Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NEW\s+CATEGORY\?\s+CQWW\s+Challenge\s+\-\s+SO1R\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Kimball, KL2A" <kl2a@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:43:18 -0800 (PST)
CALLING ALL SO1R CONTESTERS! SO2R and SO1R are not the same. Therefore I am offering a certificate for the top 10 scores in SO1R. This is SINGLE OP, ALL BAND, 1 RADIO, HIGH POWER, NO PACKET. The Hist
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00528.html (7,996 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:21:36 -0500
Jon Kimball, KL2A wrote: "I traveled to the middle east set to do SO2R, then realized suddenly I didn't have all the filtering needed to make it work properly. I finally got it! Now I know exactly wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00531.html (7,322 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:19:51 +0000
Sorry John, but this thread is only permitted once per year :.) What if you forgot your computer or keyer? Would you want hand logging or straight key to be another category? Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00533.html (7,893 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:52:00 -0500
What a crock! It simply shows that you failed to plan properly or to recycle the old quote "those who fail to plan, plan to fail." It is, as it always has been, SINGLE OPERATOR not SINGLE RADIO categ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00534.html (10,209 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R (score: 1)
Author: "John Klim, N3KHK" <n3khk_john@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:06:31 -0500
1. All flames to me. 2. The only score(s) I want to beat are my own scores! 3. I do SO1R; I currently do not have the space for proper antennas, SO WHAT! I enjoy all of the contacts I make. Actually,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00535.html (13,089 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 04:19:14 -0000
According to QRZ.COM, there is no SO1R. Here's the skinny on SO2R. SO2R Kazimierz Drzewiecki QSL via SP2PI POLAND 73, de Hans, K0HB <grinnin', duckin', and runnin'> -- ______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00536.html (8,080 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:35:14 +0100
The real sports seemingly don&acute;t know this - or why are there "Nanny"-like weight-categories i.e. in boxing? Would it be a compromise to add the relevant information (SOxR, op-hours, basic anten
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00539.html (8,268 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:02:36 +0000
I want a MM1R category for those of us poor m/m stations that only have 1 radio per band... split off the MM2R into their own class! David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00540.html (8,662 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] NEW CATEGORY? CQWW Challenge - SO1R (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:10:05 -0600
I believe a special category for SO1R versus SO2R would be wrong. At my station I am always a Single Op. It is my choice to do SO1R or SO2R. I do not have the skills to do SO2R nor the interest in se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00541.html (9,686 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu