Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Limited\s+Antenna\s+Height\s+Category\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:20:04 -0600
I would like to suggest this thread consider something else--keeping the casual operator in the contest. I have read many comments about the necessity to have the casual operators in the contests-- t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00864.html (11,918 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:33:19 -0500
Why necessarily set certain height limits? I know plenty of folks out in California whose single antenna would be a wire vertical that is shot 60 feet into the top of a palm tree. Perhaps a category
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00865.html (14,242 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:52:44 -0500
My (one) city lot tower is 55 feet tall. I'll have to get some dirt and make a 5' high mound around the base. 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00870.html (9,543 bytes)

4. RE: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:52:57 -0600
This idea I could agree with, The idea of being able to 'compete' for my antenna category is something that would allow me to have a chance at a certificate. Exceptions might be on 80M and 160M where
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00871.html (14,977 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category (score: 1)
Author: Scott Nichols <snichols@mvosprey.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:24:32 -0400
How we're talking!!...The CQ WPX contests have the "TB-WIRES" category which allows (max) 1 tri-bander for the high bands (one feedline) and single element wire antennas for the low bands...That cate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00875.html (10,529 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:43:28 -0500
Well, the WPX has a gazillion entry categories - denoting the fact that the WPX contest is a unique one were basically anybody can be a multiplier. Here is the description from the WPX rules: "(e) Tr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00876.html (11,943 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:04:44 -0600
The reason I prefer to simply set a height limitation for the category is that the TB/Wires makes no allowance for a monobander at 24 feet, which was my antenna for several years. In TB/Wires I would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00892.html (11,763 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:47:16 EST
Rusty, We all choose our lot in life. I chose a covenant restricted neighborhood because we were offered a house here at a much reduced price because the contractor so thoroughly screwed up our first
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00894.html (10,253 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:36:44 -0600
Hi Paul-- it sounds as though you are in the San Antonio Area-- my home is in the Hill Country. Maybe we will meet, after I develop some mobility following major knee surgery last week. I know what y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00898.html (11,996 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu