Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve7iu@runbox.com: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Noise Blanker Comparisons (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:11:42 -0800
There are discussions ongoing on the Ten-Tec reflectors on both yahoo groups and contesting.com about the noise blankers of the Triton IV, the Omni A/B/C, and the Corsairs. While noise blankers are b
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00147.html (8,254 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:54:40 -0800
And a BIG heatsink so a fan is not required, but optional.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00185.html (11,679 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:39:05 -0800
Ham A: "You are 15 Hz off frequency." Ham B: "What frequency am I on?" Ham A: "3810.015 kHz." Ham B: "That's odd, I called CQ on 3810.015 kHz and I am still transmitting on 3810.015 kHz. Must be your
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00291.html (9,836 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI mystery (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:13:45 -0700
Jim, Firstly, I am not an expert on the Omni VI. But I wonder if the signal you are hearing on the Omni VI frequency is not entirely what is being transmitted. Even very weak signals can be strong on
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00552.html (18,513 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] More Junk.... (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:23:32 -0700
I'm am also happy to see more products being developed for the amateur radio marketplace. Wow, I am amazed to see the negative comments generated by only a couple of computer generated images of a ra
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00059.html (9,937 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Wow, Mega Sale at Ten-Tec (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 13:34:55 -0700
Just saw the announcement of a big sale at Ten-Tec. http://www.tentec.com/sale/ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00010.html (6,565 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] TT Mega Sale (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 18:59:27 -0700
It makes no sense for RF Concepts to purchase Ten-Tec, liquidate their stock and assets, and shut down the business. When RF Concepts purchased Alpha, they reduced prices. Same tactic again? At those
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00068.html (10,172 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] On Noisy Transmitters (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 15:50:19 -0700
Would you publish this list? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00163.html (9,963 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Can't manage Argonaut VI memories with setup539 GIU? (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:32:15 -0700
I seem to recall something about Carl's N4PY software being able to load and save a memory file. I could be wrong though. 73, Darrell VE7IU _______________________________________________ TenTec mail
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00915.html (10,276 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Alternative Eagle Form Factor was Re: Status (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive VE7IU <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 07:57:41 -0800
I've been thinking about this idea of a bigger form factor for the Eagle, the ensuing discussion, and thought I would post my wish list. Perhaps if others join in with their wish lists, John Henry an
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00124.html (15,875 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Dirty Transmitters - Flex and Yaesu (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive VE7IU <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 05:45:01 -0800
It took a very long time for Rob Sherwood's judgements to take hold and for real change to happen. The fact that some manufacturers are taking steps to improve the cleanliness of transmitters is enco
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00237.html (11,754 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Dirty Transmitters - Flex and Yaesu (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive VE7IU <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:57:46 -0800
There are so many things to consider when one chooses a radio. I went through this recently. In my case I wanted the brand, form factor, and ergonomics of the Kenwood TS-590S, the continued developme
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00249.html (11,583 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Dirty Transmitters - Flex and Yaesu (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive VE7IU <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:34:25 -0800
http://www.dj0ip.de/app/download/5794190002/Elecraft+K3+rev+c.pdf http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/elecraft_k3_receive_audio.htm As Rob noted, Elecraft did address this 8 years ago, but it was not
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00254.html (13,893 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Transmitters... (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive VE7IU <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:48:52 -0800
Check this out: http://www.k9yc.com/TXNoise.pdf And lots of great stuff by Jim at: http://www.k9yc.com/publish.htm On 15-12-10 09:38 AM, Kimberly Elmore wrote: This harks back to something Rick touch
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00260.html (8,367 bytes)

15. [TenTec] Radio Complexity was Re: Dirty Transmitters - Flex and Yaesu (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive VE7IU <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:42:00 -0800
I agree Jim, these issues are very personal and what one operator finds intuitive, another may not. That is why we have many choices when it comes to radios. Personally I like the boat anchor ergonom
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00268.html (16,917 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Radio Complexity was Re: Dirty Transmitters - Flex and Yaesu (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive VE7IU <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:10:08 -0800
I disagree. The comparison is quite valid as it depends on the criteria you are comparing. In my case my shortlist of rigs was the K3, Eagle, and TS-590S. I chose the Eagle. Since then the K3S and TS
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00275.html (22,420 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Pimp My Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:24:38 -0800
Rick, I agree with most of your suggestions. My comments: 1) SIZE - The size of the box and number of controls are directly related to the cost of the radio. Controls are expensive. So be prepared fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-01/msg00148.html (17,676 bytes)

18. [TenTec] IC-7300 was Re: Omni VI instability, TCXO worth it? (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 09:23:31 -0700
This is Icom's first try with a direct sampling radio and from everything I have read, they seem to have done a lot of things right and have produced a good product. Yes, it does have some issues and
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00086.html (23,649 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group -tuner and dipoles (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:26:54 -0700
That may work well for receiving, but for transmitting the ground losses at such a low height would be substantial. QRP with 100 watts. :-) 73, Darrell VE7IU NVIS brought back 80m to usefulness for F
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00192.html (9,623 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group -tuner and dipoles (score: 1)
Author: Darrell Bellerive <ve7iu@runbox.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:45:24 -0700
A couple more good reads: http://www.seed-solutions.com/gregordy/Amateur%20Radio/Experimentation/Vee/YagiModel.htm http://www.w8ji.com/nvis_n_v_i_s_antenna.htm 73, Darrell VE7IU The usefulness of ver
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00200.html (11,712 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu