Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wes_n7ws@triconet.org: 281 ]

Total 281 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 20:05:13 -0700
For an illustration try this: http://www.cuminglehman.com/wp-content/uploads/Introduction_to_Antenna_Test_Ranges_Measurements_Instrumentation.pdf and look at the figure on  page 4.  This shows the us
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00051.html (11,679 bytes)

242. Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 06:23:15 -0700
and look at the figure on  page 4.  This shows the usual antenna range situation where the test antenna is receiving a signal from a point, or small aperture source.  This is how I would run this com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00055.html (10,777 bytes)

243. Re: [TowerTalk] Boom Material (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 11:51:17 -0700
It depends.  Electrically you will be fine unless you're using a published design that used through-the-boom elements, in which case there might need to be adjustments. Physically it will depend on m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00065.html (7,580 bytes)

244. Re: [TowerTalk] Earth Ground: How good is good enough (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:43:38 -0700
https://archive.org/download/TNM_Manual_on_earth-resistance_testing_-_James_G__20180125_0208/TNM_Manual_on_earth-resistance_testing_-_James_G__20180125_0208.pdf One of my heroes of the late 20th cent
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00100.html (13,224 bytes)

245. Re: [TowerTalk] tower climbing shoes or boots - suggestions    needed (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 13:53:05 -0700
Another vote for Thunderbird.  I switched to it when Eudora went away. Wes  N7WS For many years, I've used Thunderbird as an email client, and before that, a similar program carried over from OS/2. B
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00170.html (8,874 bytes)

246. Re: [TowerTalk] Eudora (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:59:30 -0700
It's been a long time but IIRC, it went away for me when it wasn't free anymore. Wes On 9/19/2021 1:21 PM, Pete Michaelis - N8TR wrote: Eudora never went away.  It works fine with Windows 10. I have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00174.html (8,885 bytes)

247. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding -- yet again (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:13:20 -0700
W8JI.com I have a full quarter wave vertical made from Rohn 45. It has the broadcast tower insulator section 27 feet above ground and I use 1/8th wave radials with an inductor for tuning to resonance
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-10/msg00106.html (7,639 bytes)

248. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling Rohn 25G in K6STI's AO (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 23:01:10 -0700
Dan's AutoEZ + EZNEC does it all. Wes  N7WS On 10/23/2021 6:12 PM, Lux, Jim wrote: On 10/23/21 6:01 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote: AO was great! The program allowed you to use variables for the wires so ch
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-10/msg00174.html (9,354 bytes)

249. Re: [TowerTalk] FA-VA5 question (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 10:21:00 -0700
Since you don't want to read any manuals, this is probably a moot point, but the VNWA software has TDR provisions.  Whether you can get enough data out of the FA-VA5 or not isn't clear to me without
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-11/msg00016.html (8,375 bytes)

250. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M Antenna puzzlement (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 09:25:16 -0700
I second this idea. Wes  N7WS On 12/19/2021 9:11 AM, Wes Attaway wrote: Without going into all the feedline details, why not just add the extra wire to the far end of the horizontal portion? If you d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-12/msg00040.html (10,825 bytes)

251. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M Antenna puzzlement (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 09:55:03 -0700
Another thought. I'm a little short of space between the vertical part of my L and the tower which supports the far end of the loading wire.  So I feature it; the feedpoint is capacitive and below 50
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-12/msg00044.html (10,452 bytes)

252. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M Antenna puzzlement (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:09:38 -0700
He already has the feedpoint Z. "Measuring the SWR and R/X at the base of the antenna with my Rig Experts AA-55 Zoom," If he removes the loading inductance and trims the wire for -j25 (and the R stay
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-12/msg00049.html (11,156 bytes)

253. Re: [TowerTalk] TT QSY? (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:12:29 -0700
I still miss newsgroups. Wes  N7WS _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-12/msg00096.html (8,204 bytes)

254. Re: [TowerTalk] Change? (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:13:20 -0700
Me too. Wes  N7WS -- 73 de KG2V Charlie Agreed. Please don't move it to Groups.io or any other HTML/web based format. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2021-12-22 11:26 AM, Warren Wolff via TowerTalk wrote: TT is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-12/msg00097.html (7,846 bytes)

255. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 14:55:51 -0700
I've already posted a copy of what N7CL posted to this group years ago.  His work, as well as the work of others, can also be found in ON4UN's  "Low Band DXing" starting on page 9-14 of the 5th editi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-01/msg00043.html (10,086 bytes)

256. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 13:46:23 -0700
Also see the old discussion with actual measurements by W8JI (in GA soil) http://lists.contesting.com/_topband/1996-10/msg00237.html Ignacy, NO9E A treasure trove in one thread, especially near the e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-01/msg00050.html (9,545 bytes)

257. Re: [TowerTalk] One anchor Hole is not deep enough to Specs (3 feet versus 6 feet deep) (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:07:18 -0700
If you can't break up the shale and remove it then why not use it as the anchor?  Bore some holes in it, epoxy in some rebar and cast that in concrete or epoxy in some anchor bolts and bolt in the gu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-02/msg00059.html (10,533 bytes)

258. Re: [TowerTalk] Declination - Does it matter? (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:06:43 -0700
Why would the tower care? I want to do it right . If I am turning my beamChile, I don't want to actually be shooting at the ocean. Any advice please _______________________________________________ __
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-04/msg00086.html (8,304 bytes)

259. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Feeding single band HF yagis 500+ ft from the shack (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:14:12 -0700
I would bite the bullet and put in some hardline.  Messing with OWL and baluns/transformers, etc. will be nothing but grief. Wes  N7WS On 5/16/2022 3:39 PM, dave arruzza via TowerTalk wrote: To all..
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-05/msg00062.html (8,808 bytes)

260. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Feeding single band HF yagis 500+ ft from the shack (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 18:41:04 -0700
True open line with wide spacing and sparse insulators will likely not be affected too much.  But weatherproofing the transformers, etc might be an issue.  Probably not where I live where we've had 0
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-05/msg00065.html (7,993 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu