Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Tube\s+amps\s+are\s+not\s+a\s+thing\s+of\s+the\s+past\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: <w8hw@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 12:29:49 -0400
Hello Jim and group, I respectfully disagree. Tube amps are not a thing of the past nor will they be for a long time to come. I would like to point out that I own and use both Solid state and Tube am
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00017.html (8,359 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 14:06:16 -0400
Jaw. If you over drive them it can be a quick death, while a tube will take an occasional over drive." Current SS amp protection circuity is very good and getting better all the time. In the case of
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00023.html (9,281 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: <w8hw@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 15:56:54 -0400
I am very familiar with that as I built one also, The issue is anyone who builds one must face that issue one way or the other. Any mistake and it is over. As I said, I have both LDMOS and Tube ampli
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00024.html (11,877 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 03:46:36 -0400
Although I agree, I would modify the conclusions a bit. High power semiconductor device technology is becoming more mature, with the result of longer device life cycles. Also, the longer a device rem
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00033.html (12,002 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 06:36:47 -0400
Tubes in High Power Amps can take a licking and keep on ticking...but not solid state amps devices. Replacing power MOSFETS in RF pallets is much more complicated. ___________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00035.html (7,619 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 08:28:53 -0400
The current crop of new devices is likely to be around much longer than devices made just 10 years ago. Given the trend to pallet based amplifiers, I doubt the device shelf lifetime will be very lon
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00036.html (8,646 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 12:43:41 +0000 (UTC)
Yes, ham gear needs to be based on the RF PA equivalent of the 2N2222 and 2N3055; devices that have many uses, are fully mature, and won't be readily obsoleted by new tech. We may need to see solid
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00037.html (8,365 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:06:23 +0300
_______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00038.html (7,858 bytes)

9. [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 07:56:48 -0700
<Tubes in High Power Amps can take a licking and keep on ticking...but not solid state amps devices. Replacing power MOSFETS in RF pallets is much more complicated. not much better, at only 1 watt. T
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00040.html (9,835 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: MU 4CX250B <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 10:02:36 -0600
I've long wondered what the zero watt rating of the 4cx1000 grid actually means. I've assumed it means the tube is rated for class AB1 operation only, and that the rating doesn't reflect the actual p
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00045.html (8,271 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@largeriver.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 12:30:48 -0500
Hi Jim, I think that the 4CX1500 has the same grid as the 4CX1000. Somewhere I have seen it written by Eimac that it is ok to draw a small amount of grid current during brief tune up. The Collins 30S
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00051.html (9,405 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 13:00:16 -0500
I have never liked the 30S-1 grid derived ALC. The grid voltage is passed through ( essentially ) an audio transformer and the tube has to draw grid current before the transformer's secondary is rect
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00052.html (10,707 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:15:43 -0400
I just cut the anode off a dud 4CX1000A. The control grid structure cannot be seen until I determine how to cut away the screen grid without destroying the control grid which I am going to guess is n
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00053.html (10,506 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 16:48:05 -0400
Add to that, the lack of knowledge in electronics, building, and the general age of "old timers", module / pallet replacement seems even more likely. Most of today's rigs use an output module. It's p
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00061.html (11,476 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ashby <n6ffc1954@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 21:18:40 +0000
Good Afternoon Roger! With the Solid State Amps, which I'm Thinking of getting one, I too believe that the parts May begin to be "More Available" as they "Age". I would Hope that Someone would "Pick
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00062.html (14,539 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 00:01:00 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: You'd have to be pretty careless to damage the grid of an 8877 since it is rated at 25 watts dissipation. The normal dissipation at 1500 watts output is
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00067.html (8,714 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] Tube amps are not a thing of the past (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 04:29:40 -0400
When in use, transistors do age. It's caused by the migration of the majority carriers migrating across the junction causing the majority carriers on one side to cause an increase of minority carrier
/archives//html/Amps/2017-06/msg00075.html (17,088 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu