Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+Contest\s+and\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+contest\s+categories\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ Contest and ARRL DX contest categories (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:44:39 -0500
Have any of the major contest sponsors considered an expanded "single band" category in the contests? The JIDX contest or something like that has expanded categories which allow you to have a high ba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00527.html (6,928 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Contest and ARRL DX contest categories (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:40:29 -0500
IIRC, this was done decades ago in the ARRL contest for a couple of years, but dropped because of "a lack of interest." Exactly what that means is probably an interesting question. A typical sponsor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00529.html (8,273 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Contest and ARRL DX contest categories (score: 1)
Author: W6SX Hank Garretson <w6sx@npgcable.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 07:56:38 -0800
In 1984 I submitted the following to the ARRL Contest Advisory Committee: I propose that multiple, mutually-exclusive entries by a single station be permitted in ARRL contests. For example a station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00530.html (9,070 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Contest and ARRL DX contest categories (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 11:49:47 -0800
&Oslash; > ? It might help generate some activity. Interesting you bring this up. Just yesterday I was thinking there should maybe be a 160/80/40m mix category and a 20/15/10m mix one. Why? A lot of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00532.html (8,934 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Contest and ARRL DX contest categories (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:32:29 -0000
I wasn't stopped due to lack of interest at all. I think it was changed because there was a feeling that people wanted even more categories so everyone could win a certificate. I thought the high ban
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00547.html (10,390 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Contest and ARRL DX contest categories (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Zalewski" <dick.w7zr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 08:47:09 -0700
A comment on CQ WW contest catagories: Why does using packet (Assisted Category) force one to enter high power? I would think that packet and power are separate issues and you should be able to enter
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00556.html (11,873 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Contest and ARRL DX contest categories (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:33:17 -0500
I remember the old days of WAE. They used to have high and low band categories, too. Barry W2UP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00559.html (11,324 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu