Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+SERIOUS\s+commentary\s+from\s+N4XY\s+on\s+\"no\-code\"\s+and\s+\"bounced\"\s+submission\s+to\s+\[CW\]\s+from\s+Bob\s+Marston\,\s+K1TA\s+\[LONG\]\s+but\s+please\s+/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:15:45 -0000
It isn't. Spectrum efficiency is bits/Hz. HF packet is about 0.1 bits/Hz. HF CW is about 10bits/sec, and needs about 50Hz to allow for fading etc, so is about 0.2 bits/Hz. Analogue speech is often r
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00522.html (9,088 bytes)

2. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:15:23 -0800
? However, voice communication proceeds at around 250wpm and cw at maybe 25wpm. It seems to me that for contesting, cw is better Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures --
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00531.html (10,155 bytes)

3. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:36:45 -0500
Is there an amplifier "tie-in" to this discussion that we've missed? -Paul -- Original Message -- From: Andy Wallace <andywallace@home.com> To: Bob Marston <k1ta@earthlink.net> Cc: Peter Chadwick <Pe
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00541.html (12,131 bytes)

4. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: andywallace@home.com (Andy Wallace)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:44:24 -0600
Yeah, a rather interesting one to me. If you are running CW--unless you are trying to bounce off the moon--you don't need a linear running 1500++++ watts--a decent antenna and 100 watts will do just
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00542.html (9,732 bytes)

5. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: jduffer@mnsinc.com (James D. Duffer)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:12:02 -0500
Probably.....like maybe QSK mods etc. Keeped tuned for further developments. 73, Jim WD4AIR -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative reques
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00548.html (9,588 bytes)

6. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 99 14:43:25 -0600
OBVIOUSLY, this guy has never listened on 40 M around 7.05 MHz. Try it some evening, you might be surprised. CW bands empty, yeah, right. Perhaps his antennas just aren't good enough! 73, Jon KE9NA
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00549.html (9,852 bytes)

7. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 99 14:45:26 -0600
Gees, the virtue of CW. Here is a man who has regaled it and just now states a virtue or it! It can EFFECTIVELY communicate with much less power than is required for phone. I thought you said it was
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00550.html (10,006 bytes)

8. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:59:00 -0500
As if 10M or 15M phone have a flurry of activity. Perhaps the CW contest operators being talked about have a real life and are doing something else once in a while. Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://ww
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00551.html (11,295 bytes)

9. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: andywallace@home.com (Andy Wallace)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:12:18 -0600
My beam works just fine . What about the rest of 40--from 7.05 to 7.150? I repeat--virtually empty! Andy K5VM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Adm
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00553.html (10,271 bytes)

10. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: andywallace@home.com (Andy Wallace)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:45:10 -0600
Do you even know what "regaled" means? On HF CW is FAR less efficient then other forms of data transmission. We need a CW requirement because 1% or less of hams use moonbounce??--get serious! I won't
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00555.html (10,671 bytes)

11. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 22:57:52 -0600
Not on my radio. The majority of DX reported on my local cluster is on 40m CW. Also, there is plenty on 80m CW and almost all of the DX use CW on 160. There is plenty of CW work. I am always running
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00570.html (10,522 bytes)

12. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 16:24:55 -0500
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:15:23 -0800 Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> writes: Top Gun SSB contesters have much higher Q rates than CW counterparts. Fact, not fiction. 73 Carl KM1H ______________________
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00607.html (11,439 bytes)

13. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 16:00:01 -0500
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 07:17:29 -0800 Bob Marston <k1ta@earthlink.net> writes: On paper, yes. And what benefit does that have to do with emergency traffic? Emergency nets are on a single frequency and s
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00614.html (10,929 bytes)

14. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 15:29:12 -0500
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 21:39:04 -0800 Bob Marston <k1ta@earthlink.net> writes: SNIPPED No, but primarily due to the 10W restriction and high population density which restricts efficient antennas in many
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00616.html (13,891 bytes)

15. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 16:50:46 -0500
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:12:18 -0600 Andy Wallace <andywallace@home.com> writes: A real antenna hears wall to wall DX SSB; USA CW QRO, nets, Novice, QRP; digital,etc. plus the SW broadcasters. Not many
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00619.html (11,446 bytes)

16. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: andywallace@home.com (Andy Wallace)
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 18:58:58 -0600
Carl-- Today I worked East Malaysia at 22:48 on 7009.8--9M6AAC--he was begging for calls--most of 40 CW at this time was very quiet. Andy K5VM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Sub
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00623.html (12,514 bytes)

17. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal)
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 18:02:10 -0800
But since the SSB signal needs about (1800/50) = 36 times the bandwidth, the rate would have to be 36 times higher to break even... 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/a
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00634.html (9,554 bytes)

18. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 20:57:06 -0500
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 18:58:58 -0600 Andy Wallace <andywallace@home.com> writes: have the EU and NA QRM down in the noise. Of course that requires a site analysis to maximize antenna height and minimiz
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00636.html (13,814 bytes)

19. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: andywallace@home.com (Andy Wallace)
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 09:10:43 -0600
Carl-- Guess what? My 40 antenna has a rotator on it. 40 CW was VERY quiet around 5PM Central yesterday--plenty of bandspace available and the other ham bands had very little CW activity as well. And
/archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00648.html (10,076 bytes)

20. [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all (score: 1)
Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 05:13:27 -0800
? A contest of skill, Carl. Machine guns are a no-no in skeet shooting contests. Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.ht
/archives//html/Amps/1998-02/msg00157.html (8,883 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu