Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+EIMAC\s+$8877\s+TYPE$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+EIMAC\s+$8877\s+TYPE$\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 04:13:54 EST; Obviously the experience levels are no where near the same. Bob, this is soooooo true. Someone here recently said they would never build an amp for 6 meters using a pair of 3-500 tubes. Someone who n; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00196.html (7,823 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 06:01:33 -0500; There you go doing exactly what you complain about in others. I've built dozens of six meter and near six meter maps over the years, including 3-500Z's and even sweep tubes. If someone wants to butc; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00197.html (7,157 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: "Rick Stealey" <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:16:52 +0000; I'll tell you guys an interesting little story about 6 meter amps that is relevant to this discussion. A few years ago a friend came to me for help with getting an amplifier working on 6 meters. He f; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00198.html (9,224 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:25:34 EST; I'll tell you guys an interesting little story about 6 meter amps that is relevant to this discussion. A few years ago a friend came to me for help with getting an amplifier working on 6 meters. He f; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00199.html (8,838 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:34:53 -0600; I found K2XTs testimonial of Lou, W1QJ, to be an inspiration. On all the reflectors that I subscribe to, there is an abundance of misinformation. We all come biased. It is obviously important to be a; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00201.html (7,514 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: George Cortez Jr <ne2i@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:39:24 -0500; Here Here! Lou W1QJ helped me out with my non working SB1000 conversion and got it going for me without hesitation. I met him at the HVCDX summer party and he really was very knowledgeable on on thes; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00202.html (8,820 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:54:06 -0500; On all the reflectors that I subscribe to, there is an abundance of misinformation. We all come biased. Sometimes people get carried away also, and read things into things that are not said. It is ob; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00203.html (9,758 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:22:53 -0600; Sometimes people get carried away also, and read things into Comment - Effective communication. Each of us has to be careful of how and what we say so that it cannot be misinterpreted. The fault can; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00204.html (11,146 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 20:09:56 -0600; and I recommend it based on my experience. I personally would not recommend it based on theory or someone else's experience. I have tried too many antenna designs that work for some but didn't work; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00205.html (7,614 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:13:19 +0000; That little word "theory" is a trap. It has two entirely different meanings. 1. Theory: a hypothesis or speculation. The next step is to test it, so practical experience does trump that kind of "theo; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00206.html (8,809 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 06:40:02 EST; If practical experience seems to contradict that kind of theory, it's a reliable sign that you got something wrong. And that can be a very useful thing to know. In layman's terms I would say " the pr; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00207.html (7,601 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 07:12:24 EST; the fact you have to be careful running a 3-500Z on 50MHz. What we get away at on HF just doesn't fly up there unless you have a lot of dumb luck, and it basically will ruin the amp for any other use; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00208.html (9,879 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 07:18:09 EST; Here Here! Lou W1QJ helped me out with my non working SB1000 conversion and got it going for me without hesitation. I met him at the HVCDX summer party and he really was very knowledgeable on on thes; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00209.html (7,948 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:22:26 +0000; Hello Lou Yes, Lou, I have no dispute with you about that. I was responding to someone else's statement that "experience trumps theory, every time". Experience shows, that ain't so. -- 73 from Ian GM; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00211.html (8,641 bytes)
15. [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: "Gary Myers" <garymyers@powerc.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:12:20 -0700; George, I have an SB1000 I am thinking of converting to 6 - any details to share on this (or source of info)? thanks gary K9RX Here Here! Lou W1QJ helped me out with my non working SB1000 conversion; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00213.html (6,950 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: "k7rdx" <k7rdx@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:19:27 -0800; Experiance using lackluster theory is risky at best.The point Tom made was that some of the ceramic tubes work better(Efficiency,stability) at 50mhz than basicially any of the glass tubes...I agree w; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00216.html (9,609 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] EIMAC (8877 TYPE) (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:30:42 EST; It took me a long time to "let go" of my old 4-1000`s(HF ) and move on to newer ceramic tubes...I`ll never look back but the old guys did have a cool glow! 73,Jim K7RDX.. Jim, I found that out early; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00221.html (7,877 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]