- 1. [Amps] A One Tube Radio (score: 1)
- Author: Radio WC6W <wc6w_amps@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:16:30 -0800 (PST)
- http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2007/10/31_NanoRadio.shtml 73 & Good morning, Marv WC6W http://wc6w.50webs.com/ * _________________________________________________________________________
- /archives//html/Amps/2008-01/msg00128.html (6,688 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] A One Tube Radio (score: 1)
- Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:38:09 -0500
- This may be the right place to discuss this radio since it takes a very large signal for it to work. You will need an amplifier to get the field strength needed. Just read the paper. Also it requires
- /archives//html/Amps/2008-01/msg00132.html (8,246 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] A One Tube Radio (score: 1)
- Author: Pat Barthelow <aa6eg@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:17:19 -0800
- Can you imagine the tinglies you would feel the first time, as the Principal Investigator, (Dr Zettl) and the grad student who built it. It was originally only a demodulator, until Dr Zettl, realized
- /archives//html/Amps/2008-01/msg00135.html (10,849 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] A One Tube Radio (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:36:03 -0500
- This is probably not the right place to discuss the nanotube receiver. However, the resonant properties of nanotubes are being used in the anti-cancer work by K3TUP as profiled in the current issue o
- /archives//html/Amps/2008-01/msg00136.html (9,777 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu