Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+Xtreme\s+Categories\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+Xtreme\s+Categories\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:40:45 -0800; Not to belabor the obvious, but that's the whole point of it. Finding methods to improve communications capabilities and reliability. It's what the FCC charters us to do. - - - - - - - - - - - - - -; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00283.html (9,580 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: N2GC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:21:25 EDT; remote receivers should not be allowed outside either one's zone or country, i.e. no USA east coast stations with west coast receivers. Otherwise it will be a huge advantage for people in places like; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00278.html (10,035 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:09:24 EDT; I agree with N3BB on this one, and further think that remote receivers should not be allowed outside either one's zone or country, i.e. no USA east coast stations with west coast receivers. Otherwise; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00252.html (10,809 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:38:14 -0400; I don't speak for the ARRL DXAC, but I believe the relevant DXCC rule is: 9. All stations must be contacted from the same DXCC entity. The location of any station shall be defined as the location of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00222.html (19,329 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: Jim George <n3bb@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:43:51 -0500; As much as I respect CQ Magazine and their support of contesting, and the experienced and knowledgeable hams on the CQ CAC, I believe they have made a serious mistake with the new Xtreme categories.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00220.html (9,748 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>; Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:41:04 -0800; JT1XYZZ runs 1 militate in Ulan Bator on 1840 KHz which is heard by his "remote receiver" and is accessible to the public on the Internet. JT1XYZZ can also be heard real time on the Internet on his w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00211.html (12,900 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:38:55 -0400; What you do not anticipate Tim is that soon, everybody will have access to a free remote RX close to his QTH and nobody will be longer able to know what kind of contact he is making. Gilles VE2TZT _; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00204.html (9,641 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:52:02 +0100; I'm with Zack on this. If it doesn't seem right, you can bet it's not right. As for DXCC validity, let's take an example. EI0DX, just down the road, lets Zack control his receiver. That way, Zack "wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00202.html (9,822 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: LY8O <ly8o@ot.lt>; Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:12:37 +0300; Gents, I am not against any technical progress, any new operating techniques, but I can not feel real Amateur Spirit in announcing category, sorry... Some are right - major contests for many people i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00201.html (9,801 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:54:20 -0500; I hope so. Somehow it just doesn't seem right to me. I could set up a remote receiving site for 160 meters in Europe and be able to hear hundreds of stations I might never hear in the USA. People in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00200.html (14,808 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: "Craig Smith" <craig@powersmith.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:40:14 -0600; At first I thought this was all rather academic, since I never seriously compete in CQWW and other DX contests due to my 100W and temporary stealth wire antennas due to HOA restrictions. But I do usu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00199.html (8,609 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:07:13 -0400; http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/XtremeCQ_WW_Experimenter_June.pdf 3. The entrant's transmitting sites must be located in a single country, as defined by the applicable licencing authority, and a sing; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00197.html (13,251 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:09:28 -0700; Quoting from the official rules: 1. Entry categories: <excerpt> A single operator may submit multiple entries using different remote sites in different countries. Each entry will be scored separately; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00196.html (10,071 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:55:47 -0400; I guess I'll have to go back and read the CQ Magazine announcement again. When it was announced at the contest forum in Dayton, I understood that remote receiver sites would be limited to the same CQ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00193.html (11,410 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:36:32 -0500; I support the idea of innovations and advancement of the radiosport, and amateur radio in general. The new Xtreme category triggered a different thought while I was reading the discussion. All the VH; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00192.html (10,893 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: Tim EI8IC <tim.ei8ic@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:35:44 -0300; He can hear you, but you can only hear him if *he* has a strong enough signal to reach you! 73s Tim EI8IC http://www.mapability.com/ei8ic/ Ham Map Heaven. Free contester and newbie resources. The hom; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00190.html (8,973 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@videotron.ca>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:33:54 -0400; I totally share the fears of Mike, I find the Xtreme category a very good idea, EXCEPT for the REMOTE RECEIVERS OUT OF THE COUNTRY rule. 1) This rule WILL DRIVE THE CQWW STRAIGHT AHEAD TO A VIRTUAL I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00189.html (12,518 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: Marc Domen <on7ss.oo9o@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:17:50 +0200; That is right. Your signal could be received in a complete other part of the world. Say, a JA has a remote RX in Europe, what kind of contact are you doing then. I can work him with my tuned FD4. Sor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00188.html (9,937 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:56:29 -0800; Doug, I think this new unlimited-unlimited category is a great idea for several reasons, but these two come to mind. 1) Most importantly it validates the notion that experimentation and stretching t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00187.html (8,839 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1): Author: Prasad <vu2ptt@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:03:18 +0530; Mike, That is a very interesting way of looking at this new Xtreme category. I first took part in CQWW CW 1987 to try and work some new countries for DXCC - ultimately worked all of 30 QSOs in 48 hou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00186.html (9,910 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]