To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all |
From: | rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal) |
Date: | Sat, 30 Jan 1999 18:02:10 -0800 |
km1h@juno.com wrote: > > Top Gun SSB contesters have much higher Q rates than CW counterparts. > Fact, not fiction. But since the SSB signal needs about (1800/50) = 36 times the bandwidth, the rate would have to be 36 times higher to break even... 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all, km1h@juno.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] HV Switching Supply, km1h@juno.com |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all, km1h@juno.com |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code", Peter Chadwick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |