-- Original Message -- The log-checking will not bust you for a bad RST. We have to send it because it is in the rules. -- Disclaimer: I didn't receive the original message, so I don't know which con
It's not a bust. The reality is that, in ARRL (and CQ) HF contests, all that matters is that your Cabrillo QSO records show valid reports, regardless of the actual reports (if any) that were sent or
Ev, Careful Ev. I have been told that I don't have to have a multiplier correct. That the log checking software will supply the correct multiplier for a contact. Is that correct? What the rules say,
Paul, I've seen reports for the June VHF QSO party where QSO's were busted for incorrectly reporting (or otherwise incorrectly transcribing) a multiplier. Again, I say Bravo ARRL and ARRL volunteers.
Ev Tupis wrote: "If your ARRL 10 Meter contest log shows a QSO with W2EV and a received RST of "59", it is a bust. Nobody got that report from me." As far as I know, most, if not all logging programs
I find it very amusing that people make statements about how logs are (or are not) checked without any information to support their assertions. I am part of the logchecking team for the ARRL 10M cont
Please consider this post to be an effort to contact the logchecking teams to get a definitive answer on the subject of busted RSTs. You claim that QSOs in ARRL 10M and ARRL 160M are busted if the ex
Such statistics may prove hard to find: so few stations send anything other than 5nn anyway, the number of people who could, if they wanted to, bust an RST is small. I do, however, know from experien