Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+FW\:\s+RE\:\s+Liquid\s+Cooling\s+Systems\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Marbourg" <zborg@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:49:22 -0800
This massage was bounced originally due to an outlaw email masseuse accountant submission. Hi group. I am sorry, but I can't stand it any longer! There is virtually NO difference between "D.I." and d
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00263.html (8,201 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: Tomm Aldridge <KD7QAE@ARRL.NET>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:11:01 +0000
My XYL, a research biologist, concurs but adds that DI may be more risky as the ION exchange process could end up leaving behind chemicals if it is not properly balanced. Water is water. I am a physi
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00268.html (9,939 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:04:18 -0500
Tom, That's why I mentioned using salts to raise the boiling point. If I recall, they did something like this on nuclear reactor cooling. However, I dont know if that would increase the heat carrying
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00269.html (12,102 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:50:43 -0800
Fwiw, I don't know what temps are being looked at here, but if the need to raise the boiling point is necessary, for each pound of pressure placed upon a closed system, the boiling point of the water
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00270.html (12,839 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:05:45 -0500
Yup, that's what I'm talking about. I remember reading about sodium being used for this, no water in that circuit. Will _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesti
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00271.html (8,395 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: N5bbc@aol.com
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:11:53 EST
I can't remember the name of the product, may have been called "Water Wetter" but it is made by the Red Line lubricant company for use in race car cooling systems,using it really made a difference in
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00272.html (8,287 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Bert" <balmemo@sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:20:00 -0500
Where is the moderator? Don't you have anything else to talk about? I can't remember the name of the product, may have been called "Water Wetter" but it is made by the Red Line lubricant company for
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00273.html (9,136 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:25:43 -0500
Personally, I dont see anything wrong with the posts as they pertain directly to water cooled tubes. If some addative can be used to cool a tube better, this is an amp forum, and it should be discuss
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00274.html (10,291 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: N5bbc@aol.com
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:15:34 EST
Well, if we could use a half size radiator and reduce the frontal area of a formula racecar by increasing the effectiveness of the cooling system and you need to increase the cooling capabilities of
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00275.html (10,131 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:27:25 -0500
Joe, Correct, they make those copper blocks now to water cool aluminum heat sinks. I think there's about 2-3 heatsink manufacturers making them now, Thermalloy being one. This brings up several elect
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00276.html (10,099 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:42:46 -0500
Neither do I see a problem. Fact is, by this time next year I expect to see a water cooled solid state amplifier available at Dayton. There should be some 120 - 200 volt transistors available at a re
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00277.html (8,775 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Thompson" <g8gsq@ic24.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:07:04 -0000
Transferring heat across a metal-metal junction depends a lot on what happens at a microscopic level - imagine it like pressing the rough side of two pieces of sandpaper against each other. The actua
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00280.html (9,511 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: G3rzp@aol.com
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 05:04:22 -0500
Another point about the effects of local boiling can be found in the Nagayoka curves. The thin sheath of steam insulates the metal from the water, so it gets hotter, so the steam sheath gets a bit th
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00281.html (8,583 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 05:57:19 -0800
Also, if "Water Wetter" turns out to be electrically conductive, it may not be wonderful for an anode coolant. Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00283.html (11,146 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:07:50 -0500
Rich, I finally found Water Wetter on the manufacturers website last nite and read about it. Keep in mind this company makes lubricants. It said that water wetter reduces the surface tension of the w
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00284.html (12,511 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:39:09 -0500
Well, it sounds good but they left out a few things. It would seem that if the surface tension is less with this product that would make turbulent flow become less. With less turbulent flow there is
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00285.html (14,445 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:07:55 -0500
Gary, I thought the same thing as water boils at 212 deg F if I recall. There testing was a shade over boiling at 220 deg F. I guess what they were saying is that by decreasing the size of the bubble
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00286.html (17,131 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:52:03 -0500
To bring this back to water cooled tubes ... one can't raise the pressure for two reasons. The systems are generally run unpressurized and there is still a limit to the safe temperature for the seals
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00288.html (8,882 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] FW: RE: Liquid Cooling Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:46:29 -0500
Dear Paul, Here in Kentucky we have all sorts of hillbilly drug labs opening up and being discovered. Just last week they found a meth lab hidden in a golf bag. It seems these people are stealing flu
/archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00317.html (8,934 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu