Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+results\s*$/: 70 ]

Total 70 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:35:15 -0700
But with the income from subscribers and advertisers why can't they hire a data entry person part time to post the results on the web site? All the work has been done when the results are posted in t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00001.html (9,287 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Jose Miguel Femenia Herrero EA5DFV <ea5dfv@uv.es>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:35:24 +0200 (CEST)
Hello! I agree with you, Clive, and yes, of cours: the European HF Championship by the Slovenian Contest Club is an other very well organised (and with free results) contest. Also the EU Sprints are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00004.html (8,811 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:12:06 +0000
Hi number of received logs, 2005: WPX CW - 2061 WPX SSB - 2437 ARRL DX CW - 2572 Russian DX - 2579 (+570 logs this year, and this number increases every year, yet) CQWW CW - 3802 CQWW SSB - 4092 Wond
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00007.html (8,668 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:42:46 EDT
data entry person part time to post the results on the web site? << No need for that, all the information is in the computer already when they are setting it to print in the magazine, just PDF or XL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00009.html (9,123 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Simon Pearson <lists+1@attenuate.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:44:23 +0100
[...] Another couple of years, and I'm sure the number of logs received in the Russian DX contest will have overtaken the number of logs received in CQWW. And that will be *great* to see! :) Personal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00010.html (9,096 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Ed K1EP <k1ep.list@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:17:57 -0400
Not only that, you receive a rather nice color booklet with all the scores and data, your UBN data is emailed directly to you, and you receive an invitation by email to enter the contest the followin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00014.html (9,818 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:50:24 -0000
Ed you said:""I don't subscribe to CQ mag, so I never know how I do. Has the contest become a marketing ploy for subscriptions?"" Well if that is their plan it's not working very well, at least by me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00020.html (11,203 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:37:50 -0400
I think I see a solution to *all* of the complaints about CQ Magazines' running of the CQWW contests: Allow *only* CQ Magazine subscribers to participate in the CQ-sponsored contests (CQWW, WPX, 160,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00026.html (13,707 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Art RX9TX <rx9tx@qrz.ru>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:59:32 +0000
Hello Jeff, Tuesday, August 2, 2005 Jeff Maass wrote to N7MAL: From the other hand, I would like to see ARRL-sponsored contest results available for everyone, not only ARRL members :) Again, Russian
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00029.html (9,727 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Rick Tavan N6XI <rtavan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:35:09 -0700
Good job! Three years is excellent from CQ. My best (worst) for receiving a CQWW plaque was eight years including three personal appeals to management. /Rick N6XI On 8/2/05, N7MAL <N7MAL@citlink.net>
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00031.html (9,498 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
It has NOTHING to do with CQ Magazine. At all. It depends on the management of that particular Contest, period. If it is take only FIVE months for CQ RTTY WPX Contest Director to publish the Results
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00036.html (10,883 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Bill <k6km@northvalleywireless.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 21:00:54 -0700
Andrei, Most points OK, but don't you think the magazine should actively solicit responsible persons to manage the CQ contests? I think they should do that. The idea that, "I'm just a volunteer so I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00040.html (12,667 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Simon Pearson <lists+1@attenuate.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 10:37:31 +0100
OK, in which case - where can I find the results online? I am not a subscriber to CQ Magazine, I have no interest in becoming a subscriber (not to mention the fact that I cannot afford it) so where c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00042.html (9,857 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: "Mario" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:52:27 +0100
results, stats, ubns, russian award credits and the other contest related info to anyone on the web, www.rdxc.org Some credit should be also given to Slovenian CC for a good processing of EUHFC scor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00044.html (9,188 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: "John W" <xnewyorka@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 08:40:10 -0400
I am not sure about this, but perhaps CQ Magazine is a for-profit business whose reason for existence is to sell magazines, rather than to spend time and money preparing the contents of their magazin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00045.html (10,677 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 17:13:44 -0000
John you said:""whose reason for existence is to sell magazines"" That was a giant over-simplification. Most likely they don't even break even selling CQ Magazine. They make profit from selling adver
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00067.html (12,562 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Simon (M0CLW), You seem to me trying to change the subject. We discussed the DELAYS with the results and shipping out the Plaques, certificates, etc. I responded with my opinion regarding those issue
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00080.html (13,533 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 09:46:24 -0700
All that I am asking is that CQ provide contest results to contesters who enter their contests on their CQ Contest website, PERIOD! What if enough contesters got pissed off enough to quit renewing th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00148.html (10,546 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:39:41 -0700
Alan Zack asked: What if enough contesters got pissed off enough to quit renewing their subscriptions? They would go out of business. Received the following direct reply from a Contest Honcho at CQ M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00156.html (11,651 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 08:17:52 -0500
Hi Alan, The only fly in your ointment is that the contesters you suggest would quit the magazine already get the results and would have no reason to be pissed off. The challenge for CQ would be to d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00157.html (12,676 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu