Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\"QTC\?\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\"QTC\?\"\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 06:02:57 -0400; Further to the discussion about when and to whom QTCs should be offered.... Yesterday afternoon, I was having some very fast and enjoyable runs in WAE. I mean last-10 rates of more than 200 QSO's per; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00101.html (7,853 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 12:49:36 +0000 (GMT); Must be your karma for helping to set up/promote the reverse beacon network. de Doug KR2Q (TIC) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00103.html (7,243 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: "S56A" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:36:45 +0200; Pete, can you imagine how much fun EU contesters have fast typing up to 2K QTC for 36/48 hours? Small group of most dedicated ones would ask you for QTC. It is a favour for you as 10 QTC points are m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00106.html (8,055 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:53:57 -0600; The downside is that QTC's discourage little guns and propagationally challenged folks from participating at all. Can you imagine how frustrating it is to be a non-EU station doing S&P, get beaten ou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00107.html (7,404 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:16:36 +0400; Steve, you probably have a valid point in your comment... However, I must say that this year was my first "half-serious" attempt in WAE. As a European station with moderate equipment, QTCs really enh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00108.html (9,723 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:36:41 +0200; It will be not more frustrating then waiting for the identification of another dx station while doing s&p. Advantage is, you know already the call sign and that it takes one more minute of waiting fo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00109.html (8,613 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:13:48 -0800; QTCs are what make WAE unique. I find my attitude changes as I go through the contest. During the first day or when running for the first time on a new band, the requests for QTCs are nothing but tro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00110.html (10,727 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: n8cc@mei.net; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:01:00 -0400; The downside is that QTC's discourage little guns and propagationally challenged folks from participating at all. Can you imagine how frustrating it is to be a non-EU station doing S&P, get beaten ou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00111.html (8,248 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:21:11 -0400; I wish this was true, Mario, but I don't regard it as a favor, and your "small group" is very large indeed, from my experience. Please, let me have my fast runs and don't insist on QTCs until there a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00112.html (9,126 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: "Christian Schneider" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 06:51:53 +0200; Hi Pete, such is the flavour of THIS contest and other contests are different (luckily not each is the same). The operation habit you don´t like simply follows the necessary strategy as you can see f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00118.html (9,487 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: K1AR@aol.com; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:08:54 EDT; Pete, Over the years, no one has hated QTCs more than me. That being said, I now realize it's part of fabric of this particular contest. WAE is not simply about rate. My new enlightened view is that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00119.html (9,147 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: Zoli Pitman HA1AG <ha1ag@hg6n.hu>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:04:00 +0200; Pete I'm convinced our QTC requests take much less fun from you than what Skimmer takes from us due to your permanent advertising. 73, zoli ha1ag _______________________________________________ CQ-Co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00120.html (10,003 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:40:25 -0400; I simply say LTR and have it programmed in as my F6 function in CT. Works great. I got asked QTC? -dozens- of times. Ignored it and moved on to the next station. And when I actually had a lot of QTCs; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00126.html (11,027 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:52:21 -0400; John, I agree that QTCs are an inherent part of this contest. They were, as someone said, more fun when we did it all by hand, but it's a lot less tiring for us non-Europeans to let the machine do it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00128.html (11,074 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: Luc PY8AZT <py8azt@dxbrasil.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:53:05 -0300; I wish ours European friends could be even better than just sending "QTC?". Please, ask QTC with your call along, so we don't need to ask your call. QTCs are fun, even from non-EU side and that is th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00130.html (9,112 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: "Axel Schernikau, DL6KVA" <Axel.Schernikau@siv.de>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:54:50 +0000; First of all I must applaud to John for this point of view! And I can add: Without QTCs the WAE would be another boring contest during often worse summer condx for European stations. But it is the Wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00133.html (11,045 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: "Axel Schernikau, DL6KVA" <Axel.Schernikau@siv.de>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:18:12 +0000; Hello Luc, congrats the really nice sigs from PW7T here in EU! The task asking just "QTC?" has two reasons: 1) we already worked on the band You're on 2) we KNOW we still need QTC from You So why to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00135.html (9,752 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1): Author: "S56A" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:01:36 +0200; Hi Pete, You really touched EU nerve :-) You popularity seems to be very high with CW Skimmer. I might save you soon with CW Expert robot. Your propossal about 4 hours EU RTTY type test in CW mode is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00138.html (10,698 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]