00381.html (7,693 bytes)

145. Re: [CQ-Contest] The"highandmighty"syndrome (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 15:06:37 -0500
I see much friviology and snarkines about "The High and Mighty" syndrome, but little discussion of how we recruit and educate newbies into the "exclusive club." Members of this "club" don't seem to w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00415.html (7,128 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] The"highandmighty"syndrome (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 23:28:50 -0500
Steve: I'm sure you're right - there ARE individuals who take mentoring seriously. But, you'd never know it by the recent b....ching and moaning here in CQ-Contest@contesting.com - concerning operati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00437.html (8,562 bytes)

147. Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Dupes (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:31:44 -0500
I've been working the ARRL Centennial (100 points for each station I contact). I find at least one, sometimes a half dozen or more, dupes during one of my 30 minutes to and hour session on a band/mod
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00446.html (8,201 bytes)

148. [CQ-Contest] Logging software for the Blind (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 17:40:29 -0500
I'm encouraging a fellow ham to try contesting. This ham is excellent with CW, does fine with SSB, etc., but has been totally without singht since early childhood. The major difficulty is logging. Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00453.html (7,494 bytes)

149. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging software for the Blind (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 14:30:25 -0500
Thanks to all who advised by private message. My friend will investigate the various suggestions for contesting aids, etc. 72/73 de n8xx Hg Message: 2 Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 17:40:29 -0500 From: Hank
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00462.html (8,786 bytes)

150. [CQ-Contest] Why? (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 00:46:33 -0500
Why is the RTTY Roundup so named? If I read the rules, all digital modes should have equal standing, i.e., RTTY (200 Hz or so wide), PSK-31 (30 Hz), BPSK-63 (about 70 Hz), etc. Should it not be calle
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00033.html (7,558 bytes)

151. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Why? (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 18:57:42 -0500
Andy: My only comment: Excellent analysis and hypotheses. How can we entice a sufficient number of contest ops "pack the bands" in a contest using BPSK (31 or 63) to determine if the bandwidth advant
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00057.html (15,073 bytes)

152. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW Op Name - Je suis Charlie (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:11:59 -0500
Je annonce que "JE SUIS CHARLIE" pendant la NAQP SSB cette semaine de fin prochaine. Si vous avez des difficultés, essayez http://translate.google.com 72/73 de n8xx Hg _______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00116.html (8,431 bytes)

153. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing the North America SSB Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:02:14 -0500
It is a bit tragic that there was so much apathy amongst the operators in the SSB Sprint PRIOR to ARRL/NCJ's decision to drop it. These apathetic few now grouse about that decision, but even they cit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00190.html (10,662 bytes)

154. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing the North America SSB Sprint-boycott from "MAR" (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:53:17 -0500
It's obvious that the contest is a US based contest. There's a BIG push to try to get ALL US States on - there's even a certificate of some sort if one works all 50 states. Perhaps instead of boycott
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00208.html (10,869 bytes)

155. [CQ-Contest] How to change rules in a Contest (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:14:44 -0500
Why don't we discuss something concerning something over which we have some control, like: "How many Angels can dance on the head of a pin?" We here in this contest will NOT be able to convince the o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00217.html (8,405 bytes)

156. [CQ-Contest] Where? (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 18:59:02 -0500
Where was all the support or the NA-Sprint when the contest community let it get to <50 logs being submitted in the last contest? If over 300 folks were interested in the contest, why did it die? 72/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00272.html (6,656 bytes)

157. Re: [CQ-Contest] Where? (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 22:49:58 -0500
Yeah, jack: But no one was interested enough to "rattle the cages, raise the flags, et. nausea" until it died, and was resurrected. I ask, why did the contest community have to let it drop into the d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00001.html (8,476 bytes)

158. Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:54:05 -0400
As of my latest count, there were over 40 "reports" for the Russian DX contest from North Ameroican stations. Probably not 100%, but not shabby. Remember, reporting in the 3830 reflector is optional.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00100.html (8,273 bytes)

159. [CQ-Contest] W8T - National Trails Day special Event Station, May 30, 1600Z to 2000Z (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 22:28:12 -0400
Not precisely a contest announcement, but we WILL be participating, to the extent possible, in the CQWPX CW contest! Please be advised that on Saturday, May, 30, between 1600Z and 2000Z, 4 or more ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00724.html (8,903 bytes)

160. [CQ-Contest] CW with FLDigi? (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 23:01:03 -0400
I'm trying to help a relative newcomer to set up his rig for the MiQP. He's just learning CW, we note that FLdigi can send and decode CW. I've used FLdigi for Hellschreiber and PSK-31, but never with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00062.html (7,512 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu