Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Basic\s+SO2R\s+\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Basic SO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: Dirk Hacker <dirk.hacker@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:50:06 -0700
I'm new to this email group... Can I start SO2R contesting...with no major problems...with only >> - 2 CAT controlled Radios - dipole ants (rig #1) - multiband vertical (rig#2) - DX doubler (audio co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00143.html (7,546 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Basic SO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:11:38 -0500 (EST)
Many, including me, did some SO2R in the 80s with no CAT radios, DX doublers etc. It can be done with your stuff. K4XS/KH7XS In a message dated 11/15/2013 8:48:55 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim, dirk
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00151.html (7,500 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Basic SO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:00:11 -0800 (PST)
Yes An audio controller isn't really needed, you could make a simple manual audio switch. If you restrict one radio to a single band (say 40m for a domestic contest) the setup will be even simpler.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00152.html (9,412 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Basic SO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:54:24 -0800
Most station combinations used to simultaneously listen and transmit will use at least some additional filters to reduce cross-band interference. Long years of experience at the under-100-w levels on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00153.html (8,860 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Basic SO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Hider" <n3rr@erols.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:57:17 -0500
Dick, You don't state what rigs you will use. The price of repair or replacement of these rigs is important to the answer to one of your questions: "How can I make sure I don't fry the Rx front end(s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00155.html (9,369 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Basic SO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: Mark <n2qt@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:24:40 -0500
Another plug forw2vjn's book available from http://www.inrad.net/product.php?productid=248 Also be careful expecting dipole and vertical to not interact. There is quite a bit of coupling off the end
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00156.html (10,016 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Basic SO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:28:22 -0800
You got it from International Radio. http://www.inrad.net/product.php?productid=248&cat=0&page=1 -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr __________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00157.html (8,294 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Basic SO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 06:46:21 -0500
For several years, I ran SO2R with 1 KW to yagis on my tower and 100 watts to an HF9V on the roof of my garage. They were separated by some 250 feet, and both receivers had RX protectors in the RX an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00158.html (10,075 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Basic SO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: Dirk Hacker <dirk.hacker@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 09:50:11 -0700
Thanks to all for your inputs and suggestions. I'll plan to start simple (and safe) SO2R and then build up a bit at time. Experimenting should be part of the fun. Good luck to all for upcoming Nov. c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00159.html (9,130 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu